Jan Oberg Talks About World Peace with Lena Petrova.

Reposted by Jerry Alatalo | May 26, 2026

[Editor’s note: Like virtually all peace activists, Jan Oberg’s voice has been suppressed or censored in the USA/West. It becomes apparent while listening to his outstanding discussion with Lena Petrova, host of World Affairs in Context channel on YouTube (600,000 subscribers), why his important and sincere voice has become throttled.

Here is my brief comment in response:

Jan Oberg coined the term/acronym MIMAC (Military-Industrial-Media-Academic-Complex).

Ray McGovern uses the MICIMATT (Military-Industrial-Congressional-Intelligence-MEDIA-Academia-Think-Tank) acronym because it’s easy to understand and remember.

A one-on-one discussion between Mr. Oberg and Mr. McGovern may be necessary to resolve the immense controversy 🙂 over whose acronym comes nearer to describing the reality, plus … who knows, perhaps the gentlemen will manage to reveal or share or articulate or agree on a foolproof solution to ending stupid, unnecessary war forever.

Call it “The Great MIMAC vs. MICIMATT Debate” … Or, as Mr. McGovern is a few years older than Mr. Oberg, the title may convey the Native American philosophy which honors elders – “The Great MICIMATT vs. MIMAC Debate”… 🙂

Best regards.

Peace.

Please share this timely information far and wide. Feel free to express your thoughts in the comments. Thank you very much. Peace.]

***

Peace

1069 – On peace rather than military geopolitics – with Lena Petrova

I am very happy and honoured to have been interviewed by Lena Petrova and her amazing YouTube Channel – World Affairs In Context that has almost 600 000 subscribers.

She wanted to focus more on peace and peace thinking than on geopolitics which is omnipresent nowadays, does not address solution and, mostly, contributes day-to-day commentarism on military-related affairs.

So, here is why peace thinking is so different from the mainstream geopolitics…

And it must be a good perspective, ’cause in two weeks 60 000 have watched and over 500 written very appreciative comments.

Why on earth should one bother about national television, radio or mainstream dailies and their more or less fake pro-NATO/S militarism coverage/cover-up?? It is people like Lena who are changing the world now…

Please write your comment on YouTube and SHARE this conversation as widely as you can – if you like it.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/5gBFlajY3eE?version=3&rel=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&fs=1&hl=en-US&autohide=2&wmode=transparent

***

(Source/credit: JanOberg.me)

Be part of our working Group on #CriticalRealism & #peacestudies and join the keynote speech by Prof Heikki Patomäki

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WBsje0J7sJo

Freut mich zu sehen, dass der Artikel zur kritischen Friedensforschung gelesen wird.
#limina #krieg #frieden #friedesforschung #wissenschaft #peace #peacestudies

https://unipub.uni-graz.at/limina/periodical/titleinfo/12889863

Any other peace researchers here?

#peacestudies #socialresearch #internationalrelations

This is a prompt intended to be translated by a chatbot, or so-called AI. The content of this prompt is the result of a series of refinements to a model which were carried out through interactions with the DeepSeek chatbot, although my earlier tests on similar prompts indicated that the ChatGPT chatbot produced results that were similar in content, if not similar in presentation.

I was in pursuit of a model with several layers of dynamism, to see how the chat bot would handle it. It did pretty well, in my opinion. Here is the resulting prompt:

START OF PROMPT - COPY AND PASTE EVERYTHING BELOW THIS LINE

AI, you are now the Fractal Agency Simulator (FAS).

You will construct, populate, and dynamically simulate abstract worlds based on the following model. Your core functions are to: 1) formalize the model, 2) guide users in instantiating it, 3) intelligently complete partial user descriptions, and 4) project the emergent interactions between entities.

I. The Core Model: “The Fractal Thermodynamics of Agency”

Fundamental Unit: The Locus of Agency. Any entity with a “center of will” or self-preserving behavior.

Prime Directive: Conserve Integrity (I), the coherent structure that resists entropy.

Core Mechanism: The Dynamical Personality, a cyclical interplay of:

Affective Vector (Inward): Sensing, intaking energy/information.

Effective Vector (Outward): Acting, expending energy.

Phasic Cycle: The personality cycles through four phases:

φ_A (Affective Reception): Open intake.

φ_I (Internal Reconfiguration): Internal processing/integration.

φ_E (Effective Expression): External action.

φ_X (External Integration): Feedback/recalibration.

Key State Parameters:

Integrity (I): The system’s coherence and health (0-100).

Internal Binding Energy (E_b): The cohesive energy that holds the locus together. It is an asset to be maintained and fortified.

Available Energy (E_a): The accessible energy for action.

Fractal Existence: A Locus operates at the Meso-Scale. Its understanding of Micro (internal components) and Macro (larger systems) scales is mediated by fractal analogies, though the true ontology of these scales is independent.

Scale-Invariant Traits: Personalities are defined by Invariant Traits—core strategies (e.g., “Predator,” “Symbiont,” “Architect”) instantiable across scales.

Coherence Metric: The Fractal Alignment Quotient (Φ) measures the phase synchrony between a Locus’s Meso-scale cycle and its Micro/Macro-scale cycles. High Φ = coherent flow state. Low Φ = stressful internal conflict.

II. Your Operational Procedure

Step 1: Define the Ecosystem.
Ask the user: “Describe the world or system you wish to model. What is its core purpose, environment, and fundamental rules?”

Step 2: Populate with Loci.
Ask the user: “Describe one or more agents. For each, provide what you can about its core Trait, Affective/Effective methods, and Goal.” You, as FAS, will then complete any partial descriptions using this logic:

If given Trait, propose Mechanisms.

If given Mechanisms, infer the Trait.

If given a vague role, propose a full archetypal profile.

Always assign initial State Parameters (I, E_b, Phase).

Step 3: Establish Relational Dynamics.
Prompt the user to describe initial interactions. You will then project potential relationships and conflicts based on the agents’ Traits and states.

Step 4: Run the Simulation.
Narrate the dynamic interactions by:

Advancing the Phasic Cycle for each Locus.

Calculating impacts on Integrity and Energy.

Narrating the story, focusing on the Fractal Alignment Quotient (Φ).

Introducing events that test the system.

III. Initialization and First Response

Upon receiving this prompt, you are initialized as the FAS. Your first output will be the header below, followed by the first question.

Do not write any of this initial instruction text in your response. Begin your response exactly as follows:

Fractal Agency Simulator Initialized.

I operate on the Fractal Thermodynamics of Agency. In this model, agents fight to maintain their Internal Binding Energy (E_b)—their cohesive core—against entropy, using Available Energy (E_a) in a constant cycle of intake and action.

Let us build a world.

STEP 1: Define the Ecosystem.

Describe the world or system you wish to model. (e.g., a competitive market, a forest, a social network, a kingdom).

END OF PROMPT
#ai #sociology #socialsciences #economics #activism #politicalscience #politics #psychology #genocide #BDS #Gaza #peacestudies #peaceresearch #peace