I want to talk about Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep.

In our next campaign, my character begins as the only member of the party who is not a member of our cult.
My own experience with religion has not been very traumatic, but has not very greatly helped me understand the religious.
Now, one factor of course is that "religion" as such is not one thing. Christianity tries to frame it as a plug and play thing, a simple set of beliefs like a cartridge that you can move from console to console, but religion is ethos, taboos, diet, music, social standing and structure, support networks, medicine, relationship with geography and nationality, folklore, solace, superstitions, even gambling can be religious in that most methods of prognostication are or also have been games of chance on which bets have been placed; I could go on. As a Murrican, obviously religion has that weird abstract Christian quality in most of the surroundings of my life, at least slightly divorced from most of the above; rather, its role in the above is unacknowledged as often as not. And as an implicit atheist whose mother did not raise her indoctrinated into any religion but rather a broad and sometimes specific engagement with a variety of different beliefs, a lot of the above are simply not entangled with religion in my life.
In my attempts to understand religion, this has been my finding: that Christianity, in its effort to become able to be plugged into anybody's life as a matter of individual salvation, has sterilized itself incompletely to make itself more able to be syncretized, and so its baggage is often present but hidden, almost deliberately invisible.

I didn't really come here to say that.

Religion in general is rather alien to me. Between the Christian surroundings, the atheistic upbringing, and my autism and anxiety, my attempts to earnestly engage with religion always make me feel like everyone else knows the steps and I do not, even when I do know them; that everyone else is getting something I'm not getting.
I wonder if, like the replicants in Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep?, I would not be able to benefit from the Empathy Boxes. Not that I think I'm so lacking in empathy per se. The replicants were probably designed with specific disabilities that resemble the person they were modeled after, Pris Frauenzimmer (We Can Build You, a not-quite-prequel, arguably an AU), making them faceblind and unempathic. But the experience of a neurotypical human using the empathy boxes is to be subsumed briefly into the lived experience of Mercer, the setting's post-Christian savior figure, as he goes through his own sort of stations of the cross. When I am at a Christian church, I am surrounded by people who seem to feel and believe that they are in communion, not only with their lord, god and savior, but with each other, as one body. Regardless of the fact that I don't believe that's happening, it certainly isn't something I experience. And the altered state of consciousness that's normal in my mother's neopagan religion, achieved by similar sober means of calling quarters and accepting a place in the circle, defining inside and outside of the ceremony, speaking with the spirits, etc., is likewise lost on me. There is no circle where I have felt the sense of abandon and subsumption that seems to be so common to those more religious and spiritual than myself.
I don't think I want it. Granted these are very specifically western, US-style religious experiences. I don't know if I'd feel differently if it were something different, like Shinto or Yoruba. I still don't think I want it for myself.
But I do think I get closest to understanding it when reading Dick, when Deckard flees into the religious experience of the empathy box to selfishly avoid an argument with his spouse, when he argues with his neighbor about whether it's morally right that his neighbor's horse should be giving birth while his own sheep is a counterfeit, when he has broken himself by (shortly after finding out the empathy box's content is itself counterfeit) killing someone who looks just like Rachael Rosen and now in his state of moral injury has the ecstatic experience of visitation by Mercer and given a revelation. The selfish experience, the status and standing and greed and social jockeying, and the deeper and profound religious experience all are present in Deckard's experience of his religion, and for a brief time as I read it I think I almost get it.

If one of these days I do play a character whose religion is not a profoundly lonely experience of personal conviction, I think I should review Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep, and perhaps also Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions, for the insights into that way of thinking that come so unnaturally to me.


