@lfa it sounds like people can express they DON'T want their works to be used in Al training via #AIPreferences , and that #CCSignal is for people that do want their work to be used in specific ways.

A great many people already post their work to the public domain, or creative commons: #AllRightsReversed , #CopyLeft or via similar licenses.

If #AiPreferences already supports the #NoAI preference then it makes sense to me to offer content creators #CcSignals for more fine tune control.

I'm not alone, almost everyone is very disappointed with the Creative Commons Signal proposal.

"This is all so *very* wrong"
https://github.com/creativecommons/cc-signals/discussions/21

"You are burning the trust of your actual supporters"
https://github.com/creativecommons/cc-signals/discussions/31

#CreativeCommons #ccsignal #ai #llm #FreeCulture #culture

This is all so *very* wrong. · creativecommons cc-signals · Discussion #21

(copied from #14) Problem This whole idea is completely and utterly wrong. Description Inviting AI scrapers to negotiate licensing terms for CC works is like a flock of sheep holding a summit to dr...

GitHub

I'm sure you've heard about the #CreativeCommons new #CCSignal initiative.

This is the only “signal” I want to send to #AI leechers.

EDIT because in my haste I had forgotten the image description.

EDIT 2: check downthreads for download links to the original SVG by yours truly.

#noAI