undefined | Former New Jersey hospital employee allegedly stole $2.5 million worth of medical supplies by Francie Ebert

A former surgical technician at Cooper University Health Care in Camden, New Jersey, has been charged with stealing roughly $2.5 million in medical supplies and reselling them in South Carolina. Marci M. Staun, 44, allegedly posed as a medical‑supply vendor to sell the stolen items to a legitimate supplier, violating charges that include theft, receiving stolen property, distribution of prescription drugs and impersonation of a medical‑organization representative. Prosecutors say financial records show she collected more than $427,000 from the resale of the equipment.

The theft was first detected in early October 2026 when hospital staff discovered a significant shortfall of Medtronic Infuse bone‑graft devices and other supplies, with inventory counts not matching documented usage. Surveillance footage from November‑December 2025 captured Staun arriving with an empty bag and leaving with it full, and investigators noted a sudden increase in refill orders between December 2024 and July 2025 that could not be justified by patient care needs. In December, the Camden County Sheriff’s Office intercepted Staun as she attempted to leave the facility carrying the missing supplies.

Cooper University Health Care has cooperated fully with law‑enforcement, terminating Staun’s employment and reporting the incident as soon as it was discovered. The former employee is now detained at the Camden County Correctional Facility while the criminal case proceeds, and the hospital has reiterated its zero‑tolerance policy for theft or any legal violations.

Read more: undefined

#newjersey #cooperuniversityhealthcare #medtronicinfuse #camdencountysheriff’soffice #prosecutors

yahoo news | After the release of the Epstein files, why have there been so few arrests?

After the Department of Justice released more than three million pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, prosecutors have not filed any new charges. The files contain accusations from alleged victims, thousands of emails, and photos showing Epstein’s contacts with prominent figures, but appearance in the records does not prove criminal wrongdoing. Justice Department officials say they have found no credible evidence that the network surrounding Epstein extends to further prosecutable offenses, and they will act only if solid, admissible proof emerges.

Legal experts explain that the high bar for criminal prosecution—proof “beyond a reasonable doubt”—makes it difficult to move from documents to charges. Even though the files include references to possible “co‑conspirators,” such labels are merely interim identifiers, not formal accusations. Prosecutors need rock‑solid evidence of intent, knowledge, and direct participation; without reliable witness testimony, corroborating forensic evidence, or a clear chain of command, a case is unlikely to survive a jury trial. Additional hurdles include the statute of limitations on certain offenses and the difficulty of establishing criminal conspiracy when many individuals only had peripheral contact with Epstein.

The lack of U.S. arrests contrasts with developments in the United Kingdom, where two former officials were detained on suspicion of misconduct in public office—charges unrelated to sexual abuse but tied to alleged corruption. In the United States, the Justice Department’s redacted releases and the piecemeal nature of the documents have hampered public understanding, fueling speculation about hidden evidence. Nonetheless, officials maintain that, absent compelling, unredacted proof, no further prosecutions will proceed, leaving the “Epstein files” largely a matter of public scrutiny rather than immediate legal action.

Read more: https://www.npr.org/2026/04/03/nx-s1-5766260/epstein-files-arrests-doj-prosecutors

#jeffreyepstein #departmentofjustice #unitedstates #prosecutors #legalexperts