#OpenRxiv just added an #AI #PeerReview feature for #preprints on #bioRxiv and #medRxiv. At the moment, they're using the #qedscience tool.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-03909-5

The bioRxiv announcement makes clear that AI review is optional for authors and that authors might be able to choose from other AI tools in the future.
https://connect.biorxiv.org/news/2025/11/04/qed_review_tool

PS: My experiments lead me to think that AI isn't good enough to do peer review yet -- even if (1) it's getting better, (2) it can already help human reviewers, and (3) many human reviewers are worse. Journals that allow it too large a role are abdicating their responsibility and might be deceiving authors and readers. Referees who give it too large a role are abdicating their responsibility and might be deceiving journals, authors, and readers. If you lean in the same direction, let me suggest that these objections don't carry over to preprint servers making AI review an #FWIW option for authors. This kind of AI review doesn't pretend to be more than it is. When it happens, it's a voluntary decision by authors. Of course authors could have gotten AI feedback on their own, with the AI tools of their choice, and without the preprint-server mediation. But giving them another option for the same kind of feedback is harmless and convenient. Moreover, it creates a training ground to monitor the quality and improvement of the AI tools.

AI reviewers are here — we are not ready

Artificial intelligence promises rapid and polite feedback on papers — but we must first review the reviewer.

Neue Studie zeigt: IgG-Antikörper von ME/CFS-Patientinnen und Patienten dringen gezielt in Endothelzellen ein, verbleiben länger als bei Gesunden und verursachen Zellschäden. Das stützt die Idee, dass Autoantikörper direkte Krankheitsfaktoren sind und Gefäßfunktionen sowie Mikrozirkulation beeinträchtigen – ein möglicher Schlüssel für neue Diagnostik und Therapie.

Übersetzung und Zusammenfassung auf: https://www.fatigatio.de/aktuelles/detail/zusammenfassung-studie-vergleichende-analyse-des-eindringens-von-igg-aus-me-cfs-patienten-in-menschliche-endothelzellen

#MECFS #medrxiv #Preprint #Endothelzellen #MECFSFachtagung

1/2

Boys with Noonan Syndrome at the 97%ile for BMI will collapse into a singularity at ~17.5 years age. It's very sad. In other news, learned in 2 days how to use #Rlang #quarto-preprint with #typst to submit a report on corrected LMS growth curve parameters to #MedRxiv doi:10.1101/2025.07.29.25332354
Personal night light exposure predicts incidence of cardiovascular diseases in >88,000 individuals

Key Points Question: Does personal light exposure predict incidence of cardiovascular diseases? Findings: In this study of ~89,000 adults aged >40 years, exposure to brighter light at night predicted higher incidence of coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and stroke, independent of established cardiovascular risk factors. Meaning: Avoiding exposure to night light may lower risk for cardiovascular diseases. Abstract Importance: Light at night causes circadian disruption, which is a known risk factor for adverse cardiovascular outcomes. However, it is not well understood whether personal light exposure patterns predicts and individual's risk of cardiovascular diseases. Objective: To assess whether day and night light exposure predicts incidence of cardiovascular diseases, and whether relationships of light with cardiovascular diseases differ according to genetic susceptibility, sex, and age. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: United Kingdom. Participants: N=88,905, age (M±SD) = 62.4±7.8 years, 56.9% female. Exposure: Approximately 13 million hours of personal light exposure data, tracked by wrist-worn light sensors (one week each). Main Outcomes and Measures: Incidence of coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and stroke, derived from UK National Health Service records, across a 9.5-year follow-up after light tracking. Results: People with the brightest nights (90-100th percentiles) had significantly higher risks of developing coronary artery disease (adjusted-HR range: 1.23-1.32), myocardial infarction (aHRs: 1.42-1.47), heart failure (aHRs: 1.45-1.56), atrial fibrillation (aHRs: 1.28-1.32), and stroke (aHRs: 1.28-1.30), compared to people with dark nights (0-50th percentiles). These relationships were robust after adjusting for established risk factors for cardiovascular health, including physical activity, smoking, alcohol, diet, sleep duration, socioeconomic status, and polygenic risk. Relationships of night light with risk of heart failure and coronary artery disease were stronger for women, and relationships of night light with risk of heart failure and atrial fibrillation were stronger for younger individuals in this cohort. Conclusions and Relevance: Night light exposure was a significant risk factor for developing cardiovascular diseases in this cohort. In addition to current preventative measures, avoiding light at night may be a useful strategy for reducing risks of cardiovascular diseases. ### Competing Interest Statement Conflicts of Interest Disclosures: M.K.R. has consulted for Eli Lilly and has modest stock ownership in GSK. M.K.R. disclosures are not related to the current work. F.A.J.L.S. served on the Board of Directors for the Sleep Research Society and has received consulting fees from the University of Alabama at Birmingham and Morehouse School of Medicine. F.A.J.L.S. interests were reviewed and managed by Brigham and Women's Hospital and Partners HealthCare under their conflict-of-interest policies. F.A.J.L.S. consultancies are not related to the current work. S.W.C. has consulted for Dyson. A.J.K.P. and S.W.C. are co-founders and co-directors of Circadian Health Innovations PTY LTD. A.J.K.P. and S.W.C. have received research funding from Versalux and Delos. S.W.C. has received research funding from Beacon Lighting. D.P.W, A.C.B., J.M.L., and R.S. have no conflicts of interest to disclose. ### Funding Statement Funding/Support: D.P.W. was supported by the Australian Research Council (DP210102924 and DP220102812). J.M.L. was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R35-GM146839 and R01-HG012810. F.A.J.L.S. partly supported by NIH grants R01-HL140574, R01-HL153969, R01-HL164454, and R01-HL167746. Role of the Funder/Sponsor: Funding sources did not play a role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or the final decision to submit the manuscript for publication. ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: This research was conducted using UK Biobank data (Project ID: 6818), and ethical approval was granted by the North West Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee. The Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee of Monash University also gave ethical approval for this work. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes All data used in the present work are available upon application to the UK Biobank team. <https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/showcase/>

medRxiv

Semantic search engine for ArXiv, biorxiv and medrxiv

https://arxivxplorer.com/

#HackerNews #SemanticSearch #ArXiv #Biorxiv #Medrxiv #ResearchTools

arXiv Xplorer

Semantic search for arXiv.

In the updated license selector, the most open Creative Commons licenses appear first, with refreshed accessible language for each license that centers the researcher and their choices. Thanks to the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative for supporting these efforts.

#OpenScience #Preprints #CreativeCommons #bioRxiv #medRxiv #OpenAccess #Research #openRxiv

Scholar Inbox

This tool offers semantic search & indexes arxiv, bioRxiv, medRxiv & ChemRxiv. It also allows you to see all the figures in a paper, without opening the entire paper itself. To get into paper figure preview mode, click on the little icon like a downward pointing triangle at the lower right side of abstract, & click on the little icon with a magnifying glass. The images will be bigger than in the article.

https://www.scholar-inbox.com

#research #arxiv #bioRxiv #medRxiv
#ChemRxiv

Scholar Inbox

Scholar Inbox is a personal paper recommender which enables researchers to stay up-to-date with the most relevant progress in their field based on their personal research interests. Scholar Inbox is free of charge and daily indexes all of arXiv, bioRxiv, medRxiv and ChemRxiv as well as several open access proceedings in computer science. Register today and never miss a beat again!

internationalen Cochrane‑Reviews, Publikationen in renommierten Fachzeitschriften wie #Nature und The #Lancet sowie aus Datenbanken wie #medRxiv und #PubMed – belegen, dass die #Qualität der #Innenraumluft einen zentralen Einfluss auf die Übertragungswege von Aerosol‑ und Tröpfchenviren besitzt.

Prépublications en sciences de la vie et de la santé : #bioRxiv et #medRxiv lancent #openRxiv une organisation indépendante à but non lucratif chargée de leur gouvernance
#Preprints #OpenAccess

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00762-4

Preprint sites bioRxiv and medRxiv launch new era of independence

The popular repositories, on which life scientists post research before peer review, will be managed by a new organization called openRxiv.

#Preprint sites #bioRxiv and #medRxiv launch new era of independence
The popular repositories, where life #scientists post research before #peerreview, will be managed by a new organization called #openRxiv.
Until now, they had been managed by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. The new organization, named openRxiv, will have a board of directors and a scientific and medical advisory board. It is supported by a fresh US$16M grant from Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI).
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00762-4
Preprint sites bioRxiv and medRxiv launch new era of independence

The popular repositories, on which life scientists post research before peer review, will be managed by a new organization called openRxiv.