📰 Science Ink: Science as a Form of Embodied Loyalty

Science ink is more than just a tattoo—it's a record of science on the body. Explore Carl Zimmer's book and discover how knowledge becomes an intimate archive of life. Check it out now!

https://dobrepanstwo.org/szkatulka-kosztownosci/science-ink-nauka-jako-forma-wcielonej-lojalnosci

#ScienceInk #CarlZimmer #sciencetattoo #scientificknowledge #anthropologyofthebody

Fundacja Dobre Państwo | Polski Smart Tank

Tłumaczymy złożoność współczesnego świata na język zrozumiały dla każdego. Analizy o demokracji, gospodarce i społeczeństwie.

Fundacja Dobre Państwo

Show HN: Lune - Software for agents that do serious science

Lune은 AI 에이전트가 과학적 지식과 행동 근거를 확보할 수 있도록 지원하는 소프트웨어로, 최고 수준의 연구 문헌과 저명한 학자들의 연구 모범 사례를 기반으로 합니다. 이를 통해 AI 에이전트가 신뢰할 수 있는 과학적 근거를 바탕으로 작동할 수 있게 합니다. AI 에이전트 개발에 직접 활용 가능한 도구로 평가됩니다.

https://luneresearch.com

#aiagents #scientificknowledge #software #researchgrounding

Lune | Scientific Research Knowledge and Tools for AI Agents

Knowledge and action grounding based on top-tier research papers, real-time conference monitoring, and curated research best practices.

Lune Research

🧑‍🎓 The #subjectofknowledge is part of #observation 🔬 – #scientifictheory rethought 🤔

#NaturalScience is often regarded as an #objectiveDescription of the world. However, even great #physicists such as #WernerHeisenberg and #AlbertEinstein repeatedly emphasized that #scientificKnowledge can never be understood completely detached from the #conditions under which it came about.

📎https://philosophies.de/index.php/2021/12/05/wie-wirklich-ist-bewusstsein/

📺 https://youtu.be/0LG4gU_jfik

#GerhardRoth #Consciousness #Neuroscience #Physics #Observer

CAS Future Leaders Program | Ph.D. & Postdoc Leadership

#scientificknowledge https://share.google/wvd64K1KTkYIGiLpJ

"#Safeguarding Research & Culture (#SRC) is creating an alternative infrastructure for #archiving and disseminating of #culturalheritage and #scientificknowledge. We seek to preserve cultural memory in a way that traditional archives cannot. Together, we can ensure that our cultural, intellectual and scientific heritage exists in multiple copies, in multiple places, and that no single entity or group of entities can make it all disappear."
V. @lavaeolus
https://program.why2025.org/why2025/talk/B8DANE/
Safeguarding Research & Culture: Save public data from the digital bookburnings! WHY2025

Archives are vulnerable. Modern archival methods are robust, but no archive or institute alone can withstand the threats we are currently facing. Safeguarding Research & Culture (SRC) is creating an alternative infrastructure for archiving and disseminating of cultural heritage & scientific knowledge. We focus on publicly available material under threat of being deleted or altered. We preserve this data using open standards, open-source software, distributed storage and your help!

#TechnologyNetworks
#AcademicResearch

As the fields of #lifescience and #healthcareresearch progress, they are producing increasingly large amounts of #complexdata that must be carefully analyzed to produce reliable results.
#Datasets too large and varied to analyze with conventional methods are known as #bigdata and can often hold the key to leaps forward in #scientificknowledge and understanding.

11/
Cromer continued [4]:
"Cults and prophets arise spontaneously from the depths of the egocentric mind, whereas #ScientificKnowledge must be passed from generation to generation by a complex educational process that spans twenty years or more. [...] just as Europe once abandoned Greek #education in a wave of pious fundamentalism, America may someday turn out the light"

Today, preserving #science may need "to stop relying on scientific infrastructure provided by one nation or organization" [5]

GPT-fabricated scientific papers on Google Scholar: Key features, spread, and implications for preempting evidence manipulation https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/gpt-fabricated-scientific-papers-on-google-scholar-key-features-spread-and-implications-for-preempting-evidence-manipulation/
"Roughly two-thirds of the retrieved papers were found to have been produced, at least in part, through undisclosed, potentially deceptive use of GPT. The majority (57%) of these questionable papers dealt with policy-relevant subjects (i.e., environment, health, computing), susceptible to influence operations. Most were available in several copies on different domains (e.g., social media, archives, and repositories).
Two main risks arise from the increasingly common use of #GPT to (mass-)produce #fake, scientific #publications. First, the abundance of fabricated “studies” seeping into all areas of the #research infrastructure threatens to overwhelm the scholarly communication system and jeopardize the integrity of the scientific record. A second risk lies in the increased possibility that convincingly scientific-looking content was in fact deceitfully created with #AI tools and is also optimized to be retrieved by publicly available academic search engines, particularly #GoogleScholar. However small, this possibility and awareness of it risks undermining the basis for #trust in #scientificKnowledge and poses serious societal risks."
#science #AIEthics
GPT-fabricated scientific papers on Google Scholar: Key features, spread, and implications for preempting evidence manipulation | HKS Misinformation Review

Academic journals, archives, and repositories are seeing an increasing number of questionable research papers clearly produced using generative AI. They are often created with widely available, general-purpose AI applications, most likely ChatGPT, and mimic scientific writing. Google Scholar easily locates and lists these questionable papers alongside reputable, quality-controlled research. Our analysis of a selection of

Misinformation Review

Just met a person who thinks that Covid was probably a nasty flu.

Which is not utterly distant to respiratory disease scientists insisting for +80 years that "It's not airborne" and even this year, "Surgical masks are good enough."

Arguing from "#ScientificKnowledge is the product of inter-related communities all trying to disprove their hypotheses" now looks pretty hollow.

The harm these jokes have done to the credibility of our best source of knowledge about the physical world is immense.

Effects of transdisciplinary research on scientific knowledge and reflexivity – InfoDoc MicroVeille