IRGC Creates Belt of Fire in “Tel Aviv”

Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) announced the continuation of wave 89 of Operation True Promise 4 under the call of “Ya Haidar Karrar,” dedicating the launch to its martyred navy chief, Admiral Alireza Tangsiri. A statement by the IRGC’s Public Relations revealed that a combination of heavy and precise missiles, namely Qiam, Emad, and the multi-warhead Qadr, were deployed in the operation.

According to the statement, the missile strikes created a belt of fire, stretching from Ramat Gan to Holon, Palmachim, and Bnei Brak, east of Tel Aviv. Zionist media had reported extensive damage in the named areas, as well as confirmed casualties.

The Iranian operation had imposed a state of heightened alert among illegal settlers, as they prepare for further escalation. Significant disruption was reported, while millions of settlers rushed to seek shelter, causing widespread chaos and major street congestion. At the same time, efforts to enter shelters lasted for extended periods, especially in the lead-up to the Jewish Passover holiday.

At the same time, missile and drone operations continue pounding targets spanning from the occupied north to the occupied south, while a substanial portion of the IRGC’s military capabilities remains undeployed and will be progressively activated in the upcoming days.

Iran’s ‘largest missile wave’ leaves ‘Tel Aviv’ extensively damaged

Earlier today, zionist media reported that Iran’s latest missile wave, consisting of at least 10 ballistic missiles, launched toward Tel Aviv was among the largest in recent weeks. The wave came as launches from Iran and Hezbollah in Lebanon continue with rising intensity.

The strikes reportedly made a direct impact and resulted in confirmed casualties, including the collapse of a building in Petah Tikva, while several vehicles were set ablaze. More impacts were reported in Ramat Gan and Holon. Moreover, extensive damage was reported in Rosh Haayin, where Iranian missiles struck.

As sirens blared across Tel Aviv, live broadcasts were interrupted, with reporters in the i24 studio having to cut off the broadcast to seek shelter. Coverage was shifted to an external correspondent. Meanwhile, with sirens still blasting, zionist emergency services reported difficulty in operations.

Over two million settlers fled to shelters, while military analysts admitted that zionist air defense systems faced an unprecedented challenge posed by the Iranian missiles.

Additionally, Channel 14 cited military experts as saying the missile barrage was the “most significant” since week two of the war, emphasizing that it was accompanied by a surge in missile launches targeting the occupied north from southern Lebanon, further exacerbating the security challenge.

IRGC launches waves of strikes

The Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) announced on Wednesday the execution of a wide-scale, coordinated military operation involving ballistic missiles, drones, and rocket artillery strikes targeting US and Israeli installations, including positions associated with the US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain, as well as an aircraft carrier and a tanker across West Asia.

In a statement, the IRGC said the strikes were carried out as part of the second round of the 89th wave of Operation True Promise 4, in coordination with allied Resistance forces across the region.

The group reported that several senior US naval officers were evacuated to hospitals in Manama following the strikes.

The IRGC also said it conducted multiple simultaneous operations, dedicated to recently killed commanders, including senior figures identified as Navy chief Admiral Alireza Tangsiri and Major General Jamshid Eshaqi.

Among its assertions, the group said it struck US early-warning radar systems deployed at naval facilities in regional waters and on islands in the United Arab Emirates. It further claimed responsibility for an attack on an Israeli-affiliated oil tanker operating under the commercial name Eco 1 in the central Gulf, saying the vessel was set ablaze.

The statement also said drones were launched towards a US aircraft carrier, the Abraham Lincoln, in the northern Indian Ocean, forcing it to withdraw further into open waters.

The IRGC said the operations were carried out under a code phrase invoking religious symbolism and involved “five large-scale operations” as part of the wider campaign.

Wave 89: IRGC strikes US military hideouts in honor of Yemeni martyrs

In a separate statement, the Islamic Republic of Iran Army (Artesh), announced earlier that it had carried out drone strikes targeting key US military assets and facilities across the region.

