@iuculano On Friday, Judge Kathleen Williams told Trump's lawyers that they have some 'splaining to do with their homework (which should have been completed before suit was filed in January) is due in 2 weeks.

#Trump #SlushFund #Lawsuit

https://mathstodon.xyz/@Arpie4Math/116660828844223722

@huntingdon @Nonilex The NYT headline is from 2026/05/19, a day after Judge Kathleen Williams was given little choice but to close the case she was questioning, while the 35 retired federal judges showed up with their motion to reconsider on 2026/05/28 which the Judge based her order on on 2026/05/29 which the subject matter of the initial post in this thread.

So the NYT headline did not consider Judge Williams order to Trump, Trump's family, and Trump's businesses to give her

> their position on the matters set forth in the Motion, including (1) the charges of collusion and whether the Parties are truly adverse; (2) the assertion that the dismissal in this case was premised on deception by the Parties; and (3) the question of whether the case should be reopened because the Court was the “victim of a fraud.”

because of the linearly ordered nature of time for events tied to the world line of a massive body like the Earth.

#Trump #SlushFund #Lawsuit

Update on the #Trump #SlushFund #Lawsuit

2026/05/29 The Judge, already suspicious of the weirdness of Trump suing his own government, has made an order to Trump, his family, and his businesses:

> the non-party movants ask this Court to reopen the instant case pursuant to Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, arguing that the Court should “exercise its authority under Rule 60 to set aside the judgment in this lawsuit . . . [and] resume its inquiry into whether there is an actual underlying case or controversy[.]”

> the non-party movants advance grievous allegations that Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed this litigation solely to avoid judicial scrutiny of a lawsuit that “was collusive from the start” and was only filed to provide the imprimatur of legality for an unlawful settlement.

> Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs shall file a response to the Motion (DE 63) on or before June 12, 2026, detailing their position on the matters set forth in the Motion, including (1) the charges of collusion and whether the Parties are truly adverse; (2) the assertion that the dismissal in this case was premised on deception by the Parties; and (3) the question of whether the case should be reopened because the Court was the “victim of a fraud.” (DE 63 at 13, citing 11 Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2870 (3d ed.)). The non-party movants may, if they choose, file a reply on or before June 19, 2026.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72207870/trump-v-internal-revenue-service/

She also noted that only #ToddBlanche signed the tax audit provision. The separate, 9-page agreement laying out the $1.8 billion #SlushFund was signed by Woodward & Frank Bisignano, who is serving as the “chief executive officer of the #IRS”, a newly created role [created by the #Trump admin in October 2025] that is not subject to #Senate confirmation.

#Trump #law #judiciary #criminal #fraud #DOJ #JudicialProcess #theft #TaxpayersMoney #kleptocracy #MafiaState #Jan6 #militia #MAGASlushFund

…Trump’s suit, as IRS officials laid out in their memo & other lawyers have noted, had clear legal flaws. Potential defenses against it include that it was filed after the statute of limitations, & that it incorrectly faulted the IRS for the actions of the contractor, Charles Littlejohn…. But the #DOJ never even made an attempt to contest Trump’s suit. Not a single government lawyer entered an appearance in the case.

#Trump #law #fraud #theft #TaxpayersMoney #kleptocracy #MafiaState #SlushFund