Finally succeeded to disable #jqwik team's GH sponsoring. It just wasn't able to make a difference.

Many thanks to the few but very consistent supporters of the last few years. I feel I failed you but you were great!

Since work on #jqwik has mostly stalled I'd like to disable jqwik-team's GH sponsors account. It just seems not possible as long as there are sponsors. So, if you are a sponsor, please stop so that I can disable the profile.

RE: https://fosstodon.org/@jqwik/115909817208579968

Looks like I‘ll have to seriously consider upgrading/migrating #jqwik to JUnit 6. This will probably also mean moving to Codeberg.

Would upgrading #jqwik to JUnit Platform 6 provide any benefit for you?
Yes
88.9%
No
11.1%
Other (details in comment)
0%
Poll ended at .
Since I no longer expect nor hope to get any funding for evolving #jqwik into its necessary next generation, I feel now free to think about my next „hobby“ OSS project. Some ideas have grown over the last years, but maybe my followers have suggestions too?
Some criteria:
- No GenAI
- Useful to some or many, myself included
- Not aimed at making money or making rich people richer
- Not targeted by too many other OSS projects
- No GenAI
Interesting new issue (possibly a bug) in #jqwik: https://github.com/jqwik-team/jqwik/issues/651
Unexpected property failure when testing a mutating method · Issue #651 · jqwik-team/jqwik

Hi there, I'm exploring jqwik and encountered some behavior that I found surprising. I've created a minimal test case to demonstrate it. The goal of the test would be to test HashSet.add(element), ...

GitHub
#jqwik has a new Github sponsor! Thank you, https://github.com/MaisiKoleni, for your support.
MaisiKoleni - Overview

Software Engineer at @EvoLogics, passionate about Java and the JVM. Previously, I studied Computer Science for a while at TUM. - MaisiKoleni

GitHub
#jqwik 1.9.3 was released an 1 hour ago: https://jqwik.net/release-notes.html#193
jqwik Release Notes

jqwik : Property-Based Testing in Java

My application for sponsorship of #jqwik 2 by @PrototypeFund has been rejected (again).

I've decided to no longer apply for public funding. Given the high # of applicants and me being outside the intended target group (young, diverse teams), the chances of making it are just too low. It's not only about the application effort but also about the need to block the funding period from other endeavours until notification.

Thus, I consider two different paths for the future of #jqwik: ...

1/n

@jlink #jqwik 2 will come with free generators and unified shrinking. Now I'm thinking of going the reflective route as well.