George Macgregor"Automated subject #cataloging assigns controlled #vocabulary headings to #bibliographic records, but #LCSH has no standard public benchmark. We introduce LCSHBench: 22,346 books in 15 languages from the openly licensed Harvard, Columbia, and Princeton #catalogs [...] we release per-catalog provenance plus union and unanimous answer views."
LCSHBench: A Multilingual, Consensus-Grounded Benchmark for Library of Congress Subject Heading Assignment https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04382 #metadata #discovery
LCSHBench: A Multilingual, Consensus-Grounded Benchmark for Library of Congress Subject Heading Assignment
Automated subject cataloging assigns controlledvocabulary headings to bibliographic records, but LCSH has no standard public benchmark. We introduce LCSHBench: 22,346 books in 15 languages from the openly licensed Harvard, Columbia, and Princeton catalogs. Records enter only when at least two independent cataloging agencies assigned LCSH; we release per-catalog provenance plus union and unanimous answer views. A concordance study of 465,187 works cataloged by all three libraries shows why this design matters: libraries usually agree on the underlying topic (93.3% share a concept-level heading) but often differ in exact expression (39.4% have identical heading sets). LCSHBench therefore scores both exact and concept matches, with set and rank metrics broken down by language and heading type, across open-vocabulary generation and full-vocabulary retrieval. As a first demonstration, a low-rank fine-tune of a 300M on-device embedder improves cross-lingual retrieval and beats a 3,072-dimensional hosted embedder on development exact recall@200 (0.659 vs 0.623). The language panel shows the gain is not uniform, and held-out-test and end-to-end confirmation remain future work.
German Virtual Observatory
Billboard [Unofficial]
Clayton Hove