"I think we should look at this and concede that🚨America doesn't want to be a democracy, as per the 2024 vote. That instead,🚨 America wants to be the land of boys.
Point is that #fascism🚨is the tyranny of #men who won't grow up.
I think psychology explains everything. #Hegseth, #StephenMiller, #MarcoRubio, #RFKJr🚨-act like growing up was like getting mugged.
There're⚡plenty of boys on the left, too, who're fighting the tyranny of growing up."
-J Stoehr
Gen X/Y,💙#women...➡️LEFT
#Misogyny #USPol
#JenniferWelch #Ivehadit #jaketapper #stephenmiller
I love these women from the “ I’ve had it “ podcast, I follow them is several platforms, Jennifer Welch has a very interesting way of giving the news with a lot of cursing and she sounds so funny, here she is showing an interview with the sociopath Stephen Miller ( he acts really scary in this video) in Jake Tapper’s show , it is just 5:18 minutes long .
This is the man (actually) running our country right now.
How America would look if we put a bunch of White Supremacists in charge: https://www.AuthorFreeman.com/racists
New strips every Sunday. Reposts of strips from my first-term collection, TRUMPBERT: OUR LONG NATIONAL NIGHTMARE (https://www.Trumpbert.com) most weekdays.
#dilbert #parody #trump #satire #comic #webcomic #StephenMiller #whiteNationalism
Stephen Miller Criticized Online for Opposition to Judicial Oversight of Surveillance
📰 Original title: 'Completely mental': Stephen Miller skewered online over 'whining' rant on spy powers
🤖 IA: It's clickbait ⚠️
👥 Users: It's clickbait ⚠️

Stephen Miller, former Homeland Security Advisor, faced widespread criticism online after voicing his opposition to proposed checks on U.S. surveillance powers. Lawmakers have suggested that federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies should obtain judicial approval under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) before spying on Americans. Miller reacted strongly on social media, arguing that requiring the Secretary of Defense to seek approval from judges, whom he described as 'liberal DC judges,' was absurd. He further claimed that surveillance on foreign soil is essential for U.S. security. Critics quickly challenged his assertions. Writer Curtis Yarvin mocked the logic of equating foreign surveillance with domestic security, while Politico legal reporter Josh Gerstein clarified that FISA judges are located across the country, not solely in Washington, D.C. Former Congressman Justin Amash highlighted constitutional concerns, noting that the government collects extensive data on Americans and may search it without a warrant, which the Fourth Amendment aims to prevent. The online response highlighted a broader debate over privacy, government surveillance, and checks on executive power, emphasizing that Miller's comments were widely seen as misrepresenting both legal procedures and constitutional protections.
Stephen Miller Criticized Online for Opposition to Judicial Oversight of Surveillance
📰 Original title: 'Completely mental': Stephen Miller skewered online over 'whining' rant on spy powers
🤖 IA: It's clickbait ⚠️
👥 Users: It's clickbait ⚠️

Stephen Miller, former Homeland Security Advisor, faced widespread criticism online after voicing his opposition to proposed checks on U.S. surveillance powers. Lawmakers have suggested that federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies should obtain judicial approval under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) before spying on Americans. Miller reacted strongly on social media, arguing that requiring the Secretary of Defense to seek approval from judges, whom he described as 'liberal DC judges,' was absurd. He further claimed that surveillance on foreign soil is essential for U.S. security. Critics quickly challenged his assertions. Writer Curtis Yarvin mocked the logic of equating foreign surveillance with domestic security, while Politico legal reporter Josh Gerstein clarified that FISA judges are located across the country, not solely in Washington, D.C. Former Congressman Justin Amash highlighted constitutional concerns, noting that the government collects extensive data on Americans and may search it without a warrant, which the Fourth Amendment aims to prevent. The online response highlighted a broader debate over privacy, government surveillance, and checks on executive power, emphasizing that Miller's comments were widely seen as misrepresenting both legal procedures and constitutional protections.