Here's a counter-intuitive claim: adoption of data centers could make electricity *cheaper* for everyone, *if* we deploy battery storage widely.
https://www.volts.wtf/p/sooner-than-you-think-electricity
The main points of this argument are:
- A large portion of your electricity bill is a service fee for grid management, not the electricity itself.
- If we can buffer electricity with batteries, in dispersed locations on the grid, the grid will have substantial additional capacity, with no new wires.
- Adding these batteries doesn't cost much, as infrastructure development projects go.
- Bringing more paying customers on the grid without paying much more to increase grid capacity will bring the service costs down for current users.
There is nothing here about whether the additional electricity is generated from carbon-free or fossil sources. This is a separate important additional consideration. We know that wind and solar are cheaper than oil, coal, or gas (or maybe ties with gas) so renewable would reduce costs the most.
Impeccable logic. Flies in the face of intuition. Thoughts?
Sooner than you think, electricity is going to be cheap, abundant, and boring
How batteries can enable big new loads like data centers to reduce electricity rates and increase grid reliability.