In a statement, the IRGC said the strikes were carried out as part of the 89th wave of Operation True Promise 4, in coordination with allied Resistance forces across the region.

Multi-axis strikes across occupied territories by IRGC, allies

According to the statement, the operation involved the launching of more than 100 heavy missiles and one-way attack drones, and 200 rocket-artillery rounds, targeting sites in the region. The strikes reportedly extended from northern to southern areas of the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories.

The IRGC said the attacks targeted military positions and groupings of zionist occupation forces in several key areas, including Eilat, Tel Aviv, and Bnei Brak. It added that the operation was carried out in dedication to the martyrs of the Islamic Resistance in Yemen.

The strikes resulted in significant casualties and damage in the occupied territories and in the region.

Strikes expand to US positions in the region

The statement further reported, in a subsequent phase, that a US military site in Bahrain was targeted with precision strikes, hitting a hideout location housing around 80 military personnel.

Recent social media footage reportedly shows damage to Batelco infrastructure, a key host for major cloud providers like Amazon Web Services. A separate video appears to show US service members taking cover in a bunker during a missile strike on their base.

Additionally, the IRGC said that a US military helicopter unit stationed at Al-Udeid Airbase, in Qatar, was struck by ballistic missiles, resulting in the destruction of one helicopter and damage to others.

The IRGC emphasized that the operation reflects increasing coordination between Iran’s Armed Forces and Resistance factions across the region, describing it as a manifestation of unity within the Islamic world against “oppressive enemies”.

It also pointed to internal cohesion within Iran, emphasizing that both developments are key outcomes of the ongoing confrontation.

Broader impacts of the confrontation

The statement further stressed that the escalation has contributed to mounting pressure on the zionist  regime, including deteriorating living conditions in the occupied territories ahead of the holiday season. It also underscored wider consequences affecting the United States, including disruptions to services, troop withdrawals from the region, and broader economic strain globally.

The IRGC concluded by stating that the current wave of operations would continue “with full intensity,” adding that further updates would be announced in due course.

Iranian Army targets US aerial assets, regional bases

In its 51st communique, the Artesh said its forces targeted the “deployment locations of US AWACS and refueling aircraft” stationed at Ben Gurion Airport, along with radar systems for detecting and tracking missiles and combat drones, as well as electronic warfare sites designed to counter drone operations in the United Arab Emirates.

The statement added that the Iranian Army had previously conducted drone strikes against US bases in regional countries and military sites in the occupied Palestinian territories, resulting in significant damage and disruptions to aerial combat support operations, including aircraft missions and missile and drone interception systems.

According to the statement, the latest wave of attacks utilized Arash-2 long-range heavy one-way attack drones, with an operational endurance of up to 2,000 kilometers.

The Artesh emphasized that its forces remain committed to continuing operations in response to attacks on Iran, particularly those targeting civilian areas, and reaffirmed their determination to pursue retaliation.

Iran to escalate missile strikes

An Iranian political-security official  confirmed that Iran will gradually increase its missile launches in the coming period. The official also emphasized that this escalation will be matched by a significant increase in operations by the resistance axis, targeting enemy interests across the region.

The official further clarified that Iran’s strategic plan will leave no opportunity for the enemy, specifically focusing on the destruction of radar and defense infrastructures. This effort aims to undermine the enemy’s military capabilities and further strengthen Iran’s defense posture.

Highlighting Iran’s military strength, the official assured that the targeting of the enemy’s diverse military infrastructures will continue without interruption until deterrence is achieved. Iran’s missile arsenal, which he stressed was vast and advanced, will likely surprise adversaries, especially with the experience gained during the recent 12-day aggression.

In addition, the official pointed out that Iran possesses the necessary capabilities to defend itself and launch sustained strikes against its enemies for a prolonged period. The official also warned that any attempt to target Iranian infrastructure would result in severe and unexpected retaliation, emphasizing Iran’s firm commitment to responding forcefully and decisively.

