#JeffreyKaplan - The #LiarParadox - an explanation of the #Paradox from 400 BCE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=in4u2i9v4vg&ab_channel=JeffreyKaplan
#Philosophy #PhilosophyOfLogic #Logic #Language #Math #Maths #Mathematics #Truth #SelfReference #Completeness #Incompleteness #StarTrek #Kirk #CaptainKirk #Picard #CaptainPicard
By Keith Devlin @[email protected]
#ZerothLawOfSemiotics • Discussion 4.1
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2022/12/25/zeroth-law-of-semiotics-discussion-4/
[ET:]
Well the truth value can be true or false or something else — akin to \(5+5=12\) being a true statement, if one knows what base it involves, else it may be false. The same for \(4+4=10\) being a true statement, if one knows what base it involves.
[JA:]
Yes, reference is relative to a frame of reference. In #PragmaticSemiotics, frames of reference are called #SignRelations.
In This Post-Epimenides World, Does Betteridge's Law Of Headlines Apply To Headlines About Betteridge's Law?
#ZerothLawOfSemiotics • Discussion 3
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2022/12/14/zeroth-law-of-semiotics-discussion-3/
My remarks on Facebook regarding the Zeroth Law Of Semiotics and its application to the Liar Paradox prompted Kent Olson to observe, “The liar paradox is a self-referential paradox, yes? I think #Russell answered these”. I added the following comment.
#Logic #Semeiotics #Semiotics #SignRelations
#Peirce #Epimenides #LiarParadox #AllLiarNoParadox
#AllLiarNoParadox
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/08/01/all-liar-no-paradox/
A statement \(S_0\) asserts that a statement \(S_1\) is a statement that \(S_1\) is false.
The statement \(S_0\) violates an #Axiom of #Logic, so it doesn’t really matter whether the #OstensibleStatement \(S_1,\) the so-called #Liar, really is a statement or has a #TruthValue.
#LogicalAxiom #LawOfLogic #LogicalGraph
#LiarParadox #Epimenides #EpimenidesParadox
#Peirce #Semiotics #Semeiotics #SignRelations
Zeroth Law Of Semiotics
Meaning is a privilege not a right.
Not all pictures depict.
Not all signs denote.
Never confuse a property of a sign,
just for instance, existence,
with a sign of a property,
for instance, existence.
Taking a property of a sign
for a sign of a property
is the zeroth sign of
nominal thinking
and the first
mistake.
Also Sprach 0*
9 Oct 2002
#Logic #Peirce #LiarParadox #ProtonPseudos
#Semeiotics #Semiotics #SignRelations
#ZerothLawOfSemiotics
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/07/30/zeroth-law-of-semiotics/
Zeroth Law Of Semiotics
Meaning is a privilege not a right.
Not all pictures depict.
Not all signs denote.
Never confuse a property of a sign,
just for instance, existence,
with a sign of a property,
for instance, existence.
Taking a property of a sign
for a sign of a property
is the zeroth sign of
nominal thinking
and the first
mistake.
Also Sprach 0*
9 October 2002
cc: Cybernetics • Ontolog Forum • Structural Modeling • Systems Science
cc: FB | Semeiotics • Laws of Form (1) (2) • Peirce List (1) (2) (3)
#CSPeirce #Denotation #Extension #InformationComprehensionExtension #LiarParadox #Logic #Nominalism #Peirce #Pragmatics #Rhetoric #Semantics #Semiositis #Semiotics #SignRelations #Syntax #ZerothLawOfSemiotics
CubeRootOfTrue
Jim Donegan 🎵 ✅
Keith Devlin
Jon Awbrey
Terry Boon (moved)
David Sanson
Inquiry Into Inquiry