Defence asks Windsor judge to dismiss torture case due to delay after trial has finished
After an abduction and torture trial finished and before the judge has released his decision, a Windsor defence lawyer made formal arguments Monday asking that all charges against the accused be dismissed.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/windsor/torture-case-defence-asks-for-dismissal-9.7227340?cmp=rss

When Your Job Ends Badly: How to Explain It to the Next Employer

Getting fired is never easy. Being dismissed unfairly or pressured to resign is even harder. The real challenge comes in the next job interview: do you tell the full story and risk sounding bitter or accusatory, or do you avoid the topic and risk appearing evasive, insecure, or even dishonest? Many candidates fall into one of these traps.

Understand the Interviewer’s Perspective

Before preparing an explanation, it helps to understand what interviewers are actually looking for. Most hiring managers do not expect candidates to have perfect careers. Layoffs happen. Managers change. Companies make poor decisions. Internal politics exist. People occasionally become casualties of situations they did not create.

What concerns employers is not the event itself. It is how the candidate presents it. Fair or unfair, the question in their mind is simple: “Can this person move forward professionally?”

If someone spends ten minutes attacking former colleagues, using emotional language, or sounding angry, interviewers may conclude: “This person brings conflict with him”—even if the candidate is completely right.

Professional communication sometimes requires accepting an unpleasant reality: perception matters as much as facts.

Avoid the Mistakes Most People Make

Many candidates instinctively overexplain. For example: “I was fired because my manager disliked me. HR ignored the evidence. I documented everything. Three colleagues supported me. The company violated procedures and treated me unfairly.”

Some of that may well be true. But the issue isn’t accuracy—it’s impact. Lengthy, defensive explanations often raise more questions than they answer. Interviewers immediately start wondering:

  • Why is this person still emotionally invested?
  • What am I not being told?

Overly detailed accounts can unintentionally make you appear defensive or embroiled in conflict, rather than professional and composed.

On the other hand, some candidates try to cover up the issue with vague explanations:

“It was restructuring.”

“The commute was too long.”

“I resigned for family reasons.”

The problem isn’t the excuse itself—it’s the dishonesty behind it. If an employer later discovers the truth, a difficult situation becomes far worse. Factual dishonesty erodes trust more deeply than the termination itself ever could.

Deal with the Issue Professionally

Use This Structure

Simplifying is not the same as lying. Here’s a practical framework for addressing sensitive departures in a professional way:

  • Present the situation briefly: Summarize what happened in one sentence.
  • Provide neutral context: Frame the situation without blame.
  • Mention what you learned: Show reflection and growth.
  • Focus on the future: Connect the experience to your goals and the role at hand.

This approach keeps the conversation emotionally neutral and forward-looking.

Example:  

“I left my previous role after a situation where expectations and fit were not aligned. While I felt the outcome was unfair, I reflected carefully and learned a great deal about communication and alignment. Since then, I’ve focused on finding environments where expectations and culture are clearer—one reason this opportunity appeals to me.”

Notice what this does:

  • Acknowledges the issue without hiding it.
  • Avoids accusations or blame.
  • Keeps individuals out of the narrative.
  • Demonstrates self-awareness and reflection.
  • Moves toward the future with a constructive focus.

Separate Injustice from Emotion

This may be the hardest step. If you truly were treated unfairly, frustration is natural. Yet interviews are not therapy sessions. You can acknowledge reality without carrying emotional weight into the conversation.

Instead of saying:

“My manager targeted me from day one and manipulated the situation.”

Try this:

“The role and I turned out not to be the right fit, and while I didn’t agree with how it ended, I learned a lot from the experience.”

The meaning remains similar, but the tone shifts entirely. Professional language reduces heat, conveys composure, and strengthens credibility.

Show Ownership  

This can feel unfair, because the instinctive thought is: “But I did nothing wrong.” And perhaps you didn’t. Yet employers value candidates who demonstrate reflection more than those who focus on self‑justification.

Even in unjust situations, there are usually questions worth asking:

  • Could communication have been clearer?
  • Were warning signs visible earlier?
  • Could expectations have been aligned sooner?
  • Were there lessons about company culture?

Ownership does not mean accepting false blame. It means showing that difficult experiences made you wiser, not just angrier.

Prepare and Rehearse

Candidates often underestimate how emotional this topic can feel at the moment. What sounds calm in your head may come out differently under interview pressure. That’s why rehearsal matters.

Practice your explanation aloud until it feels natural. Aim to keep it concise—about 30 to 60 seconds. That’s short enough to deliver with confidence, yet long enough to show transparency and composure.

The best step, of course, is to engage a career coach who can guide you safely through this narrow passage between saying too much and saying too little.

Final thought

Career setbacks are not unusual. Unfair career setbacks are not unusual either. Companies make mistakes. Managers make mistakes. Organizational politics create risks. Consequently, good employees sometimes become collateral damage.

Future employers understand this more than people think. What they usually evaluate is not whether something unfair happened. They evaluate whether you can discuss an unfair experience with professionalism, composure, and perspective.

That is often the difference between sounding like someone trapped in the past and someone prepared for the next opportunity.

Good luck!

You May Also Like:

Do you want to get new posts directly to your mailbox? Subscribe here.