Iran, according to the official, is determined to maintain the initiative in this ongoing situation, demonstrating resolve to respond without hesitation and exert pressure on its adversaries.

Joint airstrikes target zionist regime

The Yemeni Armed Forces (YAF) announced the launch of its third military operation targeting zionist- occupied territories, as part of an ongoing campaign in support of regional Resistance fronts.

In a statement, Brigadier General Yahya Saree said the YAF carried out the “third military operation” within the Sacred Jihad Battle, launching a salvo of ballistic missiles at “sensitive targets” in southern occupied Palestine.

The statement added that the operation was conducted “in continuation of supporting and backing the fronts of Resistance” and as part of a “religious, moral, and humanitarian duty” toward allied forces in Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, and Palestine.

Coordinated operation with regional allies

According to the statement, the strike was carried out in coordination with Iran and Hezbollah, emphasizing that the operation “successfully achieved its objectives.”

On Tuesday morning, at 6:25 am, the zionist military command said that it identified a missile attack from Yemen, as warning sirens sounded across southern occupied Palestine, extending from Dimona in the al-Naqab desert to coastal Askalan. Since early morning, multiple drone and rocket attacks have been launched from Lebanon, and a total of four waves of ballistic missile strikes from Iran.

The Yemeni Armed Forces warned that continued zionist escalation and attacks across the region, including in Lebanon, Iran, Iraq, and Palestine, would be met with further escalation.

They stated that such actions “will only push free Yemen toward further escalation,” indicating that operations would persist until aggression ceases and blockades are lifted.

Zionist injuries rise to 6,638 amid Iran, Hezbollah strikes

Earlier, the occupation’s Health Ministry announced that 118 injuries were admitted to hospitals on Tuesday, amid the ongoing regional escalation kick-started by the US and the Israeli regime.

According to the Ministry, the total number of injuries recorded in Israeli hospitals since the outset of US-zionist aggression on Iran, on February 28, has reached 6,638 cases as of midnight on March 31.

The Ministry also reported that the cumulative number of injuries admitted to Israeli hospitals since October 7, 2023, has risen to 82,956.

Inside South Lebanon: Hezbollah’s War of Attrition Reshapes the Battlefield

A month after the start of the Israeli offensive on Lebanon, fighting in southern Lebanon continues to intensify within a highly complex battlefield environment. As the operation enters its second month, a clear field dynamic is taking shape – one defined by a focused attrition strategy imposed by Hezbollah, which manages engagements in a way that steadily increases the cost for advancing Israeli forces.

The ongoing ground operations in southern Lebanon fall within an asymmetric confrontation between the Israeli enemy’s army – as a conventional military force with air and technological superiority – and a non-conventional resistance that does not operate according to traditional military doctrine. Hezbollah does not rely on fixed territorial control or linear defense lines; instead, it employs a guerrilla warfare model based on operational flexibility, dispersion, ambushes, and concentrated strikes within a cumulative attrition framework targeting the Israel’s manpower and logistical capabilities.

According to field sources, the enemy’s ground incursions are distributed across several main axes, each with its own geographic and tactical characteristics, as follows:

Khiam axis
Khiam is a vital axis for the Israeli enemy due to its connection to villages where the resistance has no presence, as well as its linkage to the western Bekaa and the occupied Syrian territories – making it a corridor between Lebanon and Syria.
Hezbollah’s tactic here is based on steadfastness and defense through establishing combat pockets within the town, supported by fire from the second line in surrounding villages. So far, the Israel has not been able to fully control Khiam; its presence is limited to parts of it, while Hezbollah remains present. This axis also carries a retaliatory dimension for Israel due to the losses it sustained in attempts to seize it during the 2006 and 2024 wars.

Taybeh–Qantara axis
Taybeh represents the operational flank. Israeli forces aim to reach Wadi al-Hujeir after controlling Qantara, then advance toward the Litani River.
Here, Hezbollah adopts a different tactic than in Khiam – offensive attrition aimed at inflicting the maximum possible human and logistical losses on the enemy. Israeli troops are currently present inside Taybeh and are attempting to consolidate their positions, while the resistance continues targeting soldiers, tanks, and vehicles.

