@dappergander @JxckS This is incorrect. It wouldn’t be violating the policy because it “contains eyewitness accounts or on the ground reports from developing events” and the players are public figures.

Source: https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/personal-information

@kcivey @ifvictr @dappergander @JxckS They took the rules out of context and cropped out additional terms above it.

This whole rule change/addition is absolutely absurd and why I'm going to use Mastodon more often now. Bird app don't consider a "name" to be private information... really? It's the first example of private info on a number of sites.