@Bundesregierung @AuswaertigesAmt Apropos T-Stempel:
Angesichts des staatlichen #Misgendering durch das #Trump - Regime der #USA [ich konnte entsprechende Fälle an Originaldokumenten persönlich verifizieren!] sollte dies als Politische #Verfolgung durch @bamf anerkannt werden!
- Alles andere ist Realitätsverweigerung!
#TransRights #HumanRights #DEpol #USpol #KeinMenschIstIllegal #TransRightsArehumanRights #FerriesNotFrontex #RefugeesWelcome
Resistance is loud where the law went quiet: rapid-response networks run know-your-rights trainings in church basements from Atlanta to Queens. Find your nearest immigrant legal-aid fund and give.
#SCOTUS #Immigration #TPS #Resist #Solidarity #Community #Democracy #News #Politics #HumanRights #Pride
→ https://twp.ai/4hs0cr

What Survives the Morning: The Lid, Lung & Donald Trump
Survival amid chaos: Supreme Court deportation ruling, deadly heat waves, Trump's vision, and queer resistance blueprints for fractured times.
Wendy The Druid"The Trump administration has turned the immigration system into a deportation machine," said Elora Mukherjee of Columbia Law. "In most cases, the Supreme Court has been a rubber stamp." DHS called it temporary "all along." That's the tell — the cruelty isn't a side effect, it's the product.
#SCOTUS #Immigration #TPS #Resist #Solidarity #Community #Democracy #News #Politics #HumanRights #PrideThree rulings in one week. All 6-3. The Supreme Court spent the back half of June handing the administration a deportation machine — on the shadow docket, no argument, no briefing. ~350,000 Haitians and Syrians stripped of protected status with a paragraph.
#SCOTUS #Immigration #TPS #Resist #Solidarity #Community #Democracy #News #Politics #HumanRights #Pride

Everything you need to know about the NYC Pride March 2026
Celebrate Pride and NYC's local LGBTQ+ community at the annual Pride March.
Time OutBeyond Prison: Mapping Deprivation of Liberty in China
https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/55297555

Beyond Prison: Mapping Deprivation of Liberty in China - SDF Chatter
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/55297044
[https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/55297044] > Archived
[https://web.archive.org/web/20260628055109/https://www.rights-practice.org/report-beyond-prison-mapping-deprivation-of-liberty-in-china]
> > On 26 June 2026, to mark International Day in Support of Victims of Torture,
The Rights Practice - a charity in the UK focused on human rights in China -
published an important new report, “Beyond Prison. Mapping Deprivation of
Liberty in China”. This report is an attempt to map the multiple ways in which
the Chinese state may deprive someone of their liberty. A confusing array of
practices and nomenclature can obfuscate the nature and purpose of each type of
detention. In this report we disentangle criminal, administrative and
extra-legal measures, explaining the legal basis and highlighting issues of
concern. > > Here is the full report: Beyond Prison - Mapping Deprivation of
Liberty in China (pdf)
[https://web.archive.org/web/20260628055456/https://www.rights-practice.org/Handlers/Download.ashx?IDMF=ae027300-f455-4d84-92ac-b75b676187ca]
> > China uses the deprivation of liberty for investigations and to punish >
offenders, but also as a tool for repression. The use and threat of detention
serve to silence critics and maintain social stability. > > Following the high
profile detention of several foreigners, the risk of detention is now a factor
in decisions to visit China by researchers, critics and the international
business community. > > This report has been written to help inform anyone
visiting or engaging with China including diplomats, officials, journalists,
NGOs and the business community. > > Informed by China’s obligations under
international law, the report highlights two key areas of concern: the risks of
arbitrary detention and ill treatment. > > With the deprivation of liberty
casting a long shadow over all human rights violations in China the report
describes the multiple forms of detention used, including their alleged purpose
and basis in Chinese law. How China categorises types of detention is important
to understand when questioning its use. > > The report distinguishes three broad
categories of detention in China: criminal, administrative and extra-legal. > >
The three categories are not mutually exclusive. In several instances,
administrative or extra-legal detention is a pathway to detention as part of
criminal proceedings which may serve to give the deprivation of liberty quasi
legitimacy. > > To help readers understand the Chinese context we describe the
political legal basis of different types of detention and introduce the main
institutions in the administration of justice (the gongjianfa). While the police
enjoy substantial discretionary powers to authorise detention, their authority
is rooted in the Chinese Communist Party acting through the zhengfawei
(Political and Legal Commission) or CCP appointees within the gongjianfa. > >
The legal basis and procedures governing decisions to detain in China > are
inadequate. Political interests frequently influence decision making > resulting
in a high risk of arbitrary detention. China does not have an > independent
judiciary, and the courts play no role in authorising pretrial > detention. > >
[…] > > The lack of judicial transparency is an obstacle to monitoring the law
in practice. The education label has been applied to many types of detention in
China. This helps officials obfuscate their identity as detention facilities.
The label also signals that the main purpose of these facilities is political. >
> The intent is to remould and transform those who dissent from CCP orthodoxy.
Police pressures to secure a confession, the lack of preventive monitoring, weak
regulations, risk of arbitrary detention and restrictions on access by lawyers
all contribute to the risk of ill treatment and torture. > > The report also
provides recommendations for other governments in the face of severe human
rights violations by the Chinese government. > > […]
From El Salvador to parlay French lyricists – Richard J Tilley