Show threadNonilexJul 22, 2025

Dodaro also stressed that his team had a “well-established tradition of #nonpartisanship, despite allegations to the contrary,” as a defender of congressional interests.

“The #ExecutiveBranch & the #Trump administration have a very expansive view of the president’s authority,” he said. “We have a #statutory responsibility to protect the prerogative of #Congress & the #power of the purse.”

#law #AbuseOfPower #Project2025 #RussVought

Nick Byrd, Ph.D.Sep 24, 2024

"Political #socialMedia ads labeled as from in-party sources and apparently non-partisan sources were trusted more than out-party sources.

So if you want to be sneaky just advertise under a name without any party connections"

That's a description from @mjbsp.bsky.social‬ about an #openAccess paper in #PoliticalPsychology by @tomstafford et al.: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.13034

#politics #marketing #persuasion #journalism #decisionScience #nonPartisanship #socialPsychology #cogSci #bias #debiasing

MyPoliticalTwinOct 25, 2023
POL-ICYMI: The Original First Amendment Can Mend the Broken House of Representatives. Let's ruffle some feathers. Districts were supposed to be limited to 30,000 citizens. Now, some are bigger than States. The opposite of hyper-partisanship and hyper-hypocrisy is super non-partisanship. We measure that. Political parrots can't think outside the cage. https://policykeys.com/publicpolicyblog/the-original-first-amendment-can-mend-the-broken-house-of-representatives/?utm_source=flipboard&utm_content=PolicyKeys%2Fmagazine%2FPolicyKeys%3A+Where+Can+We+Agree%3F Where can we agree? #politics #nonpartisanship #Congress
The Original First Amendment Can Mend the Broken House of Representatives - PolicyKeys: Where Can We Agree?

Let's ruffle Congress's feathers. House districts were supposed to top off at 30,000 people so voters could talk with their representatives.

PolicyKeys: Where Can We Agree?