To be continued…

I’m not sure I can answer this question [nice way of saying this is a dumb question] for a couple of reasons. The first is that while I might personally be unhappy with the ending of a book, it’s the ending the author wanted so who am I, or anyone, to argue? And we’re talking about a book and published books go through a long editing process before publication that has it edited a number of times which is a lot of eyes on the book, or maybe not so many if all the editors happen to be cyclopes (I learned today from the dictionary that ‘cyclopes’ is the plural of ‘cyclops’. I thought it would just be ‘cyclopses’ so it’s good I checked) and if none of those eyes thought the accepted ending needed to be changed, then the ending must be ok. And finally changing the ending of a book just seems kind of whiny to me.

While I wouldn’t change the ending of any one book, one thing I would change is the endings of all books in general – and this is pretty much thanks to George R.R. Martin and Patrick Rothfuss – and that would be no cliffhanger endings allowed if your story extends beyond one book. I used to like reading fantasy books until I found George R.R. Martin who both renewed my interest in fantasy and pretty much destroyed it. Martin’s series was great, and it wasn’t so bad waiting a couple of years between books, but when a couple of years turned into five years and six years only to lead to a complete abandonment of the series and handing it all over to the HBO show writers to finish, I lost interest. And then the straw that broke this camel’s back was Patrick Rothfuss. Rothfuss wrote (or someone did?) a really great first two books of a planned trilogy and then after book two nothing for 15 years and counting but excuses. And for those fans looking forward for the release of book three? Nothing from the author but this. You might say the waiting shows no signs of abating. The reason I wrote “or someone did?” was because that’s just one of the conspiracy theories fans have put out to explain Rothfuss’ apparent abandonment of his trilogy. If you’d like to watch an entertaining take on Patrick Rothfuss and his “evil wizard vibes“, this video by Matt Moore of Dream Canon Publishing is really good.

I kind of went off on a little tangent there. Anyway, I don’t want to change the ending of any book. But I wouldn’t mind changing the rules of publication of books so that cliffhanger endings in series books aren’t allowed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSnQeyXAG_k

¿Por qué El caballero de los Siete Reinos cambia de género en HBO Max? #ElCaballeroDeLosSieteReinos #HBOmax #JuegoDeTronos #DunkYEgg #GeorgeRRMartin #Poniente #LaEspadaLeal #SeriesHBO #FantasiaMedieval #Temporada2 #felizmiercoles #24dejunio

https://donporque.com/el-caballero-de-los-siete-reinos-cambia-de-genero/

Robert Kirkman Reveals Why He Is Such An Admirer Of George R. R. Martin: “He Is Way Better At Killing Characters Than Me”
#News #AMC #Annecy #AnnecyInternationalAnimationFilmFestival #DarylDixon #GameofThrones #GeorgeRRMartin #Invincible #RobertKirkman #SkyboundEntertainment #TheWalkingDead

https://deadline.com/2026/06/robert-kirkman-on-walking-dead-daryl-dixon-george-r-r-martin-1236965878/

Gibt es eigentlich schon Projekte einer (kollaborativen) Fan-Fortschreibung von "Song of Ice and Fire"?

#georgerrmartin #songoficeandfire

House of the Dragon (2022-): Season 3 -Weeks Ahead

Subscribe to keep reading

Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.

Why Rhaena Replacing Nettles Is House of the Dragon’s Most Problematic Change

Spoiler Warning: This article discusses major events from the House of the Dragon Season 3 premiere, including the Battle of the Gullet, Rhaena’s Sheepstealer storyline, Jace’s fate, and book spoilers from Fire & Blood involving Nettles and Rhaenyra.

House of the Dragon returned for its third season with dragons, fire, and the long-awaited Battle of the Gullet. It was spectacular, costly, and emotionally devastating. But for fans of George R.R. Martin’s Fire & Blood, the premiere delivered something else entirely: confirmation that one of the most important characters in the entire Dance of the Dragons had been erased.

The showrunners erased Nettles, the lowborn, foul-mouthed, fearless Black girl who tamed a wild dragon with nothing but sheep and patience. They replaced her with Rhaena Targaryen, a princess who already received dragon eggs, already enjoyed every privilege, and now claims the one thing that made Nettles special: her ability to tame a wild dragon. The showrunners did not just cut a character. They weakened one of the Dance’s sharpest challenges to Targaryen exceptionalism.

“In Fire & Blood, Nettles is a lowborn teenager who is described as ‘foul-mouthed, filthy, and fearless,’ and is considered a dragonseed. However, unlike Addam, Hugh, and Ulf, it’s unclear whether she actually has any true Valyrian dragonlord heritage. Instead of claiming Sheepstealer by traditional means, she instead befriends the wild dragon by bringing him a freshly slaughtered sheep to eat every day until he gets comfortable around her.”

The article goes on to explain that Nettles is the only female dragonseed and the only canonically Black character in the book. Her method of taming Sheepstealer, not through blood, not through magic, but through patience and kindness, fundamentally challenges the Targaryen belief in their own exceptionalism. That is why her erasure matters.

