How tax burdens compare across wealthy countries and what it means for middle-class workers
📰 Original title: How big would your tax burden be in another rich country?
🤖 IA: It's not clickbait ✅
👥 Users: It's not clickbait ✅

How tax burdens compare across wealthy countries and what it means for middle-class workers
This opinion piece from the Washington Post Editorial Board examines how tax burdens vary across wealthy countries, focusing on comparisons between the United States and other members of the OECD. It explains the concept of the “tax wedge,” which includes income taxes and social security contributions paid by both employees and employers. Using an example of a U.S. worker earning around $79,000 in total labor costs, the article shows how roughly 30 percent of compensation is absorbed by taxes and payroll contributions before reaching take-home pay. The piece argues that while many Americans look to European countries for inspiration in building stronger welfare systems, those systems are often financed not primarily by taxing the rich but by broad-based taxes on middle-income workers. It notes that average tax rates across OECD countries have risen for multiple consecutive years, reaching a decade high of 35.1 percent in 2025. In many cases, governments are increasing revenue through higher income taxes or by failing to adjust tax brackets for inflation, which effectively pushes more workers into higher tax brackets. The article also highlights differences within countries, noting that families with children often receive varying levels of tax relief, and that single parents in the U.S. can face particularly steep marginal losses on additional earnings due to taxes and benefit phaseouts. Despite relatively low tax rates compared to Europe, the U.S. maintains high levels of spending on pensions and healthcare, resulting in large federal deficits and a national debt exceeding $39 trillion. Ultimately, the editorial warns that the U.S. model relies heavily on borrowing, which may not be sustainable long-term. It suggests that while economic growth and lower taxes can support higher incomes, rising fiscal pressures in advanced economies show the trade-offs involved in expanding welfare states without corresponding tax increases.