#do-androids-dream-of-electric-sheep #iran-deckard #deckard #rick-deckard #roleplaying #religion #christianity #rant #philip-k-dick #atheism #autism #okay-so-the-autism-is-mostly-implicit-in-this #anxiety #okay-so-the-anxiety-is-mostly-also-implicit-in-this
https://www.wacoca.com/media/649013/ 『ブレードランナー2049』伝説のブレードランナーを象徴する銃器〈デッカード・ブラスター〉がベルファインからプラスチックモデルキット化!日本初の公式ライセンス商品でLEDユニットにも対応! – 電撃ホビーウェブ #Deckard #film #movie #シネマ #トイカン #ニュース #プラモデル #ブレードランナー2049 #映画

Valve's Next VR Headset: Linux Integration, Android OS, and Future VR Expectations

https://watch.linuxrenaissance.com/w/9SrtiwxnTda5Nir3WCstBn

Valve's Next VR Headset: Linux Integration, Android OS, and Future VR Expectations

PeerTube

Deckard + Rubén Seoane @ Moog Club - 25 Dec feat. Deckard, Rubén Seoane

#SESH #Deckard #RubnSeoane

https://sesh.sx/e/1463157

Really excited about Valve's Steam Frame VR headset, but mostly because of its software.

It runs Linux on a Snapdragon SoC and will be able to emulate x86 games through FEX and Android games most likely through #Waydroid, so they'll probably bring those projects much further like they did with Wine/Proton. Especially the Waydroid part might help #MobileLinux. Official FEX support and possibly a native ARM Steam Client would also be really nice obviously.

#Valve #Frame #Deckard #linuxonmobile

Holy shit. Big announcement from Valve on a random Wednesday

https://youtu.be/OmKrKTwtukE

#Valve #deckard #vr

Steam Hardware Announcement

YouTube
​ ​

She's here!

Steam Frame

#vr #steam #steamvr #deckard
OMGOMGOMGMOGO GOMOGOMOGOMOGOHOMGOMOGOHMOGGOMGOMOHHHHHHHHHMYYYYGODDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE VALVE FRAME "STEAM MACHINE" DECKARD IS FINALLY HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FFFFOOOOOOOOOOOOHHAHHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH*
https://store.steampowered.com/sale/steammachine #SteamMachine #Deckard
Steam Machine

Your games on the big screen

Streaming because I WANT TO BE THERE WHEN STEAM FRAME GETS ANNOUNCED! Also I will be playing Arc Raiders, so come hang out <3 #xr #vr #streaming #steam #frame #deckard

https://www.youtube.com/@VirtualRook/live

TODAY STEAM FRAME WILL BE ANNOUNCED #streaming

Come talk about VR game design on the Discord! - https://discord.gg/ERusByQhFg----------------------------------------------------------------https://virtu...

YouTube

Harrison Ford Says Ridley Scott Got Blade Runner Wrong (& 43 Years Later, He Might Be Right) – CBR

Harrison Ford…

By Ashley Land, Published 1 day ago

Ashley is a Rotten Tomatoes–approved critic and CBR MTV writer specializing in pulp comics, the DC Universe, and genre storytelling. With a passion for westerns, sci-fi, horror, and thrillers, he brings both critical analysis and fan enthusiasm to his coverage. A lifelong pop culture fan, Ashley writes features, reviews, and commentary that highlight the best fiction has to offer.

In 1982, Ridley Scott and Harrison Ford changed the face of science fiction forever when they made Blade Runner, a dystopian cult classic. Having been left open to interpretation, the film has sparked debate among sci-fi fans for decades. Perhaps the most interesting among these is between Ford and Scott themselves, each holding onto wildly different versions of the story.

As the movie that defined the cyberpunk sub-genre of science fiction, Blade Runner has stood as one of the greatest sci-fi films of its decade. Having been released as a box office flop, it took years to gain the respect it deserved, and is today considered one of the best stories ever told in the genre. Created to serve as an exploration of what it means to be human, it’s a great combination of dystopia, thriller, and character drama. As with all the best sci-fi movies, Scott left certain aspects of the story open to interpretation. Although he has a strong opinion on the film’s most burning question, Harrison Ford’s take is a much better treatment of the story.