Do you need my personal assistance? Simply send me your resume and a link to your LinkedIn profile at [email protected] and I will come back to you!

#career #careerAdvice #dismissal #interview #interviewTips #jobInterview #JobSearch #unfair
2nd Surrey Police Board member resigns in wake of chief's ouster
The fallout from the dismissal of Surrey, B.C.'s police chief continued Thursday, with the resignation of another member of the city's police board.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/james-carwana-resigns-surrey-police-board-9.7224053?cmp=rss

#Arsenal fired kitman for opposing genocide. Reinstate Mark #Bonnick

Christmas Eve 2024, Arsenal #Football Club sacked Mark Bonnick, kitman of 22 years, for #SocialMedia posting in support of #Palestine

His #dismissal followed a coordinated online smear campaign by #pro-Israel accounts falsely accusing him of #antisemitism

Arsenal’s own appeal decision admitted the club had never found his posts to be antisemitic. They #fired him anyway

https://the.organise.network/campaigns/6633?utm_source=mastodon_fediverse

#genocide #Israel #WarCrimes

Arsenal fired their kitman for opposing genocide. Reinstate Mark Bonnick.

Add your name:

Liverpool has made a surprising decision to part ways with head coach Arne Slot, effective immediately. The club confirmed on Saturday that preparations and the... https://news.osna.fm/?p=48483 | #news #arne #coaching #despite #dismissal
Shock Dismissal: Liverpool Slashes Arne Slot from Coaching Role Despite Winning Season - Osna.FM

Arne Slot suddenly departs Liverpool! Discover the shocking details and who the Reds will appoint next.

Osna.FM

@HardBeingGreen
I think you’ve hit the nail on the head here… anger and blame game seems to be driving people’s political choices. It’s also a reflection of the frustration brought about by a freakingly unimpressive #Labor govt. What kind of majority does a party need to be more progressive these days? It very much feels like #AlboPM is offloading all of his pent-up resentment for the #Dismissal with #anger and #hate aimed at the #LNP (responsible for cutting his early career short) and the #Greens (for stealing labour votes). It’s beyond sad, it’s freaking disgusting to use Labor voter’s trust in that way IMO.

/‘nuff_said/
#AusPol

Following the rejection of a relief premium by the Federal Council, the League of Left (Linke) has called for fast financial relief through alternative measures... https://news.osna.fm/?p=45118 | #news #bonus #cash #demands #dismissal
Green Left Demands Energy Cash and 9-Euro Ticket Following Dismissal of Relief Bonus - Osna.FM

A 150€ energy crisis payment, the return of the 9-Euro ticket, and a windfall tax on oil giants..

Osna.FM

Total Wine Fails to Circumvent Texas Patent Suit in California

Total Wine & More can’t escape a Texas lawsuit over mobile app patents by filing a new lawsuit in California that seeks declaratory judgment of noninfring…
#wine #CaliforniaWine #california #californiawine #declaratoryjudgment #dismissal #invaliditydefense #mobileapplications #patentablesubjectmatter #softwarepatents #venue #Wine
https://www.diningandcooking.com/2604345/total-wine-fails-to-circumvent-texas-patent-suit-in-california/

U.S. DOJ seeks to toss convictions of Oath Keepers, Proud Boys for Jan. 6
In court filings, prosecutors asked a federal appeals court to vacate the seditious conspiracy convictions so that the government can permanently dismiss the indictments.
#USNews #january6 #OathKeepers #ProudBoys
https://globalnews.ca/news/11801544/jan-6-oath-keepers-proud-boys-seditious-conspiracy-toss-doj/

Is it a Normal Human Thing to go through life feeling never listened to, always dismissed, and generally treated like a foolish child and/or hysterical woman?

Like, I had "I'm so unique! I'm so special!" pretty well beaten out of me, so I thought we were all on the same page here re: speaking and listening to each other in good faith???

But more and more it just feels like I'm screaming at a pile of rocks only to have psycho-babble weaponized against me: take your meds, control your emotions, you're playing the victim, you're projecting (I'M projecting?!), that's not how it is in the real world, you're naive, you live in a bubble, grow up, check your privilege, get a grip, open your eyes, you think you're so smart

It's so fucking exhausting. And it's really confusing when I'm over here giving people the benefit of the doubt and, again, "good faith" assumption… Am I projecting? Am I an elitist snob? I guess we'll never know because people don't ever respond to what I say, they just start yelling at me and telling me what a terrible person I am.

I'd really really really like to not be Forever Alone(tm). But it's looking more and more like that's how my life is going to turn out. But is that normal? And whose fault is it? Mathematically the majority must be correct, so I MUST be the problematic idiot, right? And yet… with my last remaining crumb of self-respect… I can't quite believe that. I'm not perfect, but I'm also not STUPID enough for this many people to be ignoring what I'm actually saying and talking over me.


#autism #adhd #audhd #dismissal #invalidation #it's-about-to-drive-me-over-the-edge #like-this-is-me-being-HUMBLE-and-RATIONAL #you-haven't-SEEN-me-being-a-snob #but-if-we're-all-just-being-screaming-bullies-to-each-other-instead-of-having-actual-conversations...