As for Qantara, it remains a close-range engagement zone. Meanwhile, nearby villages (Odaisseh, Rab al-Thalatheen, Kfar Kila, and parts of Markaba) are used as part of a tactic targeting enemy depth. These areas were previously under Israeli control and sustained extensive damage during earlier conflicts, the 60-day withdrawal period following a so-called ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon in 2024, and over the past 15 months.

The key question here is not whether the enemy can reach Wadi al-Hujeir, but rather the operational cost it will incur in doing so – especially since the resistance is not a conventional army and has not defined holding these villages as a strategic objective.

Naqoura axis
The Naqoura axis is a border extension along the coastal strip facing the Blue Line near the Lebanese–Palestinian border. Israel seeks to establish a buffer zone, secure its land and maritime borders, and target Hezbollah’s missile capabilities.
The area is wooded, and villages are connected through orchards, providing effective natural cover for the resistance forces. Another objective is to isolate this axis from its depth in the Tyre (Sur) region and cut supply and reinforcement lines.

Bint Jbeil axis
Field data indicates that Israel has begun troop mobilization and fire preparation for entering Bint Jbeil, which represents a vulnerable flank due to nearby villages where the resistance has no presence. It also holds significant symbolic importance in Israeli consciousness since 2000, following the famous statement by the late Hezbollah secretary-general Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah: “Israel is weaker than a spider’s web.”
This symbolism makes the city both a practical and psychological target. The resistance’s tactic is centered on preventing the city from falling.

Qawzah Axis (Qawzah–Beit Lif–Ramiya Triangle)
The “Qawzah–Beit Lif–Ramiya” triangle forms a strategic border axis, with its villages located on medium elevations overlooking surrounding areas, making it highly sensitive to ground movement and exchanges of fire.
Israel seeks to establish a buffer zone to secure its land borders and degrade the resistance’s missile capabilities. The terrain consists of forests and orchards connected to the villages, providing natural concealment for Hezbollah forces. Meanwhile, adjacent villages lack a resistance presence, making this axis a vulnerable flank that can be exploited, while also restricting military movement due to internal considerations.

General field situation and tactics

After approximately a month since the start of operations, Israeli forces remain positioned within the first line (border villages and the direct line of contact), without achieving a decisive breakthrough into deeper areas due to the ongoing attrition imposed by Hezbollah.

In contrast, the resistance adopts a tactic of allowing limited advances in certain front lines, then exhausting enemy forces from the second line through continuous fire or direct engagement. Unofficial field estimates indicate that the Israeli army has suffered significant human losses, estimated in the hundreds of killed and wounded (possibly reaching around 700), in addition to the targeting of more than 100 Merkava tanks according to data from the Hezbollah’s military media, as well as a number of vehicles and bulldozers. This level of losses would have been sufficient, under previous circumstances, to halt operations.

Hezbollah is currently following a gradual approach in the use of weapons and combat units, while maintaining full command, control, and communication  – reflecting substantial remaining capabilities. The cohesion of the communication system among the central operations room, axis-level command rooms, and combat units is evident, as reflected in improved military and organizational performance and the rapid transmission of field information.

The resistance operates according to an anti-maneuver doctrine rooted in guerrilla warfare, benefiting from a cohesive command-and-control structure and sustained supply lines. In contrast, the enemy suffers from intelligence shortcomings that limit the effectiveness of its isolation-based strategies. Accordingly, the confrontation is taking shape as a struggle between a maneuver-based approach aimed at fragmenting the front  – led by the Israeli army  – and a systematic attrition strategy aimed at exhausting the attacking force and preventing its consolidation  – led by Hezbollah.