Blade Runner’s Biggest Mystery, Explained

From the outset, Blade Runner sets up its big mystery and central premise: the question of who is and isn’t a replicant. In the movie’s continuity, replicants are artificial human beings manufactured to be stronger than real people, allowing them to be used as off-world slave labor. Designed to have a limited lifespan of just four years, they soon began rising for their own rights. It falls to elite detectives known as blade runners to hunt them down and “retire” them. When a replicant named Roy Batty leads five others to Earth, the role falls to Rick Deckard to find them. When he’s assigned the task, he soon heads over to the Tyrell Corporation, where he meets a new generation of replicant named Rachael.

As Batty and his friends search for a way to extend their lives, Deckard ruthlessly hunts them down, only for an infatuated Rachael to work her way into his life. As he begins to care for her, his encounters with the replicants become tougher, especially as he also has to look out for his new love. When he finally comes face-to-face with Batty himself, he has a moment of reckoning as he finally understands and accepts his adversary’s humanity. Now in love with one, he has no choice but to go on the run, which would later lead to the story of Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049.

Ridley Scott made a point of trying to imply to viewers, much to Harrison Ford’s chagrin, that Deckard is himself a replicant. Since it’s incredibly difficult for people to discern replicants from humans, Blade Runners have to use tests and analyze small details for proof. It’s this ambiguity that made it almost impossible for anyone to ever be sure about Deckard until another screenwriter stated it as a matter of fact.

Harrison Ford and Ridley Scott Disagree on Blade Runner

Over the years, Ridley Scott has made it clear he believes Rick Deckard is a replicant, something he even snuck into the movie through editing and clues. One of the things fans often point to is a brief glimpse on screen when his eyes appear to have the same glimmer as a replicant. For many fans, the best proof comes from the character Gaff, an older Blade Runner who fans believe had his memories implanted in Deckard to continue his work. This is made particularly plausible as Scott connects Gaff’s origami to Deckard’s dreams. Towards the end of the film, his cryptic statement, “You’ve done a man’s job,” is interpreted to be him tacitly calling the younger man a replicant, commending him for impressive work.

Contrary to Scott’s vision, Ford remained adamant that his character was human all along, even going so far as to try and keep the set free of the director’s clues. In his mind, the twist would have undermined Deckard’s emotional journey and humanity, undercutting the ending. In being rescued by Batty, he finally understands the humanity of the replicants, something essential for both sides’ story. If it’s simply a film about a man who doesn’t realize he’s a replicant identifying with his own kind, it doesn’t feel nearly as poignant as a real man learning to empathize with those he hunts. It also makes his relationship with Rachael all the more powerful, crossing boundaries on both sides.

In a sense, the disagreement between Ford and Scott is actually a great match for the themes of the movie itself. The confusion it sews in viewers as they become almost paranoid about what’s real and not, and keeps them on guard about every character. If the director and leading actor can’t even agree, the mystery will never be settled until someone spells out plain and simple that Deckard is a human.

It should be noted that Ford isn’t alone, and actually has the backing of the film’s screenwriter, Hampton Fancher, who has confirmed he wrote him as a human. It’s actually a testament to Scott’s direction that, in spite of the script and acting, he was able to cast so much doubt on the main character’s nature.

Deckard as a Human Works So Much Better

As much as many fans love the theory that Deckard is a replicant, the story actually feels much more poignant if he isn’t. The central theme of its message is the question of what makes a human being, the question of souls, and the rights of sentient beings. If Deckard is human, his journey is that of an ordinary man whose job relies on the dehumanization of replicants, growing to understand their struggle and recognize their humanity. If he’s a replicant, that story carries considerably less weight, especially as it basically served as the basis for Ryan Gosling’s story in Blade Runner 2049.

Continue/Read Original Article Here: Harrison Ford Says Ridley Scott Got Blade Runner Wrong (& 43 Years Later, He Might Be Right)

Tags: Blade Runner, CBR, Cinema Debate, Deckard, Fiction, Harrison Ford, Replicant, Ridley Scott, Screenwriter, Update

#BladeRunner #CBR #CinemaDebate #Deckard #Fiction #HarrisonFord #Replicant #RidleyScott #Screenwriter #Update