There Will Be a Scientific Theory of Deep Learning

In this paper, we make the case that a scientific theory of deep learning is emerging. By this we mean a theory which characterizes important properties and statistics of the training process, hidden representations, final weights, and performance of neural networks. We pull together major strands of ongoing research in deep learning theory and identify five growing bodies of work that point toward such a theory: (a) solvable idealized settings that provide intuition for learning dynamics in realistic systems; (b) tractable limits that reveal insights into fundamental learning phenomena; (c) simple mathematical laws that capture important macroscopic observables; (d) theories of hyperparameters that disentangle them from the rest of the training process, leaving simpler systems behind; and (e) universal behaviors shared across systems and settings which clarify which phenomena call for explanation. Taken together, these bodies of work share certain broad traits: they are concerned with the dynamics of the training process; they primarily seek to describe coarse aggregate statistics; and they emphasize falsifiable quantitative predictions. We argue that the emerging theory is best thought of as a mechanics of the learning process, and suggest the name learning mechanics. We discuss the relationship between this mechanics perspective and other approaches for building a theory of deep learning, including the statistical and information-theoretic perspectives. In particular, we anticipate a symbiotic relationship between learning mechanics and mechanistic interpretability. We also review and address common arguments that fundamental theory will not be possible or is not important. We conclude with a portrait of important open directions in learning mechanics and advice for beginners. We host further introductory materials, perspectives, and open questions at learningmechanics.pub.

Scientific Theory But Funny

Science can be very serious… but some scientific theories and laws are unintentionally (or intentionally) funny. Here are some real, famous...

Dirk Boucsein (@philosophies-de.bsky.social)

#Zoomposium with #Brigitte #Falkenburg #Myth #Determinism or the #Limits of #BrainResearch #NaturalPhilosophy #ScientificTheory #Philosophy #Physics #Modern #Metaphysics #Epistemology #Technology #Bieri #Qualia More at: https://philosophies.de/index.php/2025/02/19/mythos-determinismus/ or: youtu.be/P3Vf64QFg0U

Why do philosophy of physics when you can do physics itself? | Aeon Essays

Some physicists reject philosophy as a distraction from ‘real’ science but it is in fact both useful and beautiful

Crazy People Who Were Proven Right

Boost your efficiency now, thanks to ‪@Odoo by using my link: https://www.odoo.com/r/zv6eJoin my Discord to discuss this video:https://discord.gg/yj7KAs33hw...

Bluesky