#PublierLaScience #OA "Diamond Open Access Needs Institutions, Not Heroes" : intéressant billet sur le blog #ScholarlyKitchen.
"Diamond open access is often described as “community-led,” and implicitly sustained by goodwill. While that may be viable on a small scale, it is not viable at the scale suggested by current policy ambitions.
This raises a specific and more practical question: what would it mean to support community-led publishing as infrastructure, rather than as a collection of heroic individual efforts?"
"Diamond OA as infrastructure, not a publishing model".
"From Ideals to Systems".
Remumérer le peerreviewing?
A lire
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/02/18/guest-post-diamond-open-access-needs-institutions-not-heroes/
Guest Post — Diamond Open Access Needs Institutions, Not Heroes - The Scholarly Kitchen

Today's guest blogger asks: What would it mean to support community-led publishing as infrastructure, rather than as a collection of heroic individual efforts?

The Scholarly Kitchen

RE: https://phalanstere.social/@the_conversation_fr/116138239999899644

#PublierLaScience 2500$ pour devenir 2e auteur d'une fausse publi dans une revue indexée par Embase (base de données de référence en médecine, comme Pubmed). On peut choisir son article et sa position d'auteur. cf. cet "appel à auteur" (frauduleux) diffusé sur Facebook.
Merci pour cette copie d'écran @the_conversation_fr qui illustre les pratiques des #papermills : cela donne du concret à nos discours de sensibilisation.