Automate your research impact with The Lens + ORCID 🛠️
Stop wasting time on manual data entry! Our next "Enabling Value" webinar features The Lens to show how their open tools allow for "set-and-forget" ORCID record maintenance.
Join us on 19 March to learn how to keep your profile current with zero ongoing effort.
🔗 Register here: https://orcid-org.zoom.us/webinar/register/4217703043770/WN_coU_D57bRFOAIUvxqv68WA
Is your patent data missing from your ORCID record? 💡📑
Most tools track journal articles, but patents often fall through the cracks. Join us on 19 March to see how #TheLens integrates patent data from 100+ jurisdictions directly into #ORCID.
Ensure your full portfolio of innovation—from papers to patents—is visible to funders and peers.
🔗 Secure your spot: https://orcid-org.zoom.us/webinar/register/4217703043770/WN_coU_D57bRFOAIUvxqv68WA
Automate your research impact with The Lens + ORCID 🛠️
Stop wasting time on manual data entry! Our next "Enabling Value" webinar features The Lens to show how their open tools allow for "set-and-forget" ORCID record maintenance.
Join us on 19 March to learn how to keep your profile current with zero ongoing effort.
🔗 Register here: https://orcid-org.zoom.us/webinar/register/4217703043770/WN_coU_D57bRFOAIUvxqv68WA
Is your patent data missing from your ORCID record? 💡📑
Most tools track journal articles, but patents often fall through the cracks. Join us on 19 March to see how #TheLens integrates patent data from 100+ jurisdictions directly into #ORCID.
Ensure your full portfolio of innovation—from papers to patents—is visible to funders and peers.
🔗 Secure your spot: https://orcid-org.zoom.us/webinar/register/4217703043770/WN_coU_D57bRFOAIUvxqv68WA
#ORCID#OpenScience #ResearchAdmin #Automation
Automate your research impact with The Lens + ORCID 🛠️
Stop wasting time on manual data entry! Our next "Enabling Value" webinar features The Lens to show how their open tools allow for "set-and-forget" ORCID record maintenance.
Join us on 19 March to learn how to keep your profile current with zero ongoing effort.
🔗 Register here: https://orcid-org.zoom.us/webinar/register/4217703043770/WN_coU_D57bRFOAIUvxqv68WA
The Lens search engine has some new search features available under the menu option "New Structure Search" such as:
Retracted
Cited by Patents
Has Clinical Trial
Has chemical
Under "Query Tools" you can check an
option that your query has a regular expression.
The is also a Query Text Editor shown in the large rectangle in the lower middle of the 2nd image that allows you to interactively edit and validate Boolean queries.
Open Science Alternatives to Scopus and the Web of Science: A Case Study in Regional Resilience
#AMiner #Dimensions #IrinaDTurgel #OlgaAChernova #OpenScience #OpenAlex #ScientificCommunication #Scientometrics #Scopus #TheLens #WebOfScience #Wizdomai
New study: "Non-selective databases (#Dimensions, #OpenAlex, #Scilit, and #TheLens) index a greater amount of retracted literature than do databases that rely their indexation on venue selection (#PubMed, #Scopus, and #WoS)…The high coverage of OpenAlex and Scilit could be explained by the inaccurate labeling of retracted documents in #Scopus, Dimensions, and The Lens."
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-024-05034-y
In this study, the coverage and overlap of retracted publications, retraction notices and withdrawals are compared across seven significant scholarly databases, with the aim to check for discrepancies, pinpoint the causes of those discrepancies, and choose the best product to produce the most accurate picture of retracted literature. Seven scholarly databases were searched to obtain all the retracted publications, retraction notices and withdrawal from 2000. Only web search interfaces were used, excepting in OpenAlex and Scilit. The findings demonstrate that non-selective databases (Dimensions, OpenAlex, Scilit, and The Lens) index a greater amount of retracted literature than do databases that rely their indexation on venue selection (PubMed, Scopus, and WoS). The key factors explaining these discrepancies are the indexation of withdrawals and proceeding articles. Additionally, the high coverage of OpenAlex and Scilit could be explained by the inaccurate labeling of retracted documents in Scopus, Dimensions, and The Lens. 99% of the sample is jointly covered by OpenAlex, Scilit and WoS. The study suggests that research on retracted literature would require querying more than one source and that it should be advisable to accurately identify and label this literature in academic databases.
ORCID Organization
MottG
Infodoc MicroVeille
petersuber
Tim Ruppert