The #fisk of the #PamBondi statement on the #LindseyHalligan departure continues:
> and fulfilled her responsibilities with courage and resolve.
#ErikSiebert, #JamesComey, and #LetitiaJames all had the courage to tell Trump "no" and the skills to fulfill their responsibilities. Halligan’s lack of experience was cited by Judge #Novak as a reason he didn’t impose sanctions for her inability to parse and follow the law.
> Her departure is a significant loss for the Department of Justice
Normative opinion; contradicted by judicial action. Judges kicked her out because that was necessary under the #law, not a loss of a bona fide asset of the #DOJ.
> and the communities she served.
You are thinking of Erik #Siebert or career prosecutors, I think.
> While we will feel her absence keenly, we are confident that she will continue to serve her country in other ways.
James #Comey wanted to serve his country and the #Constitution and #Trump tried to imprison him with the illegal appointment of #Halligan.
> The circumstances that led to this outcome are deeply misguided.
I agree, #Trump is a misguided circumstance. But the circumstances that led to Halligan’s ouster are: Article II of the US Constitution, 28 U.S.C. § 546, and established precedent on officer appointments.
> We are living in a time when a democratically elected President's ability to staff key law enforcement positions faces serious obstacles.
I support the #USConstitution, Pam #Bondi, why don’t you? The president was Constitutionally elected, not democratically as then a majority would have voted for him.