Response shifting: a qualitative meta-synthesis on response shift - Quality of Life Research

Purpose This qualitative meta-synthesis aimed to (1) describe health-related studies that examined response shift using qualitative methods, and (2) synthesize the qualitative results about response shift. Methods We systematically searched MEDLINE, PSYCINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, Social Science Citation Index, and Dissertations and Theses Global to identify health-related studies using qualitative and mixed methods designs to examine response shift (n = 2221). Findings were classified using constant targeted comparison and “imported concepts” (e.g., recalibration). Results Of 1010 records screened, 33 had full-text screening; 14 were included, 10 of which used patient-reported outcome measures as part of their qualitative methods. Six studies specified a qualitative methodology. All of the 14 studies inferred evidence of response shift. Recalibration evidence was related to comparisons to previous health states or to others with poorer health; pre-existing expectations of current health; and adjustment of their quality of life standard. Reprioritization evidence was related to shifting life priorities to compensate for changing health status and forced changes in goals/priorities due to severity of treatment effects. Reconceptualization evidence was associated with changes in participants’ health conditions and/or treatment and commonly co-occurred with reprioritization highlighting their interconnectedness. Authors of 10 studies noted possible alternative explanations of response shift, including: recall bias, incapacity of verbalizing experiences/feelings, irrelevant stimuli, and response bias, none of which ruled out concurrent occurrence of response shift. Conclusion Future work is needed to engage in dialogue about how multiple lenses towards inquiry and analysis may be leveraged to examine the multiplicity of ways in which people experience change in meaning.

SpringerLink

(1) preregistration and #RegisteredReports as tools to strengthen confirmatory rigor in complex clinical designs;
#RCT

(2) responsible data and material sharing under appropriate governance structures that account for the sensitivity of clinical data;
#ResearchEthics

(3) analytic transparency, including documentation of analytic decisions and #QualitativeResearch practices.

* For more on the working group, link to German profile:
https://www.dgps.de/fachgruppen/fgkl/aktivitaeten/ag-open-science/

#DGPs #OpenResearch

DGPs - AG Open Science

Die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie e.V. (DGPs) ist eine Vereinigung der in Forschung und Lehre tätigen Psychologen und Psychologinnen. Die DGPs erstrebt die Förderung und Verbreitung der wissenschaftlichen Psychologie. Die über 4700 Mitglieder der DGPs erforschen das Erleben und Verhalten des Menschen. Sie publizieren, lehren und beziehen Stellung in der Welt der Universitäten, in der Forschung, der Politik und im Alltag.

If your question is about shared perspectives or group dynamics, focus groups can reveal what one-to-one interviews often cannot: how meanings form through interaction. They let you observe how participants respond to each other, negotiate viewpoints, and shape discussion through context and social cues. Learn more: https://qdacity.com/focus-group/

#QualitativeResearch #ResearchMethods #QDA #QDAcity

Method triangulation helps you study the same phenomenon through more than one lens and see where findings converge or differ. By comparing results across methods, you can reduce reliance on a single approach, strengthen claims, and refine explanations. Used deliberately, it makes your reasoning easier to follow. https://qdacity.com/method-triangulation

#QualitativeResearch #ResearchMethods #Research #QDAcity

Member checking helps you test whether your interpretations make sense to the people who shared their experiences. Used thoughtfully, it can strengthen ethics and rigor by inviting feedback on meaning, surfacing misunderstandings, and documenting how interpretations were reviewed. It can be used after interviews, during analysis, or when drafting findings.
https://qdacity.com/member-checking/

#Research #CAQDAS #QDA #QualitativeResearch

Our first textbook is finally on sale! Place orders for physical or digital editions here:

https://www.quirkos.com/learn-qualitative/qualitative-textbook.html?ref=mastodon

#Qualitative #QualitativeResearch #Textbook

Quirkos - Doing Qualitative Research - Welcome

Welcome to the Quirkos curated course, featuring all our best materials for all stages of qualitative research.

Mixed methods helps you study a research problem from more than one angle, combining qualitative depth with quantitative patterns. It supports broader coverage, stronger inferences through triangulation, and flexible designs that fit your question. Used well, it becomes a coherent strategy for building answers from multiple forms of evidence.
https://qdacity.com/mixed-methods-research/

#QualitativeResearch #ResearchMethods #QDA #QDAcity

Transferability in qualitative research helps readers judge whether findings fit other comparable settings. You can strengthen it through rich description of context, reflexivity, and data triangulation. When your setting and analytic choices are clearly documented, others can assess fit without overclaiming.
Explore more: https://qdacity.com/trustworthiness/transferability/

#ResearchMethods #QDA #Research #QualitativeResearch

quallmer looks like a serious step toward making qualitative research with LLMs more transparent, reproducible, and methodologically grounded.
Codebook-based workflows + inter-coder reliability (Krippendorff’s alpha, Fleiss’ kappa) + audit trails = bridging classic qualitative rigor with AI-assisted analysis.
#LLM #DigitalHumanities #QualitativeResearch #AI #RStats
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/quallmer/refman/quallmer.html
Help for package quallmer