Judge tosses Kilmar Abrego Garcia charges, calls Trump administration prosecution ‘vindictive’

https://lemmygrad.ml/post/11761165

Judge tosses Kilmar Abrego Garcia charges, calls Trump administration prosecution ‘vindictive’ - Lemmygrad

>Two court cases that never should have happened have nevertheless provided wins this week and blows to the current administration. > >Kilmar Abrego Garcia, whose story we have been tracking over the course of the last year, was acquitted of human smuggling charges by a federal judge in Tennessee. The judge said that the government’s case had a “retaliatory taint,” meaning (among other things) that it never should have been filed. > >Another clear case of vindictive prosecution is found in the case of the Broadview Six. These were non-violent protestors who ICE tear-gassed shot with pepper balls in Broadview, Illinois, near Chicago. [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/22/chicago-ice-protesters-charges-dropped-broadview-six] The six protestors who were charged included Kat Abughazaleh, a congressional candidate whose platform has always included the call to abolish ICE. The judge in this case dismissed the charges “with prejudice,” which means the government’s politicized prosecutors cannot appeal or re-file the charges. Those same prosecutors are now in the hot seat, accused of tampering with the grand jury convened for the case. (Taken from an email sent to me by Never Again Action.)

Federal Court Requires Trump Régime to Comply with Order Halting Unlawful Warrantless Immigration Arrest Policy in D.C.

https://lemmygrad.ml/post/11761164

Federal Court Requires Trump Régime to Comply with Order Halting Unlawful Warrantless Immigration Arrest Policy in D.C. - Lemmygrad

>The struggle between the lawless régime and the efforts of judges to require that the law be followed continues. As far back as December of last year, courts recognized that the régime’s practice of making Kavanaugh stops and arresting anyone with the wrong skin color was illegal. > >Unfortunately, a court ruling does not come with much in the way of enforcement powers. When the régime ignored Judge Beryl Howell’s ruling to cease arresting people simply because they suspected the person was Hispanic, the people went back to court. In February of this year they sued, getting an injunction ordering the immediate halt to arrests based on the racist standard set forth in a memorandum from Todd Lyons, former Acting Director of ICE. > >In the words of Shana Khader, deputy legal director for We Are CASA, “These rampant, unlawful warrantless arrests have terrorized our communities”. We hope that the courts continue to provide an important bulwark against such government-sponsored terror. (Taken from an email sent to me by Never Again Action.)

Did DHS just stop processing green cards? A closer look

https://lemmygrad.ml/post/11761109

Did DHS just stop processing green cards? A closer look - Lemmygrad

>In a memo that became public last week, DHS expresses their intention to transform the process of applying for a green card. Specifically, according to this memo, those intending to apply for legal permanent residency (aka a green card) may be forced to leave the country to do so. > >While this is just a memo, not a policy, it underscores the xenophobia at the heart of DHS. A white nationalist, immigrant-hating administration will continue to spread rumors, sow fear, and create obstacles for the collective health of immigrant communities. This memo expresses a desire to achieve that end by threatening to make it extremely difficult for those who enter the country with temporary visas to then apply for long-term residency. > >This comes as no surprise. ICE and DHS have always existed to scare people, touting a mythical “right way” to naturalize while changing the actual rules based on arbitrary, racist whims. > >It should be noted that so far, this is a memo. No new policy has yet been made. If you or someone you know is likely to be affected, it’s best to contact a trusted immigration lawyer. (Taken from an email sent to me by Never Again Action.)

Immigration activists whose homes were raided accuse federal agents of intimidation campaign

https://lemmygrad.ml/post/11761102

Immigration activists whose homes were raided accuse federal agents of intimidation campaign - Lemmygrad

>Federal agents in southern California have raided the homes of leaders of a volunteer-led immigrant advocacy group, VC Defensa. The activists allege that this is merely the latest escalation in an administration campaign of harassment and attempted intimidation. VC Defensa coordinates rapid response and ICE watch in the area. Federal agents raided at least three homes, but made no arrests. > >The group’s lawyer, Reem Yassin, said that over the past year federal officers have targeted more than 50 people associated with VC Defensa. These attempts at intimidation have come in the form of agents making arrests, raiding homes and businesses, ramming volunteers’ cars, pepper-spraying volunteers, and following them home. > >A March New York Times report uncovered a DHS taskforce investigating VC Defensa as part of a push to build cases accusing protesters of organizing radical leftist conspiracies. Across the country, hundreds of protesters have been arrested on charges of assaulting and impeding federal officers during immigration-enforcement operations. However, government prosecutors have struggled to secure convictions, with officers’ testimony frequently contradicted by bystander video. (Taken from an email sent to me by Never Again Action.)

