The Drivers of the Decline in Supermassive Black Hole Growth at z < 2: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ae173d -> Chandra Resolves Why #BlackHoles Hit the Brakes on Growth: https://chandra.si.edu/press/26_releases/press_032426.html / https://chandra.si.edu/photo/2026/bhgrowth/ -> Chandra Explains Why Black Hole Growth Slowed Since Cosmic Noon: https://chandra.si.edu/blog/node/954
The Drivers of the Decline in Supermassive Black Hole Growth at z < 2

The Drivers of the Decline in Supermassive Black Hole Growth at z < 2, Yu, Zhibo, Brandt, W. N., Zou, Fan, Luo, Bin, Ni, Qingling, Schneider, D. P., Vito, Fabio

Can someone help me fix the Wikipedia page on the black hole information paradox (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_information_paradox)? It says

> the black hole radiates mass at a rate given by dM/dt = -aT⁴ where a is constant related to fundamental constants, including the Stefan–Boltzmann constant and certain properties of the black hole spacetime called its greybody factors.

The next paragraph says that M is inversely proportional to T and that the black hole evaporates in time proportional to M³. But this isn't consistent because solving dM/dt = -a/M⁴ gives an evaporation time proportional to M⁵.

I think it's the first formula that's wrong and it should be dM/dt = -aT². But I don't know quite enough to feel confident making an edit. Is there someone out there who knows what the fix should be?

#Physics #BlackHole #BlackHoles

Black hole information paradox - Wikipedia

The long‑term tracking of star S2 orbiting Sagittarius A* continues to be one of the most compelling confirmations of General Relativity. Over 27 years of observations show a clear Schwarzschild precession: the orbit doesn’t close but slowly rotates due to the intense curvature of spacetime near the supermassive black hole.
A beautiful example of how precision astronomy can test fundamental physics.

#Astrophysics #GeneralRelativity #BlackHoles #Science

New in the #VirtualObservatory: “Compilation of optical tidal disruption events” by Langis D.A. et al.
https://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/cat/J/A+A/707/A171
#XRaySources #Accretion #BlackHoles #ActiveGalacticNuclei
VizieR J/A+A/707/A171

VizieR catalogues

A Sense of Doubt blog post-3914 - MOVING BLACK HOLES??? And Math and Black Holes. https://sensedoubt.blogspot.com/2026/03/a-sense-of-doubt-blog-post-3914-moving.html #blackholes #space #math #science
Do black holes exist and, if not, what have we really been looking at? #Science #Space #Cosmology #blackholes #cosmology #spaceexploration
https://purescience.news/article?id=958685
Do black holes exist and, if not, what have we really been looking at?

Black holes are so strange that physicists have long wondered if they are quite what they seem. Now we are set to find out if they are instead gravastars, fuzzballs or something else entirely

Pure Science News
Do black holes exist and, if not, what have we really been looking at? #Science #Space #Cosmology #blackholes #cosmology #spaceexploration
https://purescience.news/article?id=958685
Do black holes exist and, if not, what have we really been looking at?

Black holes are so strange that physicists have long wondered if they are quite what they seem. Now we are set to find out if they are instead gravastars, fuzzballs or something else entirely

Pure Science News
Could a Primordial Black Hole Explain that Mysterious Neutrino? #Science #Space #Astrophysics #BlackHoles #Neutrinos #Cosmology
https://purescience.news/article?id=958810
Could a Primordial Black Hole Explain that Mysterious Neutrino?

If a new proposal by MIT physicists bears out, the recent detection of a record-setting neutrino could be the first evidence of elusive Hawking radiation.

Pure Science News