New #USlaws requiring #ageverification for online content access are impacting adult users, leading to #privacy concerns and potential #workarounds. While intended to protect minors, these laws often involve third-party vendors processing sensitive identity data, raising security risks and questions about data retention. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/08/social-media-child-safety-internet-ai-surveillance.html?eicker.media #media #socialmedia

UCMJ Article 92 & The Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders – 2025

Editor’s Note: This text (edited) was created by Gemini, November 20, 2025. The image is provided as CC0 1.0 public domain for use by anyone as needed.

The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) does not explicitly have a section titled “constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders,” but its provisions clearly establish that military personnel are required to obey only lawful orders. Illegal orders—those that violate the Constitution, U.S. laws, or international laws—do not require compliance and must be disobeyed.

Relevant UCMJ Articles and Provisions
Article 92 (10 U.S.C. § 892) – Failure to Obey an Order or Regulation

This article makes it a punishable offense to disobey lawful orders or regulations. It applies only to lawful orders, implying that unlawful orders are not to be obeyed. Orders are presumed lawful unless they clearly violate laws or constitutional rights.

This article also emphasizes the obedience of lawful orders, with punishment for willful disobedience. It implicitly excludes unlawful orders from what must be obeyed.

Legal experts interpret this as underscoring that orders lacking valid military purpose or that violate the Constitution are illegal and must not be followed.

Legal and Constitutional Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders

Military personnel swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, placing constitutional duty above obedience to unlawful commands. They are legally and morally obligated to refuse orders that require criminal acts, torture, harming civilians, or violate treaties such as the Geneva Conventions.

The law and military legal commentary affirm that obeying illegal orders is not a defense for committing illegal acts (the “Nuremberg defense” is invalid). Service members have a responsibility to seek clarification, document, report, and refuse unlawful commands.

Illegal orders include any commands that contradict the Constitution, U.S. laws, lawful superior orders, or fall beyond the issuing official’s authority. The legality of an order can ultimately be decided by a military judge.

Summary

The UCMJ Article 92 governs obedience, but its text and interpretation make clear only lawful orders must be obeyed.

The constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders arises from the oath to defend the Constitution and the principle that illegal orders are void.

Military law supports refusal of orders that require crimes or violations of constitutional and international law, with protections for service members who do so lawfully.

This relationship is grounded in UCMJ Articles 90 and 92, intertwined with constitutional principles and military legal interpretations, providing a clear framework that service members must disobey illegal orders.

MLA Bibliography

#2025 #bibliography #constitutionalDuty #dutyToDisobeyIllegalOrders #gemini #geminiAi #googleGemini #internationalLaws #legalExperts #militaryJudges #mla #uSConstitution #uSLaws #ucmj #ucmjArticle90 #ucmjArticle92 #uniformCodeOfMilitaryJustice

U.S. Laws That Will Blow Your Mind 🤯 Crazy Laws That Still Exist 🇺🇸

https://tube.blueben.net/w/sBsw1fQtSnFjzTD519zKPx

U.S. Laws That Will Blow Your Mind 🤯 Crazy Laws That Still Exist 🇺🇸

PeerTube

« Every day I am reminded that tens of millions of my fellow Americans endorsed not just Trump but the idea that a president should be immune from all accountability for everything he does. It’s nihilistic and shallow to just throw up your hands and say “nothing matters.” But damn, some days it’s really hard not to think that. » #Trump #USPolitics FelonTrump #Felony #USLaws

https://digbysblog.net/2025/01/10/one-man-is-above-the-law/

One Man Is Above The Law - Digby's Hullabaloo

A meaningless sentence empowering him further It's done: The historic New York criminal case against Donald Trump — the first of its kind against a former president — closed with a whimper Friday morning, with the president-elect facing no consequences for faking business documents to cover up a sexual affair from American voters in 2016. “Never before has this court…

Digby's Hullabaloo

#US #USlaws #Guns
So the kid was tried as an adult and got life in prison. And manslaughter is when you do something so dumb or badly that you cause the death of others - but I assumed that was when there wasn't another level of moral/ethical autonomy in between?
Since the son is an adult - he is the morally culpable. And if he's not, he wouldn't have been tried as an adult surely?

Is what I thought wrongly obv but how?

Article: DeSantis Crony Overseeing Disney Tax District Serving Illegally Because OF COURSE!

#desantis #florida #disneyworld #govdesantis #uslaws #uspolitics

https://flip.it/yOpl1z

DeSantis Crony Overseeing Disney Tax District Serving Illegally Because OF COURSE!

Ethics panel concludes DeSantis ally broke state law in accepting seat in Reedy Creek board takeover.

Above the Law
🌎 Did you know? In the U.S., only specific counties allow legal prostitution and have active brothels. 🏠 Curious which ones? You won't see the U.S. the same way again.
#GeographyMatters #MapInsights #USLaws #DidYouKnow

Article: Texas Judge Cosplaying as Medical Expert Has Consequences Beyond the Abortion Pill

#uspolitics #abortionpill #conservatives #Justice #uslegal #uslaws #medication #healthcare

https://flip.it/9TE9iP

Texas Judge Cosplaying as Medical Expert Has Consequences Beyond the Abortion Pill

The FDA has the power to ignore the mifepristone ruling, legal experts say. But only the courts can cure its dangerous implications.

The Intercept
The U.S. Supreme Court’s Latest Order Could Throw a Wrench in a Major Election Case

The Court’s order raises the possibility we won’t get a decision in Moore v. Harper at all.

Democracy Docket