Immigrants launch hunger strike at Adelanto detention center

https://lemmygrad.ml/post/11761050

Immigrants launch hunger strike at Adelanto detention center - Lemmygrad

>At least 20 people held at the Desert View Annex, an ICE processing center in Adelanto CA, have gone on hunger strike. The strikers are demanding access to better medical care, adequate meals, clean water, and clean and mold free facilities, among other demands. > >In a press conference held early on May 20th, family members of hunger strikers and advocates from local immigration organizations said the strikers were motivated by extreme medical neglect and lack of adequate, healthy meals. > >Private prison company GEO Group runs Desert View Annex. The company declined to comment on conditions at the facility. GEO Group referred comment to DHS, who flat out denied that people at Adelanto are on hunger strike. > >Action item: check out this toolkit for ways to support the Adelanto hunger strikers. [https://docs.google.com/document/d/17F8gWhCsqF6wN0VMMz17JpQdYf0wWze4vMne-i4cpvQ/edit?tab=t.0] (Taken from an email sent to me by Never Again Action. Emphasis original.)

Zionist group files cease and desist order against Park Slope Food Coop for boycotting apartheid

https://lemmygrad.ml/post/11751409

Zionist group files cease and desist order against Park Slope Food Coop for boycotting apartheid - Lemmygrad

>A group of pro-Israel activists has filed a cease and desist motion in response to a prominent Brooklyn grocery store’s decision to boycott Israeli products [https://www.jta.org/?p=1902133], the Jewish Telegraphic Agency has learned. > >The letter was sent to the manager and board of directors of the Park Slope Food Coop, alleging that the boycott approved in a vote on Tuesday night is illegal. > >The cease and desist letter was submitted by the National Jewish Advocacy Center, a legal and civil rights group, on behalf of Jewish member-owners of the coop. > >It alleges that the boycott came about “through a campaign of harassment, intimidation, deception, and slurs,” and that the board of the coop itself “used its authority to target, exclude, or economically disadvantage Jews and Israelis while exposing the cooperative to risk.” > >The letter further alleges that the boycott violates the basic principles of the coop’s autonomy by permitting the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement to gain a foothold through the PSFC Members for Palestine group. > >The Park Slope Food Coop did not return JTA’s request for comment. > >Thursday’s cease and desist is not the first legal action taken in the two days since the boycott passed. > >CUNY law professor Jeffrey Lax announced in a post on X Wednesday [https://nitter.poast.org/_SAFECAMPUS/status/2059698151313793207] he had filed a New York State Division of Human Rights complaint on behalf of his advocacy group, S.A.F.E. Campus. It alleges that the boycott violates a state law [https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/EXC/296#%3A%7E%3Atext=13.+It+shall%2Cnot+apply+to%3A] preventing the boycott or blacklist of products based on protected classes, including national origin. (The law does not apply to boycotts related to labor disputes or unlawful discriminatory practices.) > >This is a developing story

We need to add 6,000 seats to Congress. I'm serious. | Opinion

https://lemmy.org/post/6009442

We need to add 6,000 seats to Congress. I'm serious. | Opinion - Lemmy.org

Lemmy

Two polls find growing split among Republicans over support for an apartheid state

https://lemmygrad.ml/post/11697806

Two polls find growing split among Republicans over support for an apartheid state - Lemmygrad

