AI SparkupAmazon이 Perplexity Comet을 막은 이유, “사용자 허락”만으론 부족했다
Amazon이 Perplexity Comet AI 에이전트에 대한 예비 금지 명령을 받아냈습니다. 사용자가 동의해도 플랫폼 허가 없이는 AI 에이전트가 접근할 수 없다는 새로운 법적 기준이 등장했습니다.
The Victorian News
Jonathan Kamens 86 47I would like to believe that if the US federal government weren't completely fucked up right now then OpenAI and the other AI parasites with a nexus in the US would have been criminally charged by now with violating the #CFAA by actively circumventing the crawling protections added recently to websites specifically to block them.
Alas, the government is too busy engaging in vindictive prosecution of #Trump's enemies who aren't actively bribing him.
#infosec #AI
Ref: https://darmstadt.social/@claudius/115436859378534835
Alas, the government is too busy engaging in vindictive prosecution of #Trump's enemies who aren't actively bribing him.
#infosec #AI
Ref: https://darmstadt.social/@claudius/115436859378534835
Claudius 🎃 (@[email protected])
@[email protected] AI companies crawl our websites. We ask that they stop by using the industry standard robots.txt AI companies ignore those rules. We start blocking the companies themselves with conventional tools like IP rules. AI companies start working around those blocks. We invent ways to specifically make life harder for their crawlers (stuff like Anubis). AI companies put considerable resources into circumventing that, too. This industry seriously needs to implode. Fast.
Krzysztof KołaczJon Prosser przegapia termin – Apple kontynuuje proces bez jego udziału
Sąd Okręgowy Północnej Kalifornii przyjął wniosek Apple o rozpoczęcie postępowania przeciwko Jonowi Prosserowi bez jego reprezentacji.
YouTuber, znany z przecieków o produktach Apple, nie złożył w terminie odpowiedzi na pozew dotyczący wycieku danych z wewnętrznych narzędzi firmy.
Apple pozwało Prosssera i Michaela Ramacciottiego w lipcu, zarzucając im ujawnienie tajemnic handlowych oraz złamanie ustawy o oszustwach komputerowych (CFAA). Według pozwu, Ramacciotti miał włamać się na tzw. Development iPhone należący do byłego pracownika Apple, Ethana Lipnika, a następnie przekazać dane Prosserowi.
Prosser miał wykorzystać te materiały do stworzenia filmów na YouTube, w których ujawnił elementy nowego projektu interfejsu – Liquid Design, wprowadzonego później w iOS 26. Apple twierdzi, że Prosser zarobił na publikacji poufnych informacji dzięki przychodom z reklam.
Co dalej?
Prosser nie zareagował na pozew w wyznaczonym terminie, dlatego sąd uznał tzw. default, co pozwala Apple kontynuować sprawę bez jego udziału. Ramacciotti uzyskał natomiast przedłużenie terminu do 17 października.
Prosser może jeszcze wnioskować o uchylenie decyzji, jeśli udowodni tzw. „usprawiedliwione zaniedbanie”, jednak brak reakcji jego prawników budzi wątpliwości co do dalszej obrony.
Jeśli sytuacja się nie zmieni, sąd może wydać wyrok zaoczny na korzyść Apple.
Jon Prosser nie pęka. Pozwany przez Apple, odpowiada przeciekiem na temat iPhone’a 17 Pro
#Apple #CFAA #ios26 #JonProsser #LiquidDesign #procesApple #przeciekiApple #tajemnicehandlowe #technologia #wyciekiApple #YouTubeLeaks
DavidCorrect me if I'm wrong, US #lawfedi, but I'm pretty sure @404mediaco is right that every case of of the landlords accessing the (prospective) tenants' workplace logins is a #CFAA violation, because employees are not legally entitled to authorize the landlord to log into the employers' systems, so the landlords are exceeding their authorized access.
PrivacyDigestRyanair’s #CFAA Claim Against Booking.com Has Nothing To Do with Actual #Hacking
#ryanair #Bookingcom #security
Ryanair’s CFAA Claim Against Booking.com Has Nothing To Do with Actual Hacking
The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) is supposed to be about attacks on computer systems. It is not, as a federal district court suggested in Ryanair v. Booking.com, applicable when someone uses valid login credentials to access information to which those credentials provide access. Now that the...
petersuber"Musk’s #DOGE Goons Surreptitiously Transmitted Reams of White House Data. Musk’s team installed a Starlink Wi-Fi terminal on top of the White House, allowing them to bypass data-tracking security measures."
https://www.thedailybeast.com/elon-musks-doge-goons-surreptitiously-transmitted-reams-of-white-house-data/
PS: This looks like it violates a handful of serious federal laws. But will the Trump #DOJ prosecute? Even investigate? Trump could pardon all the DOGE players or simply direct their nonprosecution. Or if the Trump-Musk spat continues, he could press for max penalties under law. If he doesn't, could it be that there's evidence of his own approval or involvement? What data was transmitted and who has copies now?
#Espionage #CFAA #Musk #Trump #Theft #USLaw #USPol #USPolitics
Glyn MoodyIn A Monday Night Declaration, The White House Admits #Musk And #DOGE Violated The #CFAA (Although They Might Not Realize It) - https://www.techdirt.com/2025/02/18/in-a-monday-night-declaration-the-white-house-admits-musk-and-doge-violated-the-cfaa-although-they-might-not-realize-it/
In A Monday Night Declaration, The White House Admits Musk And DOGE Violated The CFAA (Although They Might Not Realize It)
Suing Elon Musk and DOGE has finally led to at least one thing: the White House now finally defining Musk’s role in government. On Monday night, in the New Mexico v. Musk, it claimed him as a “an e…
Zhi Zhu 🕸️When It’s Not Just A Coup But A CFAA Violation Too
https://www.techdirt.com/2025/02/04/when-its-not-just-a-coup-but-a-cfaa-violation-too/
"Elon Musk, and everyone on his DOGE team accessing the federal government’s computer infrastructure, is potentially personally liable for violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)."
#ElonMusk #Coup #Musk #Politics #Law #CFAA #Tech #Technology #Government #Trump #Treasury #OPM #GSA #US #USA #News
Update. Cathy Gellis (@cathygellis) supports my hunch that the Muskovite action violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (#CFAA).
https://www.techdirt.com/2025/02/04/when-its-not-just-a-coup-but-a-cfaa-violation-too/