" U.S. District Judge George B. Daniels ... ruled that ... each element of counterclaimant Sol de Janeiro's brand of Brazilian Bum Bum Cream jar individually and altogether serves as a function that improves the container's quality." www.law360.com/ip/articles/... #TradeDress
Analyzing the Lululemon v. Costco Dupe Suit
Guest blog post by Profs. Sarah Fackrell & Alexandra J. Roberts https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/07/analyzing-the-lululemon-v-costco-dupe-suit-guest-blog-post.htm #trademark #design #tradedress

George McCain, #Fluke's industrial designer, on the colour of the company's #multimeters

#TradeDress #TradeMark #law

https://youtu.be/DbOc1TWfKxg?si=E4XSyZ8XaINZuHxB

Why Are Fluke Tools Yellow – The Story Behind the Iconic Color

YouTube
Jury finds that Armadillo engaged in some trademark infringement (and some counterfeiting) but awards Gibson only $1 in profits: www.scribd.com/document/842... #TradeDress

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:hvwhptk4oerwsuzau66ikwfy/post/3ljzl7jo3z225
Gibson v. Armadillo - Verdict | PDF | Trademark Infringement | Common Law

Gibson v. Armadillo - Verdict

Scribd
Speaking of trials, the retrial in the Gibson trade dress case started on Friday: Gibson, Inc. v. Armadillo Distrib. Enters., No. 4:19-cv-00358 (E.D. Tex.), following remand: 107 F.4th 441, 443 (5th Cir. 2024), as revised (Aug. 8, 2024)). #TradeDress
Bluesky

Bluesky Social
The Second Circuit has reversed, finding that Wonderful's allegations of infringement and nonfunctionality both survive Twiqbal: ww3.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/is... #TradeDress

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:hvwhptk4oerwsuzau66ikwfy/post/3kahi2epn5g23
U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 3,936,105 - registered in 2011 (and listing first use in 1986) for the shape of the Birkin bag, excluding the handles. #TradeDress
Bluesky

Bluesky Social

Fourth Circuit affirms the USPTO's refusal to register the certain parts of the Timberland boot design as trade dress:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca4.170358/gov.uscourts.ca4.170358.60.0.pdf

The court agreed that the claimed design was not distinctive and did not reach the issue of functionality.

#TradeDress #FashionLaw #PartialDesigns

Federal Circuit reverses the grant of a preliminary injunction (based on utility patent and trade dress infringement) in a dispute between indoor "adventure parks":

http://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/22-2047.OPINION.2-16-2024_2271523.pdf

#FederalCircuit #PatentFedi #UtilityPatents #TradeDress

Ledge Lounger v. Luxury Lounger - Plaintiff moved for a preliminary injunction against trade dress infringement. Defendant agreed to the entry of such an injunction, without conceding liability. Defendant redesigned the accused product. Plaintiff asked the court to hold the defendant in contempt, arguing that the new product violated the injunction.

Decision: No contempt because "there has been neither an adjudication nor an admission of infringement."

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txsd.1907429/gov.uscourts.txsd.1907429.59.0.pdf

#TradeDress