>Two new polls of American voters have found declining public support for Israel and growing discontent among Republicans over President Donald Trump’s direction on Israel. > >According to a New York Times/Siena poll [https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/05/18/polls/times-siena-national-poll-crosstabs.html] published Monday, 38% of potential Republican voters said they would like to see the next Republican candidate for president move “in a new direction” on Israel, as opposed to following Trump’s lead. > >Nearly a third of potential Republican voters also said they believed Trump had been “too supportive of Israel,” according to the poll of 1,500 U.S. voters this month, which has a margin of error of 2.8 percentage points. > >The poll adds to growing signals that Israel is becoming a fault line within the Republican Party as well as on the left, where it has been increasingly divisive for years. In a sign of tensions surrounding the split by Republican leadership, Congress’ most anti-Israel Republican is facing a steep primary challenge from a Trump-backed Republican [https://www.jta.org/?p=1901807] on Tuesday. > >MAGA-aligned Republicans who support Trump in particular are more likely than other Trump voters to back the Israeli government, according to a different poll released last week by Politico [https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/16/poll-israel-aipac-gop-divides-trump-00919073]. > >The survey asked respondents who voted for Trump whether they identified with the president’s “Make America Great Again” movement. Just over half said they identified as MAGA. > >The Politico poll, which was conducted in partnership with Public First, an independent polling company headquartered in London, found that nearly half of MAGA Trump voters say they back Israel and approve of the actions of its current government, while just 29% of non-MAGA Trump voters say the same. > >The Politico poll found that 41% of MAGA Trump voters believe that Israel is justified in its military campaign in Gaza, compared to 31% of non-Maga Trump voters. The poll surveyed 2,035 U.S. adults online from April 11 to 14 and had an overall margin of sampling error of ±2.2 percentage points. > >Trump voters were also split over the perceived influence of the Israeli government over U.S. foreign policy, with 22% of MAGA voters saying they believed the Israeli government had too much influence, compared to 32% of non-MAGA voters. > >When asked about the spending of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the pro-Israel lobby, on U.S. elections, a topic that has increasingly split American Jews [https://www.jta.org/?p=1899868], 20% of MAGA Trump voters said they oppose the group’s “efforts to influence US elections,” compared to 31% of non-MAGA voters. AIPAC has increasingly emerged as a bogeyman in U.S. politics [https://www.jta.org/?p=1899274]. > >The New York Times/Siena poll [https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/05/18/polls/times-siena-national-poll-crosstabs.html] found Trump’s overall approval rating had sunk to 37%, with 64% of American voters saying they believed Trump made the wrong decision entering the Iran war. Among Republicans, support for Trump’s decision to enter the war was much higher, at 70%. > >The Times poll also also found that Americans are more likely to sympathize with Palestinians over Israelis, with 37% saying they sympathized more with Palestinians compared with 35% who say they sympathize more with Israelis. > >The finding is in line with a growing number since the beginning of the war with Gaza that have shown growing sympathy for Palestinians [https://www.jta.org/?p=1897493] among American voters. > >When asked whether the United States should provide additional economic and military support to Israel, 57% of American voters overall said they opposed doing so, compared with 37% who supported it.  Among Republicans, 66% said they supported additional support to Israel versus 30% who opposed.

Zionist infighting: hundreds call on apartheid ambassador to apologize for attack on J Street

https://lemmygrad.ml/post/11697767

Zionist infighting: hundreds call on apartheid ambassador to apologize for attack on J Street - Lemmygrad

