The Crossfire: Identity Confusion in Culture Wars

2,167 words, 11 minutes read time.

Marcus wasn’t a soft man. He had spent his twenties turning wrenches in a diesel shop, trading the skin on his knuckles for a steady paycheck until his back started locking up. Now at thirty-five, he was a project manager for a regional logistics firm, navigating supply chain bottlenecks, burning through phone batteries, and keeping demanding clients from blowing a gasket. He had a mortgage that kept him up at night, two kids who looked to him for everything, and a marriage he desperately wanted to protect from the exhaustion of modern life. He knew how to grind. He knew how to handle pressure.

But tonight, the pressure was coming through a five-inch screen.

It was 10:42 PM. The house was dead quiet except for the hum of the refrigerator. Marcus sat in his home office, the blue glow of his phone cutting through the dark. He was staring at a timeline that felt increasingly toxic, and right at the top of it was his brother, Jack.

They had grown up sharing a bunk bed, hunting in the same woods, and sitting in the same church pews. But lately, Jack had weaponized his feed. He spent his evenings dropping passive-aggressive “Christian memes” like digital cruise missiles, wrapping political anger in Christian vocabulary, explicitly designed to destroy and humiliate anyone he didn’t agree with. To Jack, a mocking graphic with a Bible verse slapped on the bottom was a holy act of war.

Tonight, Jack had posted a particularly brutal one, taking a scorched-earth shot at a local community issue.

Beneath it, the comment section was an absolute slaughterhouse. On one side, guys from Marcus’s weekly men’s group were cheering Jack on, dropping fire emojis and treating the mockery like a spiritual victory. On the other side, two of Marcus’s clients—men he respected, men who kept food on his family’s table—were firing back with deep-seated disgust, painting everyone with faith as an ignorant, hateful caricature.

Marcus felt like he was standing naked in no-man’s-land.

If he didn’t hit “like” or back his brother up in the comments, Jack would corner him at Sunday dinner, quietly questioning his courage and asking if he’d gone “soft.” If he didn’t distance himself from this kind of behavior at the office on Monday, his corporate reputation was shot. He was exhausted from trying to figure out which uniform he was supposed to wear. Was he a culture warrior? A corporate asset? A passive bystander?

His phone buzzed in his hand. A direct text message from Jack: “You see my latest post? You’re being awfully quiet out there, bro. Time to stand up for the truth.”

Marcus looked down at his calloused thumbs. He felt a hollow, heavy ache in his chest—a sudden, sharp realization of how deep the trap ran. The world wanted him angry. His own blood wanted him to pull the trigger on a digital sniper rifle.

His thumb hovered over the text thread. He could type a quick, non-committal response to keep the peace, he could jump into the digital mud to prove his loyalty, or he could shut the phone off entirely and face the fallout on Sunday.

He looked toward the hallway, where his wife and children were sleeping, relying on him to lead them through a world that was losing its mind.

Marcus held his breath, his thumb suspended over the screen.

– – –

Author’s Note

It is a tragic reality that many modern churches, the world, and many Christians, will readily accept what I call a “meme pastor”—those select few who post vile, judgmental memes online or constantly argue for harsh, unyielding judgments. These people are characterized by a dangerous heart posture: they search the Bible not for personal learning, and not for spiritual discernment, but exclusively for judgmental clobber passages. They tear scriptures out of their historical context and linguistic framework to prove their point, carrying zero concern for the severe spiritual damage they leave in their wake. They are exactly like the Pharisees who prayed on the street corners to be seen by men. Jesus leveled the verdict on them clearly: they have already received their reward in full.

I once watched a woman who has been divorced and remarried multiple times set herself up as an absolute judge and jury against a male-to-female transgender individual online. The irony was deafening. She is the modern-day “Woman at the Well”—a person intimately acquainted with brokenness and relational wreckage—yet she completely failed to extend a single ounce of the grace that was once given to her. Instead of offering living water, she chose to sit in the absolute comfort of her keyboard and spit pure, unadulterated vile. She didn’t want to rescue a soul; she just wanted to execute someone from behind a screen.