Meanwhile, the Israeli army relies on an operational approach based on maneuver through encirclement and isolation rather than direct assault, with the aim of reducing human losses and accelerating the achievement of a field accomplishment that can be exploited for media purposes. This is pursued through attempts to fragment the Hezbollah’s combat structure into isolated pockets and to cut supply lines between the first and second lines south of the Litani River.

The enemy’s strategic dilemma

Israel is fighting without a clear strategic vision, as its declared operations aim to secure northern occupied Palestine and establish a buffer zone for the same purpose. However, even reaching the Litani River does not guarantee the neutralization of Hezbollah’s missile capability, which continues to pose the same threat to the north.

The options available to the enemy include a full-scale invasion to militarily eliminate the resistance  – an option considered impossible under current conditions, given the deteriorated state of its army and its ongoing attrition. This reality was acknowledged by the Israeli Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir himself, who warned of the risk of the army’s collapse if confrontations continue in this manner.

The realistic option, therefore, is to move toward an agreement and indirect negotiations, or to achieve a limited field accomplishment by reaching Wadi al-Hujeir and taking photographs near the Litani River, accompanied by media momentum alongside a diplomatic track.

The media dimension is evident in the visit of Israeli Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir to Tel al-Awida in Kfar Kila and the visit of the army spokesperson to Odaisseh. These actions are presented as media maneuvers, as the two villages had previously been under Israeli control before the war, and are not considered to be deep within Lebanese territory as claimed. These media representations are intended to compensate for the absence of real field achievements.

Recovery of the resistance

In this regard, statements by Hezbollah Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem regarding military recovery appear accurate. A clear improvement in performance is evident compared to the “Operation Al-Bas” battle, where combat was more individual in nature under the concept of fighters’ “field judgment,” and coordination gaps were apparent, particularly when local commanders were killed.

Today, however, operational plans and alternatives are in place, and earlier logistical and positioning problems have been addressed. This development has pushed the enemy to target bridges and roads, especially since, during “Operation Al-Bas,” there were significant difficulties in manpower logistics.

Firepower and technical capabilities

Hezbollah has demonstrated the continued effectiveness of its missile capabilities, with a clear recovery in its rocket units, reflected in long-range salvos reaching up to 200 kilometers (the Gaza envelope).

It has also shown capabilities in air defense, having succeeded in downing several drones and even attempting to target Israeli warplanes and force them to retreat – particularly in the skies over Beirut, marking a first in the history of the resistance.

In addition, Hezbollah maintains capabilities in anti-armor warfare and drone operations. The use of FPV suicide drones with high maneuverability and precision has become prominent, drawing on experience from the Russia–Ukraine war.

Despite the enemy’s technological superiority and aerial dominance, the resistance retains strong reconnaissance capabilities, overcoming obstacles created by enemy fortifications and constant aerial surveillance.

Security level

A source within the resistance’s security apparatus indicates that the recent targeting operations and assassinations resulted from individual security breaches rather than from a structural intelligence penetration, reflecting the cohesion of the Hezbollah’s security system.

The pattern of targets chosen by Israel reveals a state of intelligence blindness. The majority of airstrikes have targeted “security-burned” locations or sites of institutional or civilian character, which suggests a degradation in the effectiveness of the Israeli army’s target bank.

In a related context, the Israeli General Security Service (Shin Bet) issued exceptional instructions, most notably a ban on mobile phones and a complete prohibition on ministers and Knesset members visiting front-line areas in the western and central sectors until further notice. This was accompanied by changes in camouflage protocols, including the use of disguised civilian vehicles when necessary, after it was confirmed that Hezbollah is capable of identifying leadership convoys.

These measures followed an alleged attempt by the resistance to assassinate Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz during a tour in southern Lebanon, according to Israeli media. Opposition leader Yair Lapid launched an attack on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, describing the incident as a “catastrophic intelligence failure.”

Accordingly, this is considered a shock achieved by Hezbollah’s military intelligence unit, alongside its identification of newly established enemy positions and military sites.

