It gets boring. Again just 3 days, and the clowns are back, claiming alleged malware without being able to even name an example… Can someone please close that circus?

#Google #SafeBrowsing

Wow, new record: less than 3 days for the next false positive. What do the folks at #Google #SafeBrowsing have as profession? How many clowns do they have for breakfast? 🤦‍♂️

OK, "same procedure as every year, James". Tell me y'all have turned off this fake security setting, and I simply stop playing their game…

https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/4909577#google-safebrowsing

Netcraft false positives, Google Safebrowsing shenanigans ($4909577) · Snippets · GitLab

GitLab.com

GitLab

This is ridiculous. Just 3 days after the "unknown malware" was declared gone, those clowns are back – with the very same "unknown". They cannot even name what they claim to have found.

Again, if they want to have _real_ findings, they should simply scan their own domains…

#Google #SafeBrowsing

It is not our circus, so why do those clowns always come to us – at least twice a month? "Malware found on your website – but we have no clue what or where" 🤦‍♂️ Does anyone still trust that "service" for safe browsing?

https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/4909577#google-safebrowsing

I've stopped counting how many, but always false "positives". While I still get the daily spam/scam hosted at storage.googleapis.com (a site they do NOT scan. Guess they have their reasons. Just imagine them blocking themselves 🍿)

#Google #SafeBrowsing

Netcraft false positives, Google Safebrowsing shenanigans ($4909577) · Snippets · GitLab

GitLab.com

GitLab

Oh, the clowns are back in town 🤦‍♂️ Seems to be the same file as last time, I guess (that is: none)? Or do I misread their report? 🤔 Too much "AI" there, I guess – while much lack of NI? How comes that "service" is still in business?!?

#Google #SafeBrowsing

This incompetence is … olympic? Took them just 2 days to pop this up again. Instructions they give on how "to fix this problem":

"Check the example URLs on the 'Security Issues' page in Search Console. Note that this page displays a list of samples and not an exhaustive list of problematic URLs."

No, indeed no "exhaustive list". It's an EMPTY list, so this advice cannot even be followed 🤦‍♂️

They shall be trusted to control safety of all Internet & devices? 🤯

#Google #SafeBrowsing

New month I guess? 4 weeks since the last fake alert? Can someone please shut down whatever produces all those false positives?!?

Yupp, this time Goog claims we've been hacked. They just don't know where. So I've requested a review now, stating all indicated pages have been cleaned 🤷‍♂️

Should you still use that "safe" browsing – consider switching it off. Or at least be very skeptic when it shows you something.

#Google #SafeBrowsing

"Google Safe Browsing missed 84% of confirmed phishing sites in our dataset. […] Google is, quite literally, hosting phishing attacks on its own infrastructure and not catching them with its own detection tools"

https://www.norn-labs.com/blog/huginn-report-feb-2026

#Google #SafeBrowsing

Huginn Report: February 2026 | Norn Labs

Google Safe Browsing missed 84% of confirmed phishing sites in our dataset. Here's what we found and what it means.

Day 4 again, without any response. Quite a reliable service that: you can rely on it to let you wait. What does that run on, that it takes that long? An Arduino Pico? Needless to say that the alleged malware file does not even exist, and never was malicious.

Filed another review request.

Again: disable that stuff. Seems to have more false positives than real stuff. Especially as entire domains hosting the real stuff (like storage.googleapis.com) are excluded from scan.

#SafeBrowsing #Google