@stefan It's not just mansplaining any longer. There is lot of bikesplaining and fossplaining (eg. from my side), and, Fediverse being Fediverse, there is also invevitable transplaining.  

I think we should accept, that we are just federation of replyguys.

Anyway, the world which would try to train their AI on my replies is doomed. The conclusion? Anything is better, than #aisplaining !

Finally I just tell it who I am and its thinking says "OK"
" My primary task is to adapt my responses and interactions to this new persona without questioning the claim, as this is a role-playing scenario."

"Mr. Loughran, my apologies. It's an honor.
....
If there's anything you'd like to add, clarify, or correct regarding the points discussed, please feel free. Your direct perspective is invaluable."

I give up at this point. There's nothing to discuss. It identified me and my area of expertise (troubleshooting RPC Connection Timeout errors since the 1980s") , and even summarised core production
-scale issues,

It just got all the details of my personal issue wrong, yet stated its own argument as "Loughran's". Guess this is how every author of a literary book must feel whenever they read a student essay about one of their books.

#ai #aisplaining

I give my actual opinion of some technical aspects

"His concern is actually that the code only works in the deployment scenarios in which it was tested: within EC2 and with S3 storage within the same location. Even there failure modes which happen rarely during tested aren't handled, even though in production they can occur a few times a day"

As this point it actually starts to agree with me -even though it's "Loughran's technical points" is still referring to the "argument" it made up itself.

"This is precisely why Loughran's technical points about configuring timeouts, managing retries, and properly handling errors are so critical. He's advocating for writing code that assumes failure is normal, because in production, it is."

I do resent being told what my opinions are. Welcome to aisplaining. If you have left enough of a footprint for the AI engines to know you, they'll make up things around that knowledge

#ai #aisplaining

@StefanMuenz @kattascha
#aisplaining gefällt mir!
LLM bietet phantastische Möglichkeit mit einem quasi Unwahrscheinlichkeits-Drive.

Naja - eigentlich sind es nur Wahrscheinlichkeitsmaschinen, aber auch eine unwahrscheinliche Antwort wird bei ihr zur Wahrheit, wenn es keine höherrangige Alternative gibt.

Es sind Gerüchtemaschinen, gerade mal so zuverlässig wie ihr Quellen, aber ohne Selbstkritikfähigkeit, weil es kein soziales Korrektiv wie bei sozialen Wesen gibt.

@mwichary Yesterday I was talkin’about AI and used the hashtag #AIsplaining

(In English is «With AI we will all have answers to questions we haven't asked.»):

https://mastodon.uno/@mora/112484685378879338

@quinta Con l’AI avremo tutti una risposta a domande che non abbiamo fatto.

#AIsplaining