news from the publishing world

News this week is that Springer Nature is selling off both Scientific American and Spektrum der Wissenschaft - and to different buyers as w...

Join the discussion between Javier Armentia, astrophysicist and science communicator, and Pampa Garcia Molina, director of Science Media Centre Spain and EFSJ board member.

What We Will Cover

🌑 The Eclipse Itself
A brief overview of what a total solar eclipse is, the context of the 2026 eclipse within the trio of eclipses occurring this year, historical data on the impact of recent eclipses, and the enduring sense of fascination surrounding these celestial events.

📰 Journalism as Public Service & Risk Communication
Looking carefully at our responsibility to the audience : eye safety guidance, debunking myths and hoaxes, understanding credulity and cognitive biases, and communicating risk effectively without sensationalism.

🛠️ Toolkits and Resources
Analysis of available resources, where journalists can find authoritative information, and a practical list of key points every journalist should address when covering the eclipse.

When ?

Tuesday 30 June at 16:00 CET

Where ?

Online. No need to register. https://meet.google.com/wug-hhat-ryg

This event is free and open to anyone.

https://efsj.eu/2026/06/14/efsj-online-workshop-30-june-beyond-the-corona-what-science-journalists-should-look-at-in-a-total-solar-eclipse/ #Astrophysics #Eclipse #Sciencejournalism #webinar

My latest @forbes article has just gone live. It is a deep dive on extreme heat in cities. Five brand-new papers (each from a different discipline) together paint a worrying picture of the scale of the problem.

#science #ScienceJournalism #climatechange #cities #heatwave

https://www.forbes.com/sites/lauriewinkless/2026/05/29/600-million-people-cant-stay-cool-the-hot-city-problem-is-growing/

600 Million People Can’t Stay Cool. The ‘Hot City’ Problem Is Growing

New research confirms that extreme heat is reshaping city life, and we’re not prepared for what that means for the future

Forbes

Please reshare! Here's the first in a series of #sciencewriting resources I'm posting to my website: A list of science writing/communication internships and fellowships.

https://brittanytrang.com/science-journalism-fellowships-and-internships/

#sciencejournalism #scicomm #scicommjobs #journalismjobs #journojobs #sciencecommunication #sciwri #stem

The (slow) thread collecting all my features published in #CurrentBiology in 2026 starts here. #ProseAndPassion #Science #ScienceWriter #ScienceJournalism #biology #ecology The old thread for 2025 is here: https://mastodon.social/@proseandpassion/113782468349225978

Author Sophie McBain wasn't on my radar screen, though it turns out I had read some of her pieces before.

Good journalists / longform writers are scarce. We want to recognise them.

Here's her website:
https://sophiemcbain.com/319-2/

#GoodJournalists #ScienceJournalism #longform #LongReads #SophieMcBain

Interviews – SOPHIE MCBAIN

A new technique for detecting unknown and unlooked-for chemicals is revealing dozens of contaminants in alligators, sea lions and condors

https://knowablemagazine.org/content/article/food-environment/2025/how-gators-and-condors-help-track-down-pollutants

#knowablemagazine
#sciencejournalism

Open Letter to Anti-Trans Science Journalists

Posted by Matthew R. Francis over on Bluesky. I searched for a Mastodon account for him, but no luck.

#ScienceJournalism

https://galileospendulum.org/2025/06/05/open-letter-to-anti-trans-science-journalists/

Open Letter to Anti-Trans Science Journalists

To my science journalist colleagues at the New York Times, Washington Post, The Atlantic, The Guardian, and elsewhere: I write this open letter on the day the New York Times begins a podcast series…

Galileo's Pendulum

"While the tone and style of ChatGPT summaries were often a good match for human-authored content, "concerns about the factual accuracy in LLM-authored content" were prevalent, the journalists wrote. Even using ChatGPT summaries as a "starting point" for human editing "would require just as much, if not more, effort as drafting summaries themselves from scratch" due to the need for "extensive fact-checking," they added.

These results might not be too surprising given previous studies that have shown AI search engines citing incorrect news sources a full 60 percent of the time. Still, the specific weaknesses are all the more glaring when discussing scientific papers, where accuracy and clarity of communication are paramount.

In the end, the AAAS journalists concluded that ChatGPT "does not meet the style and standards for briefs in the SciPak press package." But the white paper did allow that it might be worth running the experiment again if ChatGPT "experiences a major update." For what it's worth, GPT-5 was introduced to the public in August."

https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/09/science-journalists-find-chatgpt-is-bad-at-summarizing-scientific-papers/

#AI #GenerativeAI #Science #ChatGPT #LLMs #Chatbots #Journalism #Media #News #ScienceJournalism

Science journalists find ChatGPT is bad at summarizing scientific papers

LLM “tended to sacrifice accuracy for simplicity” when writing news briefs.

Ars Technica