I’m not throwing stones from a glass house here. I’m writing this because I’ve been exactly where Marcus is, and in my own growth in Christ, I’ve stood on both sides of this digital battlefield.

I know what it’s like to play the role of the online sniper—I was once even called a Nazi inside a Christian group for drawing a line in the sand. But my posture has radically changed. Having felt the weight of my own brokenness, I now see how vital it is to actively stand up for the marginalized—the LGBTQ+ community, the poor, the modern-day tax collectors, and the societal outcasts—and intentionally offer them the exact same unmerited, life-altering grace that God extends to me on a daily basis.

If the Gospel isn’t big enough to cover them, it isn’t big enough to cover me or you.

But let’s be entirely straight up: when we weaponize our faith to destroy people online, we are guilty of castrating the Gospel. We trade the rugged, self-sacrificial mandate of Christ for a cheap, digital participation trophy. We think we are fighting a holy war, but we are actually just hiding behind a polished, fake Christianity because it’s easier to drop a mocking meme than it is to bleed for the broken.

We need to wake up to a brutal truth: you cannot meme, argue, or berate a heart of stone into a heart of flesh. Only God can change a human heart. Scripture is clear in Proverbs 21:1 that “The king’s heart is a stream of water in the hand of the Lord; he turns it wherever he will,” and it is God alone who promises in Ezekiel 36:26, “I will give you a new heart… I will remove from you your heart of stone.” When we try to force that change through digital execution, we are stepping into holy territory and getting in God’s way.

And let’s be perfectly clear about the danger here: getting between God and His sovereign will is a terrifying place for a man to stand.

Throughout Scripture, whenever men tried to force God’s hand, take His timeline into their own hands, or block His path, they weren’t met with a promotion—they were met with His wrath. You do not want to be found fighting against the very God you claim to serve.

The Seduction of the Counterfeit Crusade

It is fundamentally easier to be a culture warrior than it is to be a servant. True agape love requires a massive expenditure of physical energy, financial cost, and emotional endurance. If you are going to climb into the chariot with the eunuch or bandage the wounds of a man bleeding in the dirt, it is going to cost you something tangible—your time, your reputation, or your bank account.

Online engagement, however, offers a dangerous, low-cost counterfeit. When a man fires off a mocking meme or a devastating theological takedown, his brain receives an immediate hit of dopamine. He feels the rush of “winning.” He feels powerful. He convinces himself that he is standing up for the truth, but biologically and spiritually, he is just self-medicating his own passivity.

We have substituted the grueling, unpolished work of the cross for a digital colosseum where we get to watch people we dislike get torn apart, all while convincing ourselves we are doing God a favor. It allows a man to feel like a soldier without ever having to step into a real conflict or risk his own comfort.

The Pharisaic Need for an Enemy

In Matthew 23, Jesus doesn’t attack the Pharisees because their theology is entirely wrong; He attacks them because their hearts are completely devoid of mercy. The strict, unyielding judgment of the Law of Moses requires an “out-group”—a visible enemy—to validate the “in-group’s” righteousness.

When a man lacks a deep, authentic identity rooted in the finished work of the Cross, he will naturally look for identity through opposition. He defines who he is by pointing aggressively at who he is not. He stands in the digital temple, scrolling his feed, essentially praying the prayer of the Pharisee in Luke 18:11: “God, I thank you that I am not like other men.”

The moment your faith requires the public destruction, mockery, or alienation of another human being to feel valid, you are no longer operating in the Spirit of Christ. You are operating in the spirit of the accuser.

Our actual mission isn’t to win a cultural shouting match; it is to get down in the dirt and the blood to love the truly impoverished, the marginalized, and the rejects of society. Look at Acts 8, where the Spirit commands Philip to go to the desert road to meet the Ethiopian eunuch—a man completely excluded by religious law from entering the assembly of God, reading a scroll he couldn’t understand. Philip didn’t shout at him from across the road or mock his ignorance. He ran to his side, climbed into his chariot, met him exactly where he was, and brought him the good news of Christ.

