The "lone genius founder" is one of tech’s most enduring stories. But innovation rarely emerges from a single person. It grows from networks of researchers, institutions, public investment, and collaboration.

🔗 https://theconversation.com/le-mythe-du-fondateur-quand-la-silicon-valley-exporte-ses-recits-jusqua-occulter-le-fait-que-linnovation-est-dabord-collective-278456

#Innovation #Research #SciencePolicy #TechEcosystems #Collaboration

Le mythe du fondateur : quand la Silicon Valley exporte ses récits jusqu’à occulter le fait que l’innovation est d’abord collective

La mise en avant des entrepreneurs est souvent l’arbre qui cache la forêt. Car le succès de certaines entreprises doit autant, voire plus, à la qualité des écosystèmes où elles éclosent.

The Conversation

Nearly 2,000 scientists, including six Nobel laureates, have signed an open letter opposing planned staff cuts in the University of Nottingham's physics department. Researchers warn the move could weaken a globally recognized research and teaching hub.

🔗 https://physicsworld.com/a/nottingham-physics-redundancies-an-act-of-academic-sabotage-warn-scientists/

#Physics #HigherEducation #Research #SciencePolicy #Academia

Nottingham physics redundancies 'an act of academic sabotage', warn scientists – Physics World

University plans to cut almost 30% staff in the physics department

Physics World

At a hearing of United States House Committee on Science Space and Technology, lawmakers examined paper mills and open access fees, but no shared path for reform emerged. Integrity, cost and access remain in tension.

🔗 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01251-y

#OpenScience #AcademicPublishing #ResearchIntegrity #SciencePolicy #papermills

US lawmakers intensify scrutiny of scientific-publishing practices

A congressional hearing covered the rise of paper mills and the costs of open-access publishing — but there was little agreement on what reform would entail.

Proposed new US funding rules: We can cancel any grant at any time

Peer review now optional, political staff would screen grants for forbidden topics.

Ars Technica
Proposed new US funding rules: We can cancel any grant at any time

Peer review now optional, political staff would screen grants for forbidden topics.

Ars Technica
White House proposes new rules giving political appointees final approval on research grants

These proposed Office of Management and Budget regulations would render the federal research grant review process opaque

Scientific American

A major legal dispute highlights how scientific publishers are challenging the use of copyrighted research papers in training AI systems, raising questions about data access and ownership in modern science.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01481-0

#AI #SciencePolicy #Publishing #OpenScience #Research

Elsevier vs Meta: first science publisher sues over scraped research papers

Science publishing giant Elsevier has joined a class-action lawsuit against Meta that alleges the reproduction of copyrighted works in developing the Llama AI model.

📊 Towards an inclusive Open Science

This study analyses 52 policy documents across Europe & the Americas and finds a gap between ambition and practice:

➡️ Strong focus on open access & data
➡️ Limited guidance on EDI and public participation

💡 Key takeaway: inclusion and engagement must be implemented alongside openness to truly democratize science.

🔗 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.240857

#OpenScience #EDI #SciencePolicy

China stops updating a 22-year journal ranking system once used to evaluate and fund researchers.

A shift away from “where you publish” toward “what you contribute”.

🔗 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01216-1

#SciencePolicy #Research #Academia #Evaluation #Publishing

China discontinues prominent journal ranking list

Letter to the Editor