_Ethical responsibility_
Incest is settled by a perverse disconnect between words and deeds.
According to Cécile Cée, ‘the situation does not depend on what the victim has to say about it, but on what society should say about it’ (p. 181). Once the act of naming is not:
* the result of interpersonal negotiation (to what extent may I call incest what the victim does not designate as such?),
* but rather a collective statement (‘It is up to society, to third parties, to you, to enunciate,’ p. 182), which alone can ‘put the world back the right way up’ (p. 227),
* then we move away from individual conscience and into the realm of social and political ethical responsibility.
#community #relationships #ethology #anthropology #family #domesticViolence #parenthood #denial #incest #incestCulture #patriarchy #publicHealth #mentalHealth #acquaintance #taboo #attachment #invisibility #kinship #incest #ethics #responsiblity #involvement #CélineCée #book
‘Each person is […] bound by different moral commitments towards the aggressor – depending on the position held and the relationship with one or the other’.
‘In the extended family, friendship and professional circles within which incest is reported, some, now adults, have obviously themselves been victims of abuse, others have been or still are abusers. In the vast majority of cases, these incestuous acts, whether suffered or imposed, have not been reported to the courts or made public. These incestuous acts are also known to others, who talk about them, have talked about them or will talk about them in the future. Circles of acquaintance and gossip intersect.’
Léonore Le Caisne (fr) https://blogs.mediapart.fr/leonore-le-caisne/blog/130121/qu-est-ce-que-le-silence-de-l-inceste
#ethology #anthropology #LeCaisne #family #domesticViolence #parenthood #denial #incest #incestCulture #patriarchy #publicHealth #mentalHealth #domesticViolence #aggressions #acquaintance #taboo #community #attachment #fawning #silentiation #silentiate #invisibility #kinship
L’inceste serait un « tabou », un acte interdit qui toucherait au sacré ou à l’impur et dont la transgression, rare, serait tenue secrète, au risque de polluer la société. Mais qu’est-ce qu’avoir « su » mais pas « dit » ? Qu’est-ce, en fait, qu’avoir « dit » ? Quelle parole, adressée à qui et à quel moment, est dotée du pouvoir de « dire » ce qui s’est passé ?