IGN’s coverage of the Season 3 premiere included showrunner Ryan Condal’s reasoning for merging Nettles into Rhaena. His explanation is worth quoting in full:

“It just felt to us that because again, this story is told in point of view, that it felt more apt as this is a family story to where we had the opportunity to involve one of the family members in the storyline. And because Rhaena has been set up since Season 1 as the member of this family who doesn’t have a dragon and basically her sole identity is the Targaryen kid who doesn’t have a dragon, it felt like that was a character that we had already set this long runway for that it could be very satisfying for the TV audience that didn’t have an experience with the book at all to see that character claim a dragon and then in a very, I think, Game of Thrones and Westerosian kind of way, to reap the consequences of having her wish come true. It’s a very monkey’s paw kind of moment for Rhaena. She gets her great wish and it becomes her greatest nightmare.”

In other words, Condal wanted to give a family member something to do. He wanted to reward a character the audience already knew. He wanted a “satisfying” arc for a Targaryen. What he didn’t want, or didn’t understand, was Nettles.

The Change Damages Both Characters

Ryan Condal has offered reasonable justifications for some of his adaptation choices, but his defence of this particular decision does not hold up. He keeps defending why Rhaena needed a dragon storyline. That argument does not explain why Nettles had to be erased entirely. The show could have included both characters. At the very least, the writers could have cut one of the more repetitive dragonseed arcs, like Ulf and Hugh, whose arcs overlap far more with each other than Nettles’ does.

Condal gave Nettles’ character arc to Rhaena to facilitate her involvement in the plot. The writers also dismembered Nettles’ arc and gave parts to Hugh, which is deeply problematic because Nettles was the only female dragonseed with a positive smallfok point of view. Condal chose to eliminate the one character whose existence fundamentally challenges Targaryen exceptionalism. That choice deserves more scrutiny than he is willing to give it.

The change damages both Rhaena and Nettles in distinct but equally damaging ways. Nettles loses her role as the only canonically Black original character from the book. She was a lowborn girl who tamed a wild dragon through patience and cunning, not bloodright. Rhaena loses the quieter beauty of her own arc from the source material. In the books, she eventually bonds with her dragon hatchling Morning, a symbol of fragile peace and a new dawn. At least so far, the show has shifted attention away from that quieter Morning arc. Instead of giving Rhaena a meaningful triumph with Sheepstealer, the writers turn her into a reckless liability whose incompetence leads directly to Jace’s death. This is not an uplifting adaptation of either character; it is a disservice to both.

How The Change Protects Rhaenyra

One effect of this change is that it may protect Rhaenyra’s image. By replacing Nettles with Rhaena, the show avoids forcing Rhaenyra to order the death of a beloved outsider. In the book, that moment exposes her paranoia and cruelty. The writers can now make Rhaena look irresponsible enough that viewers will find Rhaenyra’s eventual turn against her understandable, if not sympathetic. This is an actual example of doing inclusivity terribly.

Not only is Rhaena a race-swapped character because in the books she is a high-born white girl, but the writers also eliminated a canonically Black character. Nettles is essentially a peasant with no discernible Valyrian traits, yet she accomplished dragonbinding of a wild dragon no less. The show erased a canon Black character and replaced her with a canon white one. They cast that white character with a Black actress and then wrote her as a bumbling liability instead of the strong, interesting character Nettles was written to be.

The show has consistently refused to let Rhaenyra make morally compromising decisions. This change fits that pattern perfectly. It is a cynical choice that prioritises the audience’s affection for Rhaenyra’s image over the thematic complexity of the source material. It makes the story poorer for it.

Related Stories

Final Thoughts

By now, George R.R. Martin’s frustration with House of the Dragon is well documented. In a highly publicised report by The Hollywood Reporter, Martin was said to have raised multiple objections to the show’s changes and allegedly declared, “This is not my story any longer.” Condal and the writers claim to be fans of Martin’s work, but the handling of Nettles raises serious questions about what they value in that work. Nettles is not just another dragonseed. She is a black, lowborn girl whose story challenges the Targaryen myth of blood supremacy. Her removal matters because it strips the war of one of its sharpest class and racial critiques.

This context matters even more when you consider Martin’s own history with representation. In a 2017 blog post about Nightflyers, Martin recalled how his publisher refused to put Melantha Jhirl, a Black woman, on the cover. The reason he was given was blunt: “if we put a black woman on the cover, no one will buy it.” Martin wrote that he protested, but lacked the power to force a change at the time. That history makes Nettles’ erasure feel even more pointed.

This is not progressive storytelling. Instead, the show gives Rhaena little meaningful screen time in earlier seasons, then folds Nettles’ arc into hers and turns Rhaena into a liability. If the writers wanted a stronger story for Rhaena, they could have written one without erasing Nettles. Merging the two characters does not fix the problem. It doubles the insult, because it weakens Rhaena’s original arc while disposing of Nettles with too little regard for what she represents.