What the hell? Illegal residence and solidarity are criminalised!

This is deeply saddening. I am both furious and sad.

The Lower House of the Netherlands has agreed to a law that criminalises undocumented residency โ€” as well as helping those in this situation. The Senate can still stop this. If there is any decency left in this country, this disgusting bill will never become law.

https://nos.nl/artikel/2573574-meerderheid-tweede-kamer-stemt-na-chaotisch-verloop-toch-in-met-strengere-asielwetten

#FreedomOfMovement #NoOneIsIlegal #Asylum #AsylumLaw #Netherlands

Meerderheid Tweede Kamer stemt na chaotisch verloop toch in met strengere asielwetten

De wetten zijn nog gemaakt door toenmalig PVV-minister Faber en zijn bedoeld om in Nederland "het strengste asielbeleid ooit" in te voeren.

๐Ÿšง Extended Suspension of Asylum Law at the #EU's Eastern #Border

On May 21 in #Poland Sejm voted overwhelmingly (366 MPs in favor) to extend a controversial #AsylumLaw for an additional 60 days, preventing those entering via Belarus from seeking asylum.

Read on the context of the Polish asylum law & #MigrationPolicy: https://linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7333113117725323264/

#EUBorder #MigrationRoute #LegalProtection #HumanRights #BorderObserver

#asylumlaw #humanrights #eulaw #poland #migrationpolicy #ruleoflawโ€ฆ | Aleksandra Samonek

๐Ÿšง ๐˜Œ๐˜น๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜š๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ˆ๐˜ด๐˜บ๐˜ญ๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ ๐˜“๐˜ข๐˜ธ ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜Œ๐˜œโ€™๐˜ด ๐˜Œ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฏ ๐˜‰๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ On 21 May 2025, the ๐—ฃ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ต ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ท๐—บ ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐—น๐˜† (366 MPs in favor) to ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฌ ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜†๐˜€ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜†๐—น๐˜‚๐—บ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜„, which bars individuals entering Poland irregularly from Belarus from seeking asylum. This extension prolongs a legal regime that entered into force in March 2025, initially for 60 days only. Despite early reservations, President Andrzej Duda signed the law in March 2024, framing it as a necessary step to safeguard Polandโ€™s borders against โ€œhybrid threatsโ€ โ€” a position tacitly supported by the European Commission, which emphasized the need for temporary, proportionate, and well-defined measures amid geopolitical tensions. The lawโ€™s critics, including prominent human rights organizations and UNHCR Poland legal partners such as Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights, Fundacja Ocalenie | Ocalenie Foundation, Association for Legal Intervention, Instytut na Rzecz Paล„stwa Prawa, Nomada Association, and others, described the measure as ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€. Multiple critical legal opinions highlighted how the lawโ€™s sweeping generalizations about people on the move dangerously obscure the humanitarian crisis unfolding on the border, where multiple reports of violence and deaths have emerged. Legal experts warn that this law represents a perilous ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ณ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ that undermine the rule of law and fundamental rights. By stripping vulnerable individuals of the right to seek asylum, Poland risks not only contravening its constitutional obligations but also violating binding EU and international legal standards. This case exposes a critical tension in asylum law enforcement at the EUโ€™s borders: ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ต๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜๐˜€ of those fleeing persecution. As the Polish government doubles down on restrictive measures, more attention is needed from the international community to scrutinize such policies through the lens of legality, proportionality, and humanity. #AsylumLaw #HumanRights #EUlaw #Poland #MigrationPolicy #RuleOfLaw #Migration #BorderControl #BorderManagement #Refugees #HumanitariansAtWork #LegalNews #LegalProtection Image credit: Newsweek. Refugee in Usnarz Gรณrny, Poland, in August 2021.

Discriminatory measures adopted in respect of women by the #Taliban
regime constitute acts of #persecution https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2024-10/cp240167en.pdf

#ECJ #asylumlaw #Afghanistan

As though the British military occupation of Diego Garcia in the Chagos Islands wasn't shameful enough, since 2021 dozens of Tamil refugees from Sri Lanka who arrived by boat have been detained in a tiny enclosure in tents - and the UK govt says international conventions on asylum don't apply there. Our own Guantanamo Bay.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-68326365

#DiegoGarcia #Tamils #AsylumUK #RefugeeLaw #AsylumLaw #InternationalHumanRights #ChagosIslands #SriLanka #BritishArmy #UKpol

Diego Garcia asylum seekers feel unsafe on remote British island territory

A group of 61 held in a camp on Diego Garcia tell UN inspectors of sexual assaults, rat bites and self-harm.

BBC News
Asylum procedures: the obligation to provide the common information
leaflet and to conduct a personal interview concerns all Member States;
the risk of indirect refoulement is not, as a rule, examined by the second
Member State seised https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2023-11/cp230182en.pdf
#ECJ #AsylumLaw
Prejudiciรซle vragen over artikel 33, tweede lid, onder d, Procedurerichtlijn (niet ontvankelijk verklaren opvolgende aiselaanvraag) > Conclusie AG Emiliou https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/NL/ALL/?uri=CELEX:62022CC0216
#ECJ #AsylumLaw
EUR-Lex - 62022CC0216 - EN - EUR-Lex

De Duitse rechter stelt het EU HvJ prejudiciรซle vragen over de gevolgen van het ***niet*** niet ontvankelijk mogen verklaren van een asielverzoek van een statushouder uit een andere LS
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/NL/ALL/?uri=CELEX:62023CN0288
#ECJ #asylumlaw
EUR-Lex - 62023CN0288 - EN - EUR-Lex

De Oostenrijkse rechter stelt het EU HvJ prejudiciรซle vragen over het begrip "specifieke sociale groep" (Richtlijn 2011/95; artikel 10, eerste lid, onder d, KwalRi)
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/NL/ALL/?uri=CELEX:62023CN0217
#ECJ #asylumlaw
EUR-Lex - 62023CN0217 - EN - EUR-Lex

De Duitse rechter stelt het EU HvJ prejudiciรซle vragen over de ontvankelijkheid van een asielverzoek nadat een eerder asielverzoek in een andere LS definitief ongegrond is verklaard (Richtlijn 2013/32; artikel 2q PRi & 33, tweede lid, onder d PRi)

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/NL/ALL/?uri=CELEX:62023CN0123 & https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/NL/ALL/?uri=CELEX:62023CN0202

#ECJ #asylumlaw

EUR-Lex - 62023CN0123 - EN - EUR-Lex

Intrekking en weigering van de vluchtelingenstatus: het Hof van Justitie
verduidelijkt onder welke voorwaarden een dergelijke maatregel kan worden
genomen ten aanzien van een derdelander die is veroordeeld voor een misdrijf. https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2023-07/cp230115nl.pdf
#ECJ #asylumlaw #refoulement #returndecision