I seldom agree with critics' remarks such as:
• "This show was way better than it needed to be."
• "We're don't deserve such beautiful music."
• "This book had no business being this good."
If taken literally, I mean.
My usual opinion is that art which is less-than-good shouldn't be offered to the public in the first place. Because I want high artistic quality to be the norm. To be the normal public expectation.
Making art is nearly always worthwhile for its creator, even if not good. And it typically deserves charity, too. Yet I think its audience ought to remain small unless the creator has achieved #mastery, or come close.
How much a work of art is able to benefit its creator is rarely matched by how much it is able to benefit society in general. If it benefits society in general at all...that takes lots of practice, wisdom, and sacrifice.
Remember Sturgeon's law.
Of course I'm not saying PEOPLE should stay hidden unless they meet a high standard. I'm only saying that their CREATIONS should. It's all right for people to have highs and lows, middles, and whatever else.
Um, my viewing of the movie KPOP DEMON HUNTERS prompted me to write that last paragraph for clarification. Figuring that Generation Alpha needs it. As well as some dear older folks, maybe.