Unity of fronts

In this war, the unity of fronts between Iran and its strategic allies is clearly evident, both at the military and political levels.

On the military level, coordination serves as a decisive factor that undermines any enemy attempt at isolation, as clearly demonstrated through field operational coordination.

On the political level, the unity of fronts is reflected in a coordinated stance at the regional and international tables, whereby battlefield gains are translated into diplomatic strength and attempts at isolation or pressure on the resistance are thwarted.

Mousawi: “No current prospect for agreements; the war is long”

Meanwhile, the official in charge of resources and borders in Hezbollah, Sayyed Nawaf al-Mousawi, stated in a private interview that “conditions have not yet matured for any agreements, and we remain in the heart of the battle,” stressing that “the focus now is on fighting in the field, and there is no prospect for agreements at the present time.”

He outlined key Lebanese demands, including an immediate end to all hostile operations, the release of prisoners, an unconditional Israeli withdrawal, the return of displaced civilians, and unrestricted reconstruction, arguing that such terms had already been agreed upon but were not honored. He described the conflict as a unified regional war involving both the US and Israel, claiming that plans existed to intensify pressure on Lebanon, which were strategically anticipated. He also questioned the likelihood of Syrian involvement due to its regional alliances and concluded that the war is a prolonged confrontation where outcomes will be determined on the ground rather than through speculation.

Conclusion

The points outlined in this analysis offer a clear picture of the realities on the ground–military, field, and security alike. Yet competing narratives persist, as the enemy continues to wage a parallel cognitive war, targeting language and the flow of information from the field.

Israel’s repeated targeting of journalists and correspondents in Lebanon and Gaza underscores this effort, most recently the assassinations of Al Manar correspondent Ali Shoeib and Al Mayadeen correspondent Fatima Ftouni, in an apparent attempt to obscure its losses on the ground.

Tamjid Kobaissy
Source: The Cradle

Le coût du transport maritime explose, même pour les routes loin du MO:

"Cost of inbound containers gone up by 7 to 10 times. Yes. That much.

We had a container quote from China that two months ago would be lass than $2000 per container. So $4000 for two. Today we got quoted $7000 per container ($14,000 for two) as well as a few thousand in ” extra charges”. Wow."

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2026/03/war-on-iran-it-is-cheaper-to-pay-for-hormuz-passage-than-to-wage-war.html/comment-page-7#comment-1327956

#Iran #RamadanWar

Secretary-General of the Sayyid al-Shuhada Brigades in Iraq Warns Syria and Kuwait About Escalation

Secretary-General of the Sayyid al-Shuhada Brigades in Iraq, Abu Ala al-Walai, in an important statement:

After the Zionist-American war against Iran entered its second month, and following its failure to achieve its declared objectives, American threats of a ground invasion of the Islamic Republic’s territory have begun to escalate, signaling a transition from limited engagement to all-out war.

In this context, I would like to point out the following:

First: Should American forces use Kuwaiti territory as a launching point for an attack on Iran, the Axis of Resistance, within the framework of the “Unity of Fronts,” will consider this a breach of regional security borders.

Second: Reports are circulating regarding Al-Jolani’s intention to cross borders and move within Lebanese territory in a manner that serves Zionist forces against Lebanon.

Accordingly, if either of these two scenarios materializes, it will inevitably compel the Axis of Resistance to take similar steps, according to the equation of reciprocal response in breaching regional borders.

An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, and the initiator is the one to blame.

Georges Abdallah Declares Support For Iranian Position in War

Georges Abdallah spoke in Beirut today during the launch of a national call for comprehensive resistance. His full statement is published below:

Our region is suffering from a comprehensive imperialist zionist attack. All of our nation’s entities are exposed to destruction. What happened in Syria and what will happen elsewhere lies in wait for us all.

Either we submit to the process of Somalization and accept its priorities or we confront it. Lebanon possesses all the qualities of steadfastness. Its fedayeen possess all the solid will and the necessary concepts for the success of the resistance process.

