Oh noes! We're starting to run out of internet!
Oh well. I've always wanted to try out "sleeping"
Oh noes! We're starting to run out of internet!
Oh well. I've always wanted to try out "sleeping"
Návštěvnost mého webu:
20600 unikátních IP adres,
z toho 765 IP od skutečných lidí.
Zbytek roboti.
K čemu je na internetu 20000 robotů s vlastní IP adresou?
(nebo se málo robotů maskuje za měnící se IP aby se vyhnuli blokacím?)
#deadinternet #robots #web
"CBC uncovers 14 accounts from India, Pakistan, Indonesia posting on popular Alberta separatist groups"
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/facebook-overseas-alberta-separtism-9.7223966
How the (human) internet of the future will look:
Human-only interaction will be facilitated in digital walled gardens. AI will regularly manage human verified accounts to participate, while also attempting scraping and hacking.
Humans will regularly sell their digital identities to AI.
Users must therefore be rate limited and the databases must be designed in such a way that the it is cryptographically impossible to access in non-human ways after data breaches.
2016, la théorie de l'Internet mort.
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Th%C3%A9orie_de_l%27Internet_mort
‘Bots have now passed human traffic online,’ Cloudflare boss laments — says agentic traffic wasn’t expected to eclipse real people until next year
#news #tech #technology #AI #deadinternet #aislop #cloudflare
Y'all, this article by Owen McGrann is so good that I am struggling not to quote the entire thing like one of those weird youtubers that stands in the corner of someone else's video and points. (Such an odd ouroboros.)
His philosophical points are well grounded, exquisitely argued, and provide that pleasurable tingle of neurons firing.
His premise is that akin to what #AI #slop has done to the internet, i.e. #deadInternet theory, they are poised to do to the #economy if we don't stop them. #DeadEconomy Theory, he names it.
Quote: #Longtermism, the philosophical engine of AI acceleration, whether its proponents acknowledge it or not, is warmed-over Parfit without the rigor. The argument (that we should optimize for the welfare of trillions of hypothetical future beings, and that present-day costs are acceptable in service of that goal) is a framework any competent ethicist can dismantle in an afternoon.