Manu Sebastian മനുSep 30, 2020

From #BabriVerdict :
Court says :
1. No evidence that accused incited the mob on the day of demolition.
2. As to speeches, slogans etc., made earlier by accused, court refused to accept press reports, video tapes, photos as authentic. Newspaper reports hearsay evidence.

RT @[email protected]

Babri Demolition Case : Anti-Socials Climbed On The Dome; They Can't Be Called Ram-Bhakts, Says Court [Read Judgment] https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/babri-demolition-case-anti-socials-climbed-on-the-dome-they-cant-be-called-ram-bhakts-says-court-163775#.X3SvH9SoLiM.twitter

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/manuvichar/status/1311338934010552321

Babri Demolition Case : Anti-Socials Climbed On The Dome; They Can't Be Called Ram-Bhakts, Says Court [Read Judgment]

A Special CBI Court at Lucknow on Wednesday (30th September) acquitted all 32 persons accused of hatching the criminal conspiracy behind the demolition of the Babri Masjid mosque on December 6,...

Show threadManu Sebastian മനുSep 30, 2020
3. Court adopts a conspiracy theory in the form of an unverified intelligence report that anti social/anti-national elements could have assembled in the area under the garb of kar sewaks and surmises that they might have created trouble. (Quite astonishing!)
#BabriMasjid
Show threadManu Sebastian മനു

4. No material to show accused raised provocative slogans.

5. Incident occurred suddenly and without provocation and accused did not themselves expect that it would happen, court says.
#BabriVerdict
#BabriMasjidDemolitionCase

Sep 30, 2020 at 4:46pmMastodon Twitter Crossposter
Show threadManu Sebastian മനുSep 30, 2020
P.S : Time spent reading and analysing the judgment could be better spent by re-watching "Ram Ke Naam" documentary of Anand Patwardhan, which will give a realistic idea of what was brewing in the backdrop of #BabriDemolitionCase
#BabriMasjid