#salami bubble has to go
n o w
looks like the hype is ready to go #salami
bubble starts to collapse
unfortunately humans get fired in the thousands, instead of the fools at the top
@fabricepigeard đ¤¨
haven't they added so called AI ? đ¤
#salami and #privacy don't go well together
I've moved away last year after many years using #firefox
works are important
it's #salami
nothing intelligent inside stochastic parrots - nothing at all
The Conversation: Woolworthsâ AI agent rambled about its âmotherâ. Itâs a sign of deeper problems with the tech rollout https://theconversation.com/woolworths-ai-agent-rambled-about-its-mother-its-a-sign-of-deeper-problems-with-the-tech-rollout-277072
@Tiberio #WalterQuattrociocchi però non è un giornalista del Corriere, ed è capace di prendere posizioni che un professore di informatica può pagare in termini di mancati finanziamenti: https://nostrascuola.blog/2025/08/26/intelligenza-artificiale-chatgpt-e-large-language-model-alcuni-chiarimenti-fondamentali
Su nostrascuola.blog ci sono altri sui interventi sul perchĂŠ è fuorviante e pericoloso far passare (a scuola e non solo) i #SALAMI per #Ă
I.
Credo che il punto sia che i media sociali proprietari sono editorialmente organizzati come mezzi di (in)trattenimento, per trattenere gli usati e vendere sistemi di modifica comportamentale basati sui loro dati . Questa politica editoriale li rende luoghi ostili a una seria discussione scientifica - come mostrano le stesse disastrose conseguenze della scelta di valutare la ricerca bibliometricamente, vale a dire con algoritmi basati sulla popolaritĂ alla maniera di Facebook :->
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/feb/03/the-situation-has-become-appalling-fake-scientific-papers-push-research-credibility-to-crisis-point

di Walter Quattrociocchi Riportiamo qui alcune importantissime considerazioni di Walter Quattrociocchi, Professore Ordinario di Informatica presso lâUniversitĂ di Roma La Sapienza, dove dirigâŚ
#AaronSwartz was treated like a criminal. #AI (#SALAMI) companies that do the same are not, even if their main interests are money and surveillance, not science.
This is a blatant demonstration that the purpose of #copyright today is n ot to defend authors, but rather to defend corporate monopolies.
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2026/01/ai-and-the-corporate-capture-of-knowledge.html
Authors and readers share an interest: defending the freedom of data they only can interpret to build knowledge!
More than a decade after Aaron Swartzâs death, the United States is still living inside the contradiction that destroyed him. Swartz believed that knowledge, especially publicly funded knowledge, should be freely accessible. Acting on that, he downloaded thousands of academic articles from the JSTOR archive with the intention of making them publicly available. For this, the federal government charged him with a felony and threatened decades in prison. After two years of prosecutorial pressure, Swartz died by suicide on Jan. 11, 2013. The still-unresolved questions raised by his case have resurfaced in todayâs debates over artificial intelligence, copyright and the ultimate control of knowledge...