>More than 500 rabbis, cantors and Jewish communal leaders have signed onto a letter calling on Israel’s ambassador to the United States, Yechiel Leiter, to rescind and apologize for remarks describing J Street as a “cancer within the Jewish community.” > >The letter [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h6sJpMNTazzQMd6x04l-E6hiRF5bzOE0hA9e93bL5ls/edit?tab=t.0], which J Street shared with the Jewish Telegraphic Agency on Thursday, accused Leiter, a Netanyahu appointee and former settler leader [https://www.jta.org/?p=1873794], of using language that “dehumanizes fellow Jews” during his remarks in Washington, D.C. [https://www.jta.org/?p=1901827], on Monday. > >J Street is the leading liberal pro-Israel lobby, and has increasingly staked out positions that have departed [https://www.jta.org/?p=1887329] from other mainstream pro-Israel groups. Last month, the group announced its opposition to continued U.S. military aid to Israel [https://www.jta.org/?p=1899806], which Leiter decried in his remarks. > >The signatories wrote that while Judaism embraces vigorous debate, disagreements must be conducted with “humanity, humility and respect for the dignity of every Jew.” > >“At this painful and polarized moment in Jewish life, leaders on both sides of the ocean bear a heightened responsibility to lower the flames rather than fan them further,” the letter read. “We therefore call on you to retract your remarks and issue a public apology to the many American Jews, rabbis, cantors and communal leaders who have been hurt by them.” > >Among the signatories were New York Rep. Jerrold Nadler, former U.S. ambassadors to Israel Daniel Kurtzer and Tom Nides, National Council of Jewish Women CEO Jody Rabhan, Union for Reform Judaism President Rabbi Rick Jacobs and Rabbi David Saperstein, the director emeritus of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism. > >J Street President Jeremy Ben-Ami told JTA that his initial reaction to Leiter’s comments was “simply dismay on behalf of Israel and on behalf of the Jewish community.” > >“It’s a shame, because Israel, right now, needs all the friends it can get, and it really needs diplomats who seek to open doors and not slam them in people’s faces,” Ben-Ami said. > >The Israeli Embassy did not immediately respond to a request for comment from JTA. > >The comments from Leiter follow a long history of criticism [https://www.jta.org/?p=1837009] of the lobby from pro-Israel officials. In 2017, former U.S. ambassador to Israel David Friedman called the group “worse than kapos,” [https://www.jta.org/?p=1329504] a reference to Jews who aided the [Axis]. > >While Ben-Ami said that the latest attack was “not new,” he felt spurred to craft a communal rebuke of Leiter’s rhetoric because he felt it was “breaking” not just the U.S.–Israel relationship, but the relationship between the “American Jewish community and the Israeli Jewish community.” > >“Within 24 hours we had hundreds and hundreds of people, and I think it just shows what a raw nerve Ambassador Leiter has touched here, and just what a big mistake it is for the Israeli government to write off the majority of Jewish Americans who are deeply critical of the government but supportive of the state and the people,” Ben-Ami said of the number of signatories. > >While Ben-Ami said that J Street had long been invited to meet with former Israeli ambassadors, he claimed that since Leiter arrived, the group had been “blacklisted by the Embassy, and there’s been no engagement whatsoever.” > >The letter comes as J Street has also faced scrutiny from across the political aisle, with the Zionist Organization of America calling for Hillels, Jewish Community Relations Councils and federations to cease relations with the group [https://zoa.org/?p=454867], while the student government of Sarah Lawrence College rejected an application to form a chapter of the group on its campus [https://www.jta.org/?p=1901446]. > >“There’s going to be people to our left who are intolerant and you know engage in similar tactics to folks on the right who are intolerant and try to shut out those they disagree with, and that is just as disturbing,” Ben-Ami said. > >Looking ahead, Ben-Ami said that he hoped the letter would serve as a reminder that Jewish leaders need to make room for ideological differences rather than treat dissent as disloyalty. > >“The message more broadly here is, we need to embrace the diversity of opinion,” Ben-Ami said. “We need to embrace our disagreements and recognize that that is indeed part of Jewish tradition.”

Stephen Miller Lied About Immigrant Jobs Going to American Workers

https://lemmygrad.ml/post/11688140

Stephen Miller Lied About Immigrant Jobs Going to American Workers - Lemmygrad

>How do we know he’s lying? His lips are moving. An evergreen bit of snark that is especially applicable to the régime’s chief architect of the war on immigrants. The National Bureau of Economic Research has done the first study to determine the effects of taking out such a large chunk of the workforce. > >As we would expect, the fields of agriculture, construction, and manufacturing, those hardest hit by the deportation machine, showed no job gains for U.S.-born workers. In fact, the lack of improved opportunities stretches across the entire country, including industries that have lost the laborers who propped them up by taking low-wage, high-effort jobs. The data verifies what we already knew: that Stephen Miller and the régime have been exploiting the economic situation to scapegoat and vilify immigrants. (Taken from an email sent to me by Never Again Action.)