It is now time for our parties to rise to this level. This attack, which has failed miserably as is clearly evident before us. If we were to choose, we would have chosen no other than this resistance.

Let it be clear to everyone that the fundamental matter is if Iran were to lose today, history will sweep us all away. Either we stand on our feet and look to the future, and look toward Egypt restoring its position, and Turkey restoring its position, and Pakistan restoring its position side by side with Iran, and a comprehensive defeat for all imperialist allies mandates in our world, and consequently, we will create the new world.

source: Resistance News Network

Hezbollah announces Khaybar 2 operation amid heavy rocket fire

The Islamic Resistance in Lebanon announced the launch of Khaybar 2 operations, signifying a new phase of escalation as part of the battle against the zionist occupation.

The operations are being carried out as part of Operation Devoured Straw to defend Lebanon and its people, in retaliation for the zionist aggression that has targeted a vast area of Lebanese villages and cities, including Beirut.

The eight coordinated operations focused on the occupied city of Haifa and its surrounding areas, with Hezbollah fighters striking the Stella Maris base, a strategic naval monitoring and surveillance base along the northern coast, with a salvo of rockets at 8:00 pm local time.

At the same time, the movement announced it targeted the Nasherim base southeast of Haifa with rocket fire and swarms of suicide drones.

Hezbollah also said it struck infrastructure linked to the zionist military in the Krayot area, north of Haifa, using additional rocket barrages.

In a fourth statement on the Khaybar 2 operations, the movement announced it also targeted Tefen Base (east of Akka) at 20:00, using rockets and suicide drones.

Separately, the Islamic Resistance said it fired four rocket salvos at four zionist settlements,  Shlomi, Shomera, Zar’it, and Nahariya.

What the zionist media is saying

In a related development, zionist Channel 12 reported that the Israeli military told settlers it had not detected any Hezbollah movement, indicating an imminent rocket attack, and therefore did not issue warnings.

Earlier,  reports stated that renewed rocket fire from Lebanon emerged, with sirens sounding in Nahariya, Akka, Haifa, and surrounding areas.

At the same time, waves of attack drones reportedly entered occupied Palestine’s airspace following the rocket barrages, triggering sirens across multiple settlements in the Upper al-Jalil.

Channel 12 said rocket fire from Lebanon toward the north had been “continuous,” reporting more than 40 rockets and drones launched toward the region.

Israel Hayom described around 20 minutes of uninterrupted rocket fire directed at Haifa and northern areas.

On its part, Channel 11  quoted former zionist military and intelligence officials as saying the Lebanese front represents a uniquely complex and layered battlefield compared with other arenas.

Hezbollah launched Khaybar 1

On March 17, Hezbollah announced the launch of Khaybar 1 operations. At the time, zionist media reported non-stop sirens across the occupied north of Palestine, as well as continuous rocket launches from South Lebanon.

The Resistance also emphasized that these strikes targeted military objectives only, unlike zionist attacks, which target civilians, stressing that the operations are meant to deter zionist aggression and prevent further escalation against Lebanon.

Incoming!

PS: 5 m à droite et ils mourraient tous. Les base américaines au Moyen Orient n'ont pas d'abris adéquats contre les bombardements.

Qui auraient pu prévoir?™

#Iran #RamadanWar

The People’s Wars Meet the Islamic Upsurge — Condemnation or Cooperation

The project 3rd World Paisa recently released this new text about Maoism, people’s war and Islamic anti-imperialism. Below we link to several different versions of the text. Please distribute and share widely.

3rd World Paisa Linktree

For A4 Printing:
https://cryptpad.fr/file/#/2/file/sz7TvFvMQLhZwJbAYFk+d5aP/

Yemen is in: Southern Occupied Palestine Struck With Ballistic Missiles

Yemen’s Armed Forces have carried out their first military operation since announcing readiness for direct military intervention in the ongoing US-zionist war on the Axis of Resistance, targeting military sites in southern occupied Palestine with a salvo of ballistic missiles.

