I rarely toot, but I had to take my keyboard here to react on an opinion in the Nature Biotechnology issue.
The community of the DAO. Nat Biotechnol 41, 1357 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-02005-1
Weren't all of us, except the worst grifter, agreeing that crypto-money was just a grift, solving basically no problem? DAOs are just an extension of crypto-money, trying to make the grift live a bit longer. I will not go over all the problem that goes into blockchains and deregulated markets, some people have done that way better than me, but DAOs are just a way to get new people to buy into it.
Worst here, it is trying to get people with good intentions, a curious mind, and a wish to help human progress to buy into something that is anything but that. It is honestly disgusting.
Even if it is in the opinion section of a sub-journal, I am pretty appalled seeing that kind of thing in a Nature journal. I really hope there will be some reaction against it. We don't need that crap invading the research space. Finding money is one of the worst parts of research, and I am all for trying to find new ways of raising funds. But a DAO ain't it. If you want to crowdfund your project (basically what is proposed here), there exist ways that are way better than a Ponzi scheme that ruins the environment. Don't buy into that crap.
#science #sciencefunding #nature #naturebiotechnology #opinion