Now, let’s be clear—our culture is full of unjustified claims of victimization, and we need correct discernment to see through the noise. But Christ and His disciples modeled a flawless judgment that allowed them to see the genuine, raw pain of the forgotten and deploy their lives to reach them, not to score points on a timeline.

The Spiritual Law of Symmetry

What should terrify every single one of us is the sobering reality of Matthew 7:2: “For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and with the measure you use it will be measured to you.” If you want to judge others by the strict, unyielding standard of the Law of Moses, then God is going to hold your unpolished, broken life to that exact same standard. If you want to live by the digital sword, you will die by it.

Think about the wreckage we cause when we forget this. Jesus gave a terrifying warning in Matthew 18:6 about anyone who causes one of the little ones who believes in Him to stumble: “it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea.” When our online rage, our mocking memes, and our religious arrogance cause seekers or weak brothers to stumble away from Christ, we aren’t accumulating crowns in heaven—we are tying a millstone around our own necks.

We have become like the Pharisees in Matthew 23:15, where Jesus levels the ultimate indictment: “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you travel across sea and land to make a single proselyte, and when he becomes a proselyte, you make him twice as much a child of hell as yourselves.” We are training men to convert to a political tribe rather than a crucified Savior, making them twice the sons of hell, consumed by the same tribal hatred we are.

It all culminates just a few verses later in Matthew 7:21-23, where men who thought they were doing “mighty works” in His name are met with the most terrifying verdict in all of Scripture: “I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.” They had the vocabulary, they had the public performance, but they lacked the actual DNA of the King.

Given the choice, I would rather stand before God having chosen an agape style of love that ran toward the chariot of the truly marginalized, rather than a life marked by internet judgmentalism.

Look at the wreckage of your own secret struggles, your own temper, and your own fears. When you stand before the King, do you want Him to see a man who loved like He did, or a man who hid behind a screen and demanded a standard he couldn’t keep?

Is that the kind of man you want to be?

D. Bryan King

Sources

• Proverbs 21:1 – Bible Gateway
• Ezekiel 36:26 – Bible Gateway
• Acts 8 – Bible Gateway
• Matthew 7:2 – Bible Gateway
• Matthew 18:6 – Bible Gateway
• Matthew 23:15 – Bible Gateway
• Matthew 7:21-23 – Bible Gateway
• Luke 18:11 – Bible Gateway
• Strong’s G26 – Agape Lexicon Study
• The Danger of the Judgmental Heart – Desiring God
• The Gospel and the Culture War – The Gospel Coalition
• The Seduction of Internet Outrage – Christianity Today
• Pastoring in the Age of the Internet Outrage Machine – 9Marks
• He Turns the King’s Heart – Ligonier Ministries
• What Does It Mean That God Will Give Us a New Heart? – Crossway
• The Law of Spiritual Symmetry – Bible Tools
• What is the Meaning of a Millstone Around the Neck? – GotQuestions
• The Anatomy of Christian Culture Wars – Commentary Magazine
• Taking Bible Verses Out of Context – Answers in Genesis
• The Digital Colosseum – First Things
• The Ethics of Online Engagement for Christians – Biola University
• The Pharisee Within Us – Dallas Theological Seminary
• Handling Scripture Responsibly – Reformed Theological Seminary
• The Heart of Flesh – Charles Spurgeon Archive

Disclaimer:

The views and opinions expressed in this post are solely those of the author. The information provided is based on personal research, experience, and understanding of the subject matter at the time of writing. Readers should consult relevant experts or authorities for specific guidance related to their unique situations.

The Real Sin of Sodom: Why It’s Not What You Think (And Why It Matters for Men)

3,066 words, 16 minutes read time.

Introduction

If you grew up anywhere near a pew or a Sunday School classroom, you know the shorthand version of Sodom and Gomorrah. It is usually presented as the ultimate horror movie of the Old Testament—fire from the sky, a pillar of salt, and a divine airstrike on a city consumed by sexual perversion. For generations, this narrative has been weaponized as the “clobber passage” of choice, a blunt instrument used almost exclusively to condemn homosexuality. The logic, as it is often presented in the modern culture war, is linear and simple: Sodom was full of gay men, God hates that, so God burned it down. If you stay straight, you stay safe from the fire.

