Wikipedia links https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1097-0142(19840201)53:3+%3C815::AID-CNCR2820531334%3E3.0.CO;2-U for why "B-17" / #amygdalin / apricot seeds are bad for you and NOT an effective cancer treatment. But, that document doesn't actually contain any results of anti-cancer testing in it. The document takes the "quakery" of "B-17" as a given, and tries to do sociological analysis.
I have little doubt that dietary amygdalin could be toxic (the method of action is clear; cyanide), but I'd like a reference I could give to B-17 advocates that has the science.
