Because so many people here don't understand what #censorship and #FreeSpeech really are:

Free speech is a right granted by a state. Censorship is if the state takes that right. There are limits to free speech like no hate speech and no jelling fire in a crowded room where there is no fire.

Technically this only concerns the state.

I'd argue that big monopolies, oligopolies and walled gardens can also be accused of censorship. However if they censor nazis even if no law demands them to, then in that case censorship is a good thing. But we all know its usually the opposite.

In the Fediverse there can't be censorship. You have the right to be on the Fediverse. You have the right to choose a server that moderates in a way you agree with. You have the right to change your mind and switch servers.

You do not have the right to be on a specific server. On the contrary. A server provider has the right to decline your application or to delete your account if you don't follow the server's rules.

If you mistake strict moderation that protects marginalized people on a small federated instance maintained and moderated by a small team of people trying to survive capitalism and maintain the instance with no compensation in their spare time for censorship, then you are wrong on climatejustice.social and you are free to leave.

#moderation #FediverseModeration #MastoMods

(2/2)

It's a strength of the fediverse that those vulnerable communities have had the freedom to design their own moderation systems and practices, to suit their particular needs. Here's my modest proposal to supplement these;

https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fediverse-ideas/issues/88

Even if all a person paid by Mastodon does is point newbie admins at those resources, that's a great thing for onboarding. Which on the whole, makes the experience here better for everyone.

#T&S #Mastodon #FediverseModeration

Standardised Moderation Levels in a Federated Network

### What if the fediverse had a standard set of moderation levels? Any server may Limit or Suspend any server, for any reason. But what this model aspires to do is to move us away from admins arbitrarily fragmenting the network, against the best interests of account holders. Motivated by petti...

Codeberg.org
Fediwall

https://purl.stanford.edu/vb515nd6874
https://stacks.stanford.edu/file/druid:vb515nd6874/20230724-fediverse-csam-report.pdf
from the pdf: "Thiel, D. and DiResta, R. (2023). #ChildSafety on #FederatedSocialMedia. Stanford Digital Repository" :
excerpt: "Background: Challenges of #FediverseModeration"
Child Safety on Federated Social Media

The Fediverse, a decentralized social network with interconnected spaces that are each independently managed with unique rules and cultural norms, has seen a surge in popularity. Decentralization h...

You're invited to talk on Matrix

You're invited to talk on Matrix

@akkoma @spreadmastodon @fediversenews


It looks like akkoma (not mastodon, different fediverse software) latest release includes a setting where can restrict who can send you Dms to people you follow or no one at all.

CCing my calckey account: @fedizen

#DMs #FediverseModeration #FediverseImprovements #Fediverse #TrustAndSafety #Safety #Moderation #Akkoma

RE: https://ihatebeinga.live/objects/5eb69ecf-e5bb-4c06-930a-65e99da388fa
Akkoma

Open question to the Relatica community, or potential Relatica users in the fediverse. I'm implementing user-side filtering right now, which is unfortunately not something in Friendica and would be harder for me to implement there than client side. That's things like put posts behind a spoiler type banner if they have certain hashtags or hide them entirely if they come from a specific domain. It'll actually allow for more complex combinations of filtering on authors, content, hashtags, and domains. Like one could have a filters that do: "Hide posts from User X with Hashtags A, B, C" and "Put a warning card up for posts with these keywords in the post body from domains that end with *.social". My question comes for if this should be an app-wide setting or a per-account setting, for users with multiple accounts. Because the type of accounts people have could be radically different I'm thinking it should be per-account. Thoughts? #relatica #friendica #fediverse #moderation #FediverseModeration
Akkoma

@ariadne @spreadmastodon This seems to be a good idea for the regular users, but journalists and anyone with a larger following another platform is not going to be impressed by the crickets they receive when they first start. I notice that "popular" social media users stick with are ones like bluesky and substack|notes that give them a lot of engagement like they are used to. I wonder if there can be separate tracks. Average user gets what you describe, but someone with a larger audience, gets something else. Automated filters might be useful for someone with a larger audience without greylisting their fanbase/readers/consituents. I speak of someone not knowing anything about activitypub, networking or programmer so...I don't know if something like automation could be implemented. Maybe something at the client side for moderators to review at a later time without disturbing celebrity/influencer/governement_official/etc. when they first join?

#Fediverse #FediverseModeration #FediverseImprovements #FediverseSuggestions #MastodonImprovements #MastodonSuggestions #Mastodon #Meta
Akkoma

Im really excited about having two new moderators joining us here at IOCX to keep the instance friendly, clean and a good place in the larger Fediverse.

Please welcome @troed and @tellyworth to the fam. Reach out if you have any issues whatsoever and we will be there to try and help.

Have a good week!

#iocx #FediverseModeration #Moderation