Yemeni Armed Forces spokesperson Brigadier General Yahya Saree confirmed the operation on Saturday, stating that ballistic missiles struck “sensitive military objectives belonging to the zionist enemy in southern occupied Palestine.”

Saree said the operation coincided with ongoing resistance operations by fighters in Iran and Lebanon, stressing that it “successfully achieved its intended objectives.”

He affirmed that operations would continue “until the declared goals are met and until the aggression ceases across all fronts of the resistance.”

Earlier this morning, zionist media had reported missiles launched from Yemen toward the southern occupied territories, with sirens sounding in Eilat, the Wadi Araba region, and al-Naqab.

Saree’s warning

The strike follows a Friday warning from Saree that the Yemeni Armed Forces were prepared for direct military intervention should certain red lines be crossed.

He named three specific triggers: the formation of additional alliances alongside the US and the entity against Iran or Axis of Resistance states; the use of the Red Sea as a platform for hostile military operations against Iran or any Muslim country; and the continued escalation of the US-Israeli aggression.

Ansar Allah leader Sayyed Abdul Malik al-Houthi had warned Thursday that the US and the zionist regime are advancing a “scheme to reshape the Middle East and establish the so-called Greater Israel,” stressing that Yemen is “not neutral” but stands with the Islamic nation.

Sayyed al-Houthi affirmed that any developments requiring a military response would be met with full readiness, as in previous rounds, while reiterating that Yemen’s military activity targets only US and zionist objectives, not Muslim-majority states or civilian populations.

Yemen declares readiness for direct military intervention unless US, Israel halt aggression

The Yemeni Armed Forces have warned that they are prepared for direct military intervention if American-Israeli aggression against Iran and the Axis of Resistance continues to escalate.

“We confirm that our hands are on the trigger for direct military intervention,” spokesman Brigadier General Yahya Saree said in a statement on Friday.

The statement came nearly a month into the launch of the United States’ and the Israeli regime’s latest bout of unprovoked aggression targeting the Islamic Republic, which has run in tandem with escalation of their attacks on regional resistance groups.

According to Saree, in addition to continuation of the escalation, other factors potentially prompting an intervention by the Yemeni servicemen would include other parties’ participation in the ongoing aggression, and the use of the Red Sea to carry out hostile operations against the Islamic Republic or any other Muslim country. “We will not allow that,” he asserted.

The official said the forces’ position stems from “religious and moral responsibility” amid a broader campaign targeting not only the Islamic Republic, but also the Resistance Axis and the wider Muslim world.

The aggression is aimed at realization of the Israeli regime’s so-called “Greater Israel” scheme, the official said, pointing to Tel Aviv’s ambitions to expand the territories under its occupation to include wider areas across West Asia.

The statement described Yemen’s position as part of the “legitimate right” of regional peoples to confront the Zionist scheme and those trying to carry it out, namely Tel Aviv and Washington.

The servicemen, Saree added, are also motivated by the notion of continued cooperation among the regional countries in the face of such manipulative plots as well as their desire to inflict a “major defeat” upon the aggressors.

Over all, the Yemeni Armed Forces seek to act in line with Sana’a’s principled alignment with the broader global Muslim nation, and, would, accordingly, confront any American-Israeli aggression targeting any single Muslim people.

The spokesman, meanwhile, issued a series of demands from the aggressors.

He called on them to respond to diplomatic efforts aimed at ending the aggression, describing the atrocities as “unjust, oppressive, and unjustified” attacks “that harms global and regional stability and security and harms the global economy.”

The statement further demanded implementation of the ceasefire agreement between the Israeli regime and the Gaza Strip’s Hamas resistance movement. The deal was signed last October in line with a plan devised by the US, which Washington claims is aimed at ending Tel Aviv’s war of genocide on Gaza.

The statement also cautioned against any move to increase pressure on Yemen itself by tightening the blockade on the Arab Peninsula nation.