“A well-known principle of human behavior says that when we ask someone to do us a favor we will be more successful if we provide a reason. People simply like to have reasons for what they do.”
― Robert B. Cialdini, Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, 1984
#manipulation #persuasion #validation #influence #conversation #memory #neuroscience #campaigning #narratives #storyTelling #Psychology #socialPsych #socialPsychology #facilitation #Cialdini #book
"Subjective validation, sometimes called personal validation effect, is a cognitive bias by which people will consider a statement or another piece of information to be correct if it has any personal meaning or significance to them. People whose opinion is affected by subjective validation will perceive two unrelated events (i.e., a coincidence) to be related because their personal beliefs demand that they be related."
CC-BY-SA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjective_validation 🧶
#manipulation #persuasion #validation #influence #conversation #memory #neuroscience #campaigning #narratives #storyTelling #Psychology #socialPsych #socialPsychology #facilitation #Cialdini
“There is a natural human tendency to dislike a person who brings us unpleasant information, even when that person did not cause the bad news. The simple association with it is enough to stimulate our dislike.”
― Robert B. Cialdini, in his book "Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion", 1984
#manipulation #persuasion #influence #conversation #memory #neuroscience #campaigning #narratives #storyTelling #Psychology #socialPsych #socialPsychology #facilitation #Cialdini
a few notes on a Linda Rising's talk
"Realize up front that this is hard".
Cognitive dissonance: contradictory "evidence" causes severe cognitive discomfort.
* We are not rational decision-makers
* but we are good at explaining after-the-fact why we made a decision – a pattern called rationalization.
Two thirds of people will not consider an idea until "somebody they know pretty well, is doing it, is happy with it, talks about it […] so maybe i might think about it".
To convince,
* you must address: "What's in it for me?" – requires empathy;
* you can use the values of your opponent. (Loyalty or fairness?)
A pattern of personal touch: walk a mile in the other's shoes
Another pattern: "Give it a try"
Another pattern: listen
Another pattern: ask for something personal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrCD1wmK9oM via @matthew
#conversations #memory #neuroscience #campaigning #narratives #storyTelling #morality #socialPsych #socialPsychology #facilitation #rationalization #values #influence #LindaRising #morals #principles
Speaking out for democracy and US higher education:
https://bit.ly/DemocracyAndHigherEdSign
Please complete this form to add your name to the statement Speaking Out for Democracy and US Higher Education Anyone with a stake in US Higher Education is welcome to sign this letter. Emails are for identification purposes only and will not be disclosed.
Marcher pour voir: Entretien avec Timothy Shortell
https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/socsoc/2023-v55-n1-socsoc09772/1115291ar/
#Sociology #VisualSociology #Semiotics #SocialPsych #Mobility
I never tried online #gaming but know lots of people who did. An interesting article about changes in the online social culture over time and the ability to make online friends.
https://slate.com/culture/2024/12/video-games-world-warcraft-multiplayer-call-duty-halo.html
Does instructor-led #dialogue improve learning or #criticalThinking?
A new (and free) paper indicates that dialogue classes' essays scored higher in "critical reasoning", but didn't seem to do better on tests of argument evaluation or objection.