So unpacking a little further: The concept of land-property is an abstraction of a type of micro- warfare and empire put into terms that make it feel ok.
It's disturbing to me to dig this deep, because I'm a former libertarian who likes the idea of property, a type of order within freedom, where I am theoretically able to earn a square of land that is mine, where I are nearly completely free to do with it and on it whatever I like.
But zoom out. Consider the rent economy. Not scary when it's just an elderly couple with an extra house or a duplex with which they make supplemental money.
That becomes an empire when it becomes a sky rise. Or a corporation buying up every cheap property in a town and jacking up prices for shelter.
It is land upon which they can do whatever they want and set whatever rules. Lots and lots of land. In some cases, all the land as far as the eye can see.
They are Kings of vast segments of area that they didn't (themselves) raise a sword to gain. But don't let that fool you into thinking it wasn't conquest. They spent their units of power (money), that when traced back far enough, the methods of its "earning" were, in fact, quite violent in nature. In order to gain enough units of power to buy a kingdom, violence was surely done. Freedoms were surely taken.
And once they have purchased enough land, they are effectively lords, and no one has any freedom but they.
Viewed through this lens, property is antithetical to core libertarian values. Property is a form of tyranny and empire. An instrument of theft and inherently a fraud.
I hate it. But that's what's under the curtain.
🧵
#deconstruction #decolonization #AbuseCulture #QuestionEverything