EU: We gonna switch from Microsoft to Linux.
Linux: hold my beer...
#eu #microsoft #switch #linux #bug #dmesg #kernel #bug #crash #driver #buggy #fault #faulty #failure #flimsy #unstable #prototype #mockup #potemkinvillage #realitycheck #ux #brittle #fragile #unpredictable #unreliable
Large Language Models (LLMs) can be helpful for literature search and summarisation, but retracted articles can confuse them. This article asks three open weights (offline) LLMs whether 161 high profile retracted articles had been retracted, performing a similar check for a benchmark multidisciplinary set of 34,070 non-retracted articles. Based on titles and abstracts, in over 80% of cases the LLMs claimed that a retracted article had not been retracted (GPT OSS 120B: 82%; Gemma 3 27B: 84%; DeepSeek R1 72B: 88%). The reasons given for a correct retraction declaration were often wrong, even if detailed. This confirms that LLMs have little ability to distinguish between valid and retracted studies, unless they are allowed to, and do, check online. For the benchmark test, there were only 55 false retraction claims from 34,070 non-retracted full text articles, and 28 false claims when only the title and abstract were entered, suggesting that there is only a small chance that LLMs discount valid studies. When retractions are erroneously claimed, this does not seem to be due to mistakes in the article. Overall, the results give new reasons to be cautious about LLM claims about academic findings.
Karel 'Clock' K.
Joseph Lim 
Katharine O'Moore-Klopf, ELS
Ars Technica News
CBC Saskatchewan
CBC Nova Scotia
Follow GOLF
Osna.FM