But here is the problem with that interpretation: it is lazy, it is incomplete, and frankly, it lets the rest of us off the hook. When we reduce the catastrophe of the Pentapolis—the five cities of the plain—to a single issue of sexual preference, we miss the terrifying structural rot that actually brought the hammer down. We miss the fact that the sins of Sodom are likely alive and well in our own hearts, our own economies, and our own neighborhoods.

I am not here to water down Scripture or tell you that the Bible is silent on sexual ethics. It isn’t. But I am here to tell you that if you think the destruction of Sodom was solely about what happened in the bedroom, you are missing the much scarier point about what was happening at the city gate. As men, we like to think we are logical. We like to think we can analyze a situation, identify the threat, and neutralize it. But when we look at Genesis 18 and 19, along with the haunting commentary of the Prophets and the gritty details of the Midrash, we find a threat profile that looks a lot less like a pride parade and a lot more like a society consumed by narcissism, greed, and a violent hatred of the outsider.

In this study, we are going to open up the hood of this ancient narrative. We are going to look at the Hebrew text, the rabbinic history, and the prophetic commentary found in Ezekiel. We are going to look at the “Five Cities” not just as a geography of sin, but as a warning flare for every man who considers himself a leader. We are going to explore three specific areas: the institutionalized cruelty described in historical tradition, the mob violence that reveals a crisis of masculinity, and the cosmic boundary-crossing that provoked a divine war.

This isn’t about being politically correct. It is about being biblically accurate. If we want to understand why God obliterates a civilization, we need to understand the full blast radius of their rebellion. It turns out, the story of Sodom is not just a story about sex; it is a story about what happens when men stop being protectors and start being predators. It is a story about the collapse of hospitality, which in the ancient world was the bedrock of human survival. And it is a challenge to you and me: are we building cities of refuge, or are we building engines of destruction? Let’s get to work.

The Pentapolis and the Architecture of Cruelty

To understand the magnitude of what happened in Genesis 19, we first have to understand the geopolitical landscape. We aren’t just talking about two bad towns. We are talking about the Pentapolis—a coalition of five city-states in the Jordan Valley: Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, Zeboiim, and Bela (later known as Zoar). When Lot, Abraham’s nephew, first scouted this real estate in Genesis 13, he didn’t see a hellscape. The text says he saw that the plain of Jordan was “well watered everywhere… like the garden of the Lord.” This was prime territory. It was lush, profitable, and fundamentally rich. These cities were the ancient equivalent of a booming tech hub or a luxurious trade capital. They had everything a man could want: resources, security, and wealth.

However, wealth without character acts like gasoline on a fire. When we dig into the extra-biblical sources—specifically the Midrash (ancient Jewish commentary) and the writings of historians like Josephus—we get a picture of Sodom that goes far beyond sexual deviancy. The rabbis taught that the people of Sodom were not just lustful; they were radically, violently anti-social. They viewed their wealth as a zero-sum game. If they shared a crumb of bread with a stranger, they believed they were diminishing their own stack.

There is a harrowing account in the Midrash (Pirkei De-Rabbi Eliezer) that describes the legal system of Sodom. They didn’t just have bad habits; they had bad laws. It was allegedly illegal to give food to a traveler. The logic was cold and protectionist: “We have gold, we have gems, we have food. If we let strangers in, they will deplete our resources.” This wasn’t just a lack of charity; it was institutionalized xenophobia.

One story from the Talmud (Sanhedrin 109a) tells of a young girl in Sodom who had the audacity to feed a starving stranger. She hid bread in her water pitcher to sneak it to him. When the men of the city caught her, they didn’t just scold her. They stripped her, covered her body in honey, and tied her to the city wall so that bees and wasps would sting her to death. The cry of that girl, tradition says, is what finally caused God to say, “Enough.”

