Show threadSteven SandovalMar 19, 2025

This was a stray thought I had while reading How a Realist Hero Rebuilt the Kingdom when the MC is asked by a world superpower if he wants an invading country's leader's head as compensation. MC, who was an aspiring Japanese civil servant before being summoned to sword and fantasy world, insisted on monetary damages. #GenKoku https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_a_Realist_Hero_Rebuilt_the_Kingdom

The situation triggered some #OpeningArguments memories in which specific performance and monetary damages came up during #T3BE bar exam questions.

How a Realist Hero Rebuilt the Kingdom - Wikipedia

Steven SandovalDec 29, 2024
I updated my #OpeningArguments episode list. https://reboil.com/mediawiki/List_of_Opening_Arguments_episodes #T3BE #OpenArgs #law #podcast
List of Opening Arguments episodes - Reboil

Will LaFranceJan 6, 2023
#OpeningArguments #T3BE 310 - It's B or C. The question is testing strict or intermediate scrutiny, and since it's like a content-neutral restriction on speech I think it's intermediate scrutiny. Final answer, C: it is not unconstitutional if it relates to job performance. Second chance, if job performance in the public sector is not an "important governmental interest" then it's strict scrutiny, B. https://openargs.com/
Opening Arguments

The legal podcast that helps you make sense of the news.

Opening Arguments
Will LaFranceDec 25, 2022
#OpeningArguments #T3BE The answer is A. Party B had no violation, we're under common law, and conversion requires intent. https://openargs.com/oa667-the-referrals-have-been-made-now-what-will-it-take-to-convict/
OA667: The Referrals Have Been Made. Now What Will It Take To Convict?

Andrew gives us that signature OA approach, having read every case relevant to the law Trump has potentially violated. What does the case law tell us about how to convict him? For full links and de…

Opening Arguments
The Dinosaur DaveNov 19, 2022
Anyone out there looking for a good legal podcast, focusing on breaking down the law in ways nonlawyers can understand. Check out #OpeningArguments. It's really really good at making legal nonsense make sense
Oh, #T3be - A) because I figure the first guess on here should probably be from a non lawyer with no actual answer.
Anyway enjoy the show.
https://openargs.com/oa649-respect-for-marriage-act-advances-in-the-senate/
OA649: Respect for Marriage Act Advances in the Senate!

…despite Mitch McConnell voting against codifying his own marriage into law… This is good news! Is it perfect news? As usual, no! But is it still very good? Yes! Would this have happene…

Opening Arguments