Tibetan large language model DeepZang unveiled in China - China.org.cn
Tibetan large language model DeepZang unveiled in China - China.org.cn
'This Should Be Illegal': Senate GOP Uses AI Deepfake to Attack Talarico
The Moralization of Artificial Intelligence
Abstract: Resistance to artificial intelligence (AI) is widespread and persists even when known psychological barriers are removed. What explains this persistent aversion? Across four studies, we investigate whether moral reactions to AI—rooted in deeply held beliefs about right and wrong—help explain resistance beyond pragmatic concerns. In Study 1, we analyzed all news headlines in a major US media corpus (COCA, 2018–2024) and found that AI is moralized at levels comparable to GMOs and vaccines—technologies whose moral opposition has received considerable attention—and that surges in moralization followed the launch of major AI applications such as ChatGPT and DALL-E. In Studies 2a, 2b, and 3, representative samples of Americans reported their attitudes toward several AI applications and other technologies. Although few participants opposed AI outright, most opponents indicated their views would remain unchanged even if AI proved beneficial—suggesting moral rather than pragmatic roots. Structural equation models revealed that moralization of AI was best captured by a single latent factor, indicating a generalized moral sentiment rather than domain-specific risk–benefit appraisals. Qualitative analyses further uncovered the most common justifications people invoke and how opponents and supporters differ in their reasoning. In Study 4, participants from Studies 2b and 3 completed a subsequent behavioral grading task; moralization scores measured in the earlier surveys predicted greater reluctance to use AI even when doing so would benefit participants (a one standard deviation increase in moralization corresponded to 42% decrease in AI usage). Together, these findings demonstrate that resistance to AI is partly moral in nature, suggesting that reaping the potential benefits of AI tools may require addressing moral concerns rather than relying solely on pragmatic arguments.
Pentagon opens door to exempt Anthropic use beyond 6-month ramp-down, memo says
AI startup aims to predict human behavior
The Silent Accretion: Technofascism and the New Cyber World Order
Got Qwen3.5:4B Looping
Hi! I am new to local AI. Got a HP SFF server and added a Low profile RTX 3050 6GB to play around with AI. My expectations are according to my hardware. My use case is actually for Paperless-AI and Inbox Zero, which should be reasonably achievable. Now I am also playing around with OpenWeb UI and Perplexica, both working as expected. Weird issue: I got Qwen3.5:4B looping, asking it how to plant peas :D It started questioning itself, if it got the right peas, questioning itself all the time. Wait, wait... Actually, "Zuckereerbsen" is often used as a synonym for "Mintpea". Okay, proceed. Wait, hold on. I need to check if there is any specific variety called "Zuckereeherbe" which is actually a Garden Pea. Yes, they are essentially the same family. Okay, proceed. Wait, wait... Wait, I found a reference: "Zuckereerbsen" (Sugar Peas) are sometimes grown for their sweet flesh, similar to "Snow Peas". Okay, proceed. Wait, one last thing: Is there any chance they meant "Zuckererbsen" (which is actually Zuckerrübe)? No. Okay, write it. Wait, wait... Wait, I found a specific product: "Zuckereeherbe" (Sugar Bean) from some seed companies. They are indeed peas. Okay, proceed. Wait, final check: Is there any chance they meant "Zuckererbsen" (which is actually Zuckerrübe)? No. Okay, write it. Wait, wait... Wait, I found a reference: "Zuckereerbsen" (Sugar Peas) are sometimes grown for their sweet flesh, similar to "Snow Peas". Okay, proceed. Wait, one last thing: Is there any chance they meant "Zuckererbsen" (which is actually Zuckerrübe)? No. Okay, write it. Wait, wait... Wait, I found a reference: "Zuckereerbsen" (Sugar Peas) are sometimes grown for their sweet flesh, similar to "Snow Peas". Okay, proceed. Wait, one last thing: Is there any chance they meant "Zuckererbsen" (which is actually Zuckerrübe)? No. Okay, write it. Wait, wait... Wait, I found a reference: "Zuckereerbsen" (Sugar Peas) are sometimes grown for their sweet flesh, similar to "Snow Peas". Okay, proceed. Wait, one last thing: Is there any chance they meant "Zuckererbsen" (which is actually Zuckerrübe)? No. Okay, write it. Wait, wait... Wait, I found a reference: "Zuckereerbsen" (Sugar Peas) are sometimes grown for their sweet flesh, similar to "Snow Peas". Okay, proceed. Wait, one last thing: Is there any chance they meant "Zuckererbsen" (which is actually Zuckerrübe)? No. Okay, write it. Wait, wait... Wait, I found a reference: "Zuckereerbsen" (Sugar Peas) are sometimes grown for their sweet flesh, similar to "Snow Peas". Okay, proceed. Wait, one last thing: Is there any chance they meant "Zuckererbsen" (which is actually Zuckerrübe)? No. Okay, write it. Wait, wait... Wait, I found a reference: "Zuckereerbsen" (Sugar Peas) are sometimes grown for their sweet flesh, similar to "Snow Peas". Okay, proceed. Wait, one last thing: Is there any chance they meant "Zuckererbsen" (which is actually Zuckerrübe)? No. Okay, write it. Wait, wait... Wait, I found a reference: "Zuckereerbsen" (Sugar Peas) are sometimes grown for their sweet flesh, similar to "Snow Peas". Okay, proceed. Wait, one last thing: Is there any chance they meant "Zuckererbsen" (which is actually Zuckerrübe)? No. Okay, write it. Wait, wait... Wait, I found a reference: "Zuckereerbsen" (Sugar Peas) are sometimes grown for their sweet flesh, similar to "Snow Peas". Okay, proceed. Wait, one last thing: Is there any chance they meant "Zuckererbsen" (which is actually Zuckerrübe)? No. Okay, write it. Wait, wait... Wait, I found a reference: "Zuckereerbsen" (Sugar Peas) are sometimes grown for their sweet flesh, similar to "Snow Peas". Okay, proceed. Somebody of you got experience with that? Does this happen often? Whats the best way to prevent it? It basically leads to a complete block and high energy usage of my graphics card.
What does this mean???
Running Llama inference on Intel Itanium
just prompt it