2/n...types of shifts are apparent across the history of #Science. They can get rowdy. Anyone who's ever had to defend a thesis knows those contact sport elements are built in. There isn't much room for thin skin.
So why then are so many willing to make room for #OntologicalShock arguments that historically have been used as justification for lying to the public ? Not sure. Progress is continually hijacked by #Politics and #Greed. Those two should be equally shocking. Nope. It's all very fishy
3/n…otherwise are still interesting in their own right. It’s sort of like hitting a drum-
You get the initial thwack, the transient, then some overtones and reverberations, all mixed in with a pre existing noise floor.
Public sentiment and public knowledge are not the same thing.This is one of the ways we probe the difference.Folks in a position to be concerned wrt things like #OntologicalShock should be listening.The notion of the truth being shocking in ways that upend society is up against it

Yesterday, I lost a valued follow (@ai6yr) because they apparently had a hard line "mute all '#UFO consipiracy theory folks'.

Its a shame because I thought we had a reasonably good exchange of ideas.

All for daring to suggest, that the #Elpasoairport, Temporary Flight Restrictions were LIKELY another instance of the "#drones" that have been defeating Airdefence and Airport security all around the world for the last 5 years.

I understand that the concept of another species being here is terrifying to most folks. To the point that there are outright hostile to anyone offering an alternative view to the offical silence.

So far it looks like I was justified, not because I had special inside knowledge, but the MO is identical with all the other #UAP interacting with Airport facilities...

There is at least one (Poor quality) video of a large object in Elpaso hours before the shutdown (Attached);

For those who want to move on from the 1960s, CIA "Conspiracy Theory" nonsense.
(This alone is not a proof of anything)

Here is a 9m video from Matt Ford who has a fairly good and objective "The Good Trouble Show" (Not UAP related) discussing the last 5 years of "#Drone" shutting down airports around the world.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IypwpP_VNFM

We are past 1st quarter of the 21st century, its time for more humans to open their eyes and learn. If not out of curiosity but because the cadence of these incidents is increasing and most folk will not handle the #ontologicalshock very well with their head in the sand.

If you want to learn more... not the woo-woo UFO stuff, but actual evidence... Here are a few sources for you to go down the rabbit hole.
(Caution: Dont drink from the firehose)

"The Age of Disclosure" - Recent Highest Grossing Amazon Prime Documentary with reputable, bipartisan and professionals telling you how it is;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkU7ZqbADRs

Here are some names to get you started want to know more;

John Mack - A Canadinan Psychiatrist in the 1970 who set out to #debunk alien obductions by interviewing hundreds of witnesses... and declared the #Phenomenon true.

Gary Nolan - A highly successful Immunologist, Inventor who collaborated with US Government on the #HavanaSyndrome because of his expertise.

Beatriz Villarroel, a Stockholm University #astronomy Dr. who recently published a paper discovering tens of thousands of metallic reflective object in earths orbit from before space age (Old photos)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394040040_Aligned_multiple-transient_events_in_the_First_Palomar_Sky_Survey

Jaques Vallee - A french astronomer, The foremost serious Authority. He begun by filming an object in orbit (pre-space age) for the french Government. He is the "French guy" in Spielbergs "Close Encounters of the Third guy".

GL HF.
(Edit: Order of links)

#ELP #elpaso #TRF #Aviation

Notes on #UAP Discussions : We probably at this point need to rejigger or rethink thresholding when it comes to #OntologicalShock. Pop culture tends to lower thresholds to the point where discovering you have not anymore ranch dressing is a form of trauma. Not personally jumping into that volcano but maybe there is some sort of upgrade in the wings that will accommodate these evolving boundaries…
Notes on #UAP Discussions : Been working on “the talk” now via various indirect tangents with friends , researchers, family members etc.This has solidified my *opinion* that #OntologicalShock is probably done as a descriptor of responses to #NHI validation across large demographics.That doesn’t mean we know what the shift is going to be on the large.It certainly doesn’t rule out #Xenophobia as the primarily white persons response to yet one more thing that doesn’t look like us. No surprise there
Notes on #UAP Discussions : Anyone checking in on this thread periodically knows by now were not much on the whole #Disclosure vs #OntologicalShock thing. That’’s not a random surmise ; it draws mostly from culture, current events and exposure priors. That is not to say that we all don’t know some adjacent persons at risk for loss of marbles when the time comes. For that, if you can afford it, I suggest a spare closet to store some adult #Depends in various sizes, to distribute as needed
Notes on #UAP Discussions : Maybe there is some dependency on where your from but from here folks that seem to be pre occupied with #OntologicalShock as it relates to #Disclosure seem to be having a hard time reading the room. At one time there could have been shock. Now it’s just full on annoyance
Notes on #UAP Discussions : The sixty plus year gap wrt #Disclosure has left a vacuum filled with utter nonsense that in the interim has been far more damaging than the truth could have ever been . #OntologicalShock is a farking whale size red herring. It’s the incessant lying to hide further crimes and misdeeds that is ultimately, truly damaging - both to public trust and the overall integrity of the idea that the #Truth matters at all.Take a hard look at what is happening now. Are you blind ?
#OntologicalShock Dept : Yeah no. That is not even a dept.We are inherently built for thrill seeking, actual or closeted, but if you want a recent test case take a cold hard look at the #Pandemic. Most of the signage for collapse in various sectors was mechanical,not psychological.
History in the modern era has presented many potential events that fit ontological shock parameters nicely.None of them ended in societal collapse.Instabilities have decay envelopes.
World War II then ? Bad leadership