Now, look at that through the lens of a man. This isn’t just “sin” in the abstract. This is a total failure of masculine duty. Men are designed to protect the weak, to provide for the destitute, and to guard the perimeter. The men of Sodom used their strength to torture the benevolent and crush the needy. They built a society on the premise that “might makes right” and that compassion is a weakness.

When we turn to the Prophet Ezekiel, this profile is confirmed explicitly. In Ezekiel 16:49-50, God acts as the coroner, giving us the official cause of death for Sodom. He doesn’t start with sexual acts. He says: “Look, this was the iniquity of your sister Sodom: She and her daughter had pride, fullness of food, and abundance of idleness; neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy.”

Read that again. Pride. Gluttony. Laziness. A refusal to help the poor. That sounds uncomfortably like the modern West, doesn’t it? The sexual perversion that followed was a symptom, not the root cause. When a society becomes so arrogant that it believes it owes nothing to anyone, when men become so fat and happy that they lose their warrior edge and their compassionate heart, perversion is the inevitable result. They became so self-absorbed that other human beings ceased to be people made in God’s image and became mere objects—either threats to be eliminated or toys to be used.

The destruction of the five cities (saving Zoar, which was spared for Lot’s sake) was a judgment on a culture that had inverted the divine order. Hospitality, in the ancient Near East, was the highest virtue. To welcome a stranger was to welcome God. To abuse a stranger was to declare war on God. Sodom didn’t just close the door; they booby-trapped the porch. As men, we have to ask ourselves: What is the culture of our own homes? Are we hoarding our resources, suspicious of every need, and obsessed with our own comfort? Or are we strengthening the hand of the poor? If we focus only on the sexual sins of Sodom, we might miss the fact that our own pride and greed are piling up kindling for the fire.

The Mob at the Door vs. The Man at the Gate

The narrative climax in Genesis 19 is one of the most tense standoffs in literature. Two angels, disguised as men, arrive at the gate of Sodom. Lot is sitting there. In that culture, sitting at the gate wasn’t just loitering; it meant Lot had attained some level of status or civic function. He was a judge or an elder. When he sees these strangers, his instinct—likely learned from his uncle Abraham—kicks in. He insists they come under his roof. He knows the streets aren’t safe. He knows the character of his neighbors.

What happens next is the scene that everyone remembers, but few analyze correctly. The text says, “The men of the city, the men of Sodom, both old and young, all the people from every quarter, surrounded the house.” (Genesis 19:4). Note the totality of it. It wasn’t a fringe group of deviants. It was the entire male population. It was the culture.

They demand that Lot bring the visitors out so they can “know” them (Yada in Hebrew, which implies sexual intimacy). This is the “clobber” verse. But let’s apply some tactical logic here. This is a mob. Mob violence, especially sexual violence in a time of war or conquest, is rarely about attraction. It is about domination. In the ancient world, to sexually penetrate a man was to demote him to the status of a woman. It was a way of stripping a warrior of his honor. The men of Sodom weren’t looking for a date; they were looking to humiliate these newcomers who dared to enter their territory without permission. It was a power play.

This is where the interpretation of “God destroying them for being gay” falls apart structurally. Homosexuality, as a modern identity, suggests a relationship or an orientation. What was happening in Sodom was gang rape used as a weapon of terror. It was extreme violence. It was the total collapse of the “neighbor” principle.

But look at Lot. Lot is a complicated figure. The New Testament calls him “righteous Lot,” but in Genesis, he seems weak. He offers his two virgin daughters to the mob to buy time. This is horrific to our modern ears, and frankly, it was horrific then, too. It shows how deeply the toxic culture of Sodom had seeped into Lot’s own mind—he was willing to sacrifice his own children to satisfy the demands of the mob and the laws of hospitality. It was a desperate, failed attempt at negotiation by a man who was in over his head.

The contrast here is between the mob and the protector. The men of Sodom had abandoned their role as protectors entirely. They had become a collective beast. There is a terrifying psychology to a mob. Individual responsibility vanishes. Conscience is outsourced to the group. When men get together and abandon their moral compass, they are capable of atrocities they would never commit alone.

This scene challenges us to look at our own definition of masculinity. The men of Sodom thought they were strong. They thought they were asserting their dominance over these two strangers. But in reality, they were weak. True strength is controlled. True strength opens the door to the vulnerable; it doesn’t break the door down to exploit the innocent.

The tragedy of this scene is the absence of men. There were plenty of males, but there were no men. There was no one to stand up and say, “This is wrong.” Even Lot, who tried, was compromised. He was the “foxhole buddy” who didn’t clean his rifle often enough, and when the firefight started, his weapon jammed. He had lived in Sodom too long. He had tolerated the culture of cruelty for the sake of his comfort, and when the bill came due, he almost lost his family.

The lesson here isn’t just “don’t be gay.” The lesson is “don’t be a coward.” Don’t be a part of the mob. Don’t let the culture of your city dictate your morality. If you are the only man standing at the door protecting the vulnerable from the horde, you are on God’s side. The men of Sodom were unified, but they were unified in evil. Brotherhood is a powerful thing, but brotherhood without righteousness is just a gang. And God has no patience for gangs that prey on the weak.

Strange Flesh and the Cosmic Boundary

We have looked at the social sin (cruelty) and the psychological sin (mob violence), but we must also address the spiritual dimension. The New Testament book of Jude adds a fascinating, if slightly cryptic, layer to this. Jude 1:7 says that Sodom and Gomorrah “gave themselves over to sexual immorality and went after strange flesh.” The Greek phrase here is heteros sarx—literally “other flesh” or “different flesh.”

While this certainly includes the violation of the natural sexual order, many theologians point out that the context involves angels. The men of Sodom were trying to engage sexually with divine beings. This echoes the weird, ancient rebellion of Genesis 6, where boundaries between the spiritual and the physical were crossed.

Why does this matter to a study for men? Because it speaks to the concept of limits. The essence of the Sodom mindset was that there were no boundaries they could not cross. They believed they were gods in their own city. They believed they could take whatever they wanted—money, food, bodies, and even the supernatural messengers of the Most High.

A godly man is defined by his boundaries. He knows there are lines he does not cross. He knows there is a difference between the sacred and the profane. He respects the “otherness” of things. He respects the dignity of his wife, the innocence of his children, and the sovereignty of his God. The men of Sodom had absolutely zero self-control. They saw something they wanted, and they swarmed it.

This “strange flesh” concept is about the ultimate hubris. It is the belief that “I am the center of the universe, and every atom in existence is there for my pleasure.” That is the spirit of the age we live in today. We are told that our desires are the ultimate truth. If we want it, we should have it. If we feel it, it must be right. Sodom is the endpoint of that philosophy. When you remove all boundaries, you don’t get freedom; you get fire.

The destruction that followed—the brimstone and fire—was a re-creation event. It was God un-creating a spot of earth that had become so toxic it could no longer be allowed to exist. It was a surgical strike to remove a cancer. The text says the “smoke of the country went up as the smoke of a furnace.” It was total.

But notice who got out. Lot, his wife, and his two daughters. And then, tragically, Lot’s wife looks back. Why did she look back? It wasn’t just curiosity. She missed it. She missed her home, her status, her comfort. She was physically leaving the city, but her heart was still in the zip code. She turned into a pillar of salt—a monument to indecision.

For us, the warning is clear: You cannot walk with God and keep looking back at the life of “pride, fullness of bread, and idleness.” You have to choose. The boundary line has been drawn. The men of Sodom crossed every line until they crossed the final one—God’s patience. We are called to be men who respect the lines God has drawn, understanding that those boundaries aren’t there to kill our joy, but to keep us from destroying ourselves.

Conclusion

So, what do we do with Sodom and Gomorrah? If we stop using it merely as a weapon in the culture wars, does it lose its power? On the contrary, it becomes infinitely more dangerous to our own egos.

If the story was only about God destroying a specific demographic of people, we could close our Bibles, pat ourselves on the back for being “normal,” and go about our day. But once we understand that the sin of Sodom was a cocktail of arrogance, greed, violent xenophobia, and the abuse of the weak, suddenly the target is painted on our own chests.

The spirit of Sodom is the spirit of the closed door. It is the spirit that says, “I have mine, you get yours.” It is the spirit that uses power to exploit rather than protect. It is the spirit that consumes resources without strengthening the hand of the poor. As men, we are called to be the anti-Sodom. We are called to be the Abraham interceding on the hill. We are called to be the protectors at the gate. We are called to cultivate a hospitality that is so radical it scares the world.

When Jesus sent out his disciples in Matthew 10, He told them that if a city did not receive them—if it did not show hospitality—it would be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrah in the day of judgment than for that city. Think about that. The ultimate litmus test wasn’t their sexual politics; it was their reception of the King’s ambassadors. It was the hardness of their hearts.

Let’s be men who build cities of refuge, not cities of destruction. Let’s be men who open the door, who feed the hungry, and who stand between the mob and the innocent. The fire is coming for everything that is built on pride and selfishness. Make sure you are building with something fireproof.

Call to Action

If this study encouraged you, don’t just scroll on. Subscribe for more bible studies, share a comment about what God is teaching you, or reach out and tell me what you’re reflecting on today. Let’s grow in faith together.

D. Bryan King

Sources

• Genesis 19 (Sefaria – Hebrew/English)
• Ezekiel 16:49-50 (Bible Gateway)
• Jude 1:7 (Bible Gateway)
• Babylonian Talmud: Sanhedrin 109a
• Pirkei De-Rabbi Eliezer (Midrash)
• Josephus: Antiquities of the Jews, Book 1
• Jewish Virtual Library: Sodom and Gomorrah
• David Guzik Commentary on Genesis 19
• Matthew Henry’s Commentary on the Whole Bible (Genesis 19)
• Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges: Genesis 19
• Adam Clarke Commentary
• Zondervan Academic: What Really Happened at Sodom?

Disclaimer:

The views and opinions expressed in this post are solely those of the author. The information provided is based on personal research, experience, and understanding of the subject matter at the time of writing. Readers should consult relevant experts or authorities for specific guidance related to their unique situations.

#Admah #ancientLaws #ancientNearEastCulture #angelsInSodom #BibleCommentary #biblicalBoundaries #BiblicalHistory #biblicalInterpretation #biblicalJustice #BiblicalLeadership #biblicalManhood #ChristianTheologyForMen #CitiesOfThePlain #clobberPassages #crueltyOfSodom #culturalApologetics #divineJudgment #divineWrath #Ezekiel16 #fireAndBrimstone #Genesis19 #gluttonyAndIdleness #GodSJudgment #hardBiblePassages #helpingThePoor #hermeneutics #homosexualityInTheBible #hospitalityInTheBible #hospitalityLaws #JewishCommentarySodom #Jude7StrangeFlesh #LotAndAbraham #LotSittingAtTheGate #LotSWife #masculineResponsibility #menSBibleStudy #menSMinistryTopics #mobViolenceInBible #OldTestamentStudy #PentapolisArchaeology #pillarOfSalt #prophetsOnSodom #protectingFamily #protectingTheWeak #realSinOfSodom #sermonOnSodom #sexualEthics #sinOfPride #sinOfSodom #SodomAndGomorrah #SodomAndGomorrahExplained #SodomMidrash #spiritualWarfare #toxicMasculinityVsBiblicalManhood #truthAboutSodom #xenophobiaInBible #Zeboiim #Zoar

This #Film May #ChangeYourMind About #Homosexuality and the #Bible — If You Watch It.

The documentary makes a #detailed #argument that #Biblical #references to #homosexuality may be intentional #mistranslations.

That’s right: The #film #argues that the so-called “#clobberpassages” in the #Bible used to #justify #discrimination may not have originally said what people think they do

#Women #Transgender #LGBTQ #LGBTQIA #Entertainment #Movies #Representation #Culture

https://www.moviemaker.com/1946-homosexuality-bible-sharon-rocky-roggio/