Miguel Afonso Caetano"For much of the 2010s, Nordic governments adopted a wait-and-see approach to platform work. Gig companies were framed as technological innovations rather than labor market actors. When regulation came, it often focused on markets rather than labor relations. Only recently have governments begun to address misclassification, proposing legal changes to strengthen the definition of employment. These efforts remain incomplete, contested, and slow — while platforms are already deeply embedded.
Gig capitalism’s Nordic success was not inevitable. It was enabled by concrete policy choices: deregulating taxi markets, tolerating legal ambiguity, and prioritizing competition over worker protection. The rise of gig work in the Nordic countries is not an anomaly. It reveals that the Nordic labor market model, often treated as universal, is in fact segmented and conditional. Strong protections exist where unions are powerful and collective agreements cover entire sectors. Where they do not, platform capitalism finds ample room to grow.
Gig companies did not overthrow the Nordic model but navigated around it — classifying workers out of existence, recruiting from marginalized segments of the labor force, and leveraging political willingness to reshape markets in their favor. The question, then, is not whether the Nordic countries can regulate gig work. They clearly can. The real question is political: whom the Nordic model is designed to protect — and whom it is willing to leave behind."
https://jacobin.com/2026/02/nordic-labor-gig-work-tech-platforms/
#Europe #GigEconomy #PlatformWork #Deregulation #Sweden #Finland #Norway #Denmark
Casilli 
Weizenbaum-Institut
@economyandspace
Toni Aittoniemi
Frank Schreiber
EU